Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novice Researchers’ Views About Online Ethics Education and the Instructional Design Components that May Foster Ethical Practice

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH/SCHOLARSHIP
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine novice researchers’ views about online ethics education and to identify the instructional design components that may foster ethical practice. Applying the mixed methods approach, data were collected via a survey and semi-structured interviews among M.Sc. and Ph.D. students in science and engineering. The findings point to the need for rethinking the way conventional online ethics courses are developed and delivered; encouraging students to build confidence in learning from distance, engaging them in online active and interactive experiences, and providing them with personalized support and adaptive guidance. The novice researchers identified the synergistic integration of collaborative, case-based, and contextual learning, as the instructional design components that may foster not only ethical knowledge but also ethical practice in a fully online course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. A. (2016). Pedagogical support for responsible conduct of research training. Hastings Center Report,46(1), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior,19(5), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antes, A. L., Kuykendall, A., & DuBois, J. M. (2019). The lab management practices of “research exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators. PLoS ONE,14(4), e0214595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics,19(3), 1305–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education,47, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Levenberg, A. (2016). A model of flexible thinking in contemporary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity,22, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Usher, M. (2019). The innovation profile of nanotechnology team projects of face-to-face and online learners. Computers & Education,137, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Hussein-Farraj, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2016). On-campus or online: Examining self-regulation and cognitive transfer skills in different learning settings. The International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,13(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweiger, P., & Goodman, K. W. (2007). The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects' protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine,82(9), 861–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggle, A., & Mitcham, C. (2012). Ethics and science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin,70, 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, C. (2016). Scientific misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology,67, 693–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein-Farraj, R., Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Lifelong learning at the technion: Graduate students' perceptions of and experiences in distance learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects,8(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill, Irwin.‏

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (Ed.). (2013). The oxford handbook of quantitative methods: Foundations, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2010). NOT-OD-10–019. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). (2009). Responsible conduct of research. NSF’s implementation of Section 7009 of the America COMPETES Act. Federal Register,74(160), 42126–42128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T., Nestor, F., Beach, G., & Heitman, E. (2018). America COMPETES at 5 years: An analysis of research-intensive universities’ RCR training plans. Science and Engineering Ethics,24(1), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkus, R. L., Gloeckner, C., & Fortunato, A. (2015). The role of professional knowledge in case-based reasoning in practical ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,21(3), 767–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2015). Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavale, R., Ferreira, G. I., Galvão, J. A. M., Zicker, F., Novaes, M. R. C. G., Oliveira, C Md, et al. (2019). Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. PLoS ONE,14(4), e0214272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H. (2013). Global research integrity training. Science,340, 552–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. M., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Torrence, B. S., Turner, M. R., Connelly, S., et al. (2017). A meta-analytic comparison of face-to-face and online delivery in ethics instruction: The case for a hybrid approach. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(6), 1719–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2018). Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: Comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,43(5), 745–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education,37, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic review of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior,27(5), 351–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miri Barak.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barak, M., Green, G. Novice Researchers’ Views About Online Ethics Education and the Instructional Design Components that May Foster Ethical Practice. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 1403–1421 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00169-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00169-1

Keywords

Navigation