Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Risk Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods of Engineers in Training: Application of a Comprehensive Risk Model

  • Original Research/Scholarship
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This survey was conducted in 2017 to investigate factors influencing social risk perception of biotechnologists and plant breeders in training toward GM food based on a conceptual model. A random sample of 210 biotechnologists and plant breeders in training was studied. Confirmatory factor analysis and the reliability tests (Cronbach’s alpha) have been used to verify the uni-dimensionality of the measurement scale, SEM also was carried out to determine the most parsimonious models with the best fit for social risk perception of GM foods and path analysis was conducted to understand the exogenous variables introduced in the research model. The findings revealed that the engineers in training had moderate social risk perception regarding GM foods. Moreover, the results of structural equation modeling showed the capability of the model in predicting the social risk perceptions of engineers in training. The psychological attributes of risks, social benefit perception, attitude toward using technology, level of religiosity, and moral and ethical beliefs emerged as the most powerful predictors of the social risk perception. The social benefit perception and attitude toward using technology also mediated the effects of psychological attributes of risks, level of religiosity, and moral and ethical beliefs. The social benefit perception also had an indirect influence on the engineers in training’s social risk perception of GM foods. Finally, we recommend the application of the model developed by this study for better understanding of social risk perception of stakeholders to have a more informed view of the development and promotion of GM foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerni, P. (2005). Stakeholder attitudes towards the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods in South Africa. Environmental Science & Policy,8(5), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. R. (1997). Psychological testing and assessment (9th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, L., Azad, M. A. K., Gausmian, M. H., & Zulkifli, F. (2014). Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon. PLoS ONE,9(1), e86174. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo, A. M., & Gil, J. M. (2007). Spanish consumers’ attitudes and acceptability towards GM food products. Agricultural Economics Review,8(1), 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Shah Alam: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA Publication Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, H., Ghanian, M., Ghuchani, O. M., Rafiaani, P., Taning, C. N. T., Hajivand, R. Y., et al. (2015). Genetically modified foods: Towards agricultural growth, agricultural development, or agricultural sustainability? Food Reviews International,31(3), 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, H., Talsma, N., Ho, P., & Zarafshani, K. (2011). GM foods in Ethiopia: A realistic way to increase agricultural performance? Trends in Biotechnology,29(1), 6–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzekiene, A., Telesiene, A., & Butkeviciene, E. (2014). Food risk perceptions and purchasing behaviour in Lithuania: Towards a culture of fear? Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,5(1), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, And Performance Journal,19(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations,61(8), 1139–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, Ch. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society,20(2), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food–results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy,24(1), 23–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V. J. (2014). Risk perception: It’s personal. Environmental Health Perspectives,122(10), A276–A279. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, P. B. (2008). Social risks in aquaculture. In M. G. Bondad-Reantaso, J. R. Arthur, & R. P. Subasinghe (Eds.), Understanding and applying risk analysis in aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture technical paper (no. 519, pp. 209–228). Rome: FAO.

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. F. (2008). An integrated research framework to understand consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward genetically modified foods. British Food Journal,110(6), 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. F., & Li, H. L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference,18(4), 662–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chern, W. S., Rickertsen, K., Tsuboi, N., & Fu, T. (2002). Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and salmon: A multiple-country assessment. AgBioForum,5(3), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Factors influencing people’s acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust. Science Communication,32(4), 514–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsements of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues,56(3), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fader, M., Gerten, D., Krause, M., Lucht, W., & Gramer, W. (2013). Spatial decoupling of agricultural production and consumption: Quantifying dependences of countries on food imports due to domestic land and water constraints. Environmental Research Letters,8(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (2000). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Perception of risk (pp. 80–103). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J., Van der Lans, I., Fischer, A. R. H., Reinders, M. J., Menozzi, D., Zhang, X., et al. (2013). Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology,30(2), 142–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, S., Husmann, D., Wingenbach, G., Rutherford, T., Egger, V., & Wadhwa, P. (2004). Awareness and acceptance of biotechnology issues among youth, undergraduates, and adults. AgBioForum,6(4), 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, G., Allum, N., & Stares, S. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002, Eurobarometer 58.0. A report to the Directorate General for Research from the project “Life Sciences in European Society”. European Commission, Brussels.

  • Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S. H., Zarafshani, K., Van Passel, S., et al. (2015). Attitudes of agricultural experts toward genetically modified crops: A case study in southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics,21(4), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, S., Karami, E., & Azadi, H. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics,19(3), 1201–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, P., & Gurtoo, S. (2011). Factors influencing public perception of genetically modified organisms. GMO Biosafety Research,2(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G., Bredahl, L., & Scholderer, J. (2003). Four questions on European consumers’ attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food production. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies,4(4), 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guehlstorf, C. (2008). Understanding the scope of farmer perceptions of risk: Considering farmer opinions on the use of genetically modified (GM) foods as a stakeholder voice. Policy Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,21(6), 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy, D., & Rutherford, D. G. (2004). Host attitudes toward tourism: An improved structural model. Annals of Tourism Research,31(3), 495–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (pp. 1–816). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C. J. R., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. (2010). Genetically modified foods and foods: Perceptions of risks. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Edinburgh.

  • Hall, C., & Moran, D. (2006). Investigating GM risk perceptions: A survey of anti-GM and environmental campaign group members. Journal of Rural Studies,22(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., & Sandoe, P. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite,41(2), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C. (2005). Cultures of GM: Discourses of risk and labeling of GMOs in the UK and the EU. Area,37(3), 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, F., Onyango, B., Schilling, B., Hallman, W., & Adelaja, A. (2003). Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. Consumer Studies,27(5), 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, W. D., & Macinnis, D. J. (2009). Consumer behavior (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. (2015). Theorizing the risk city. In Risk city (Chapter 2, pp. 21–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9768-9_2.

  • Jackson, J., Allum, N., & Gaskell, G. (2006). Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research: The case of the fear of crime. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), Art. 20. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114fqs0601202.

  • Jacobsen, S. E., Sørensen, M., Pedersen, S. M., & Weiner, J. (2013). Feeding the world: Genetically modified foods versus agricultural biodiversity. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,33(4), 651–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E. (2012). A perspective on the social amplification of risk. The Bridge,42(3), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, R. B. (2012). Consumer attitude of risk and benefits toward genetically modified (GM) foods in South Korea: Implications for food policy. Engineering Economics,23(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latifah, A., Jamaluddin, M. J., Rahim, M. N. A., Mohamad, O., & Nor, M. M. (2006). Factors affecting public attitude toward genetically modified food in Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana,35(1), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghari, B. M., & Ardekani, A. M. (2011). Genetically modified foods and social concerns. Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology,3(3), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M. K., & Hursti, U. K. (2002). Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food. Appetite,39(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metoyer-Duran, C. (1993). Information gatekeepers. In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science & technology (Vol. 28, pp. 111–150). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2003). Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards. Journal of Risk Research,6(3), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, R., & Rayner, S. (2010). Integrating psychometric and cultural theory approaches to formulate an alternative measure of risk perception. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research,23(2), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordgard, L., Bohn, T., Gillund, F., Gronsberg, I. M., Iversen, M., Myhr, A. I., et al. (2015). Uncertainty and knowledge gaps related to environmental risk assessment of GMOs. Genok biosafety report 2015/03. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1947.7847.

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2003). The use of genetically modified crops in developing countries. A follow-up discussion paper (Chapter 4, pp. 45–61). http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/GM-Crops-Discussion-Paper-2003.pdf.

  • Poncet, S. (2008). Biotechnology approaches to developing herbicide tolerance/selectivity in foods. http://team.univparis1.fr/teamperso/sponcet/SciencesPo/Slides_DevtEco1.pdf.

  • Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2003). Public perceptions of risk, science and governance. Main findings of a British survey on five risk cases (technical report). Norwich: Centre for Environmental Risk. http://www.psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/survey2002.pdf.

  • Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., & Zani, B. (2012). The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: Test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Quality and Preference,25(2), 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (2008). The fourth estate and the fifth branch: The news media, GM risk, and democracy in Australia. New Genetics and Society,27(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, R., Ross, D. G., & Berube, D. M. (2011). Rhetoric and risk. Poroi Journal,7(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2000). Stolen Harvest: The hijacking of the global food supply. Cambridge: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M. (2001). Poorer European countries are less concerned about biotechnology than richer countries. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment,12(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M. (2003). Perception of gene technology and food risks: Results of a survey in Switzerland. Risk Research,6(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M., Keller, C., & Kiers, H. A. (2005). A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis,25(1), 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M., Keller, C., & Kiers, H. (2006). Lay people’s perception of food hazards: Comparing aggregated data and individual data. Appetite,47(3), 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis,20(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (2000). Perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. M., Peterson, J. M., Leatherman, J. C., & Williams, J. R. (2012). Simulation of factors impeding water quality trading. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy,42(2), 162–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spetsidis, N. M., & Schamel, G. (2002). A consumer based approach towards new product development through biotechnology in the agro-food sector. In V. Santaniello, R. E. Evenson, & D. Zilberman (Eds.), Market development for genetically modified foods (pp. 63–79). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toms, B. (2013). Ethical concerns in plant biotechnological research. International Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering Research,4(3), 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., et al. (2005). Categories of GM risk-benefit perceptions and their antecedents. AgBioForum,7(4), 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicsek, L. (2013). Gene-fouled or gene-improved? Media framing of GM crops and food in Hungary. New Genetics and Society,32(1), 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilella-Vila, M., & Costa-Font, J. (2008). Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. The Journal of Socio-Economics,37(5), 2095–2106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (2009). Exploring the influences on Australian agricultural professionals’ genetic engineering beliefs: An empirical analysis. Technology Transfer,34(4), 422–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickson, F. (2007). From risk to uncertainty in the regulation of GMOs: Social theory and Australian practice. New Genetics and Society,26(3), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirz, C. D., Xenos, M. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Chung, J. H., & Massarani, L. (2018). Rethinking social amplification of risk: Social media and zika in three languages. Risk Analysis,38(12), 2599–2624. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. (2013). A comparative study of American and Chinese college students’ social trust, conspiracy beliefs, and attitudes toward genetically modified crop. Graduate theses and dissertations. Paper 13282 (pp. 1–78). Iowa State University.

  • Zandvoort, H. (2005). Good engineers need good laws. European Journal of Engineering Education,30(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

    Sedigheh Ghasemi, Mostafa Ahmadvand & Ayatollah Karami

  2. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Ezatollah Karami

Authors
  1. Sedigheh Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mostafa Ahmadvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ezatollah Karami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ayatollah Karami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Ahmadvand.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, S., Ahmadvand, M., Karami, E. et al. Social Risk Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods of Engineers in Training: Application of a Comprehensive Risk Model. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 641–665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00110-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00110-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation