Abstract
In this article we summarise some previously described proposals for ethical governance of autonomous vehicles (‘smart cars’), critique them, and offer an alternative solution. Rather than programming cars to react to crash situations in the same way as humans, having humans program pre-set responses for a wide range of different potential scenarios, or applying particular ethical theories, we suggest that decisions should be made jointly between humans and cars. Given that humans lack the requisite processing capacity, and computers lack the necessary ethical capacity, the medical paradigm of advance care planning can be retooled for this new context. Advance car-crash planning provides a way to combine humans’ ethical preferences with the advanced data processing capacities of computers to enable shared decision making in collision situations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., et al. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
Borenstein, J., Herkert, J. R., & Miller, K. W. (2019). Self-driving cars and engineering ethics: The need for a system level analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0 Epub 2017 Nov 13 PMID: 29134429.
Davies, A. (2016). https://www.wired.com/2016/02/the-case-for-making-self-driving-cars-think-like-humans/ (Accessed 3/2/21)
Himmelreich, J. (2018). Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21, 669–684.
Leben, D. (2017). A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics and Information Technology, 19, 107–115.
Merecz-Kot, D., Wężyk, A., Waszkowska, M., & Andysz, A. (2020). Shame, guilt, time perspective, time of imprisonment and PTSD symptoms in sentenced motor vehicle accidents perpetrators - a preliminary report. Psychiatria Polska, 54(6), 1163–1180.
Morris, D. (2016). Mercedes-Benz’s Self-Driving Cars Would Choose Passenger Lives Over Bystanders https://fortune.com/2016/10/15/mercedes-self-driving-car-ethics/ (Accessed 3/2/21)
Sand, M. (2021). A defence of the control principle. Philosophia, 49, 765–775.
Santoni de Sio, F. (2017). Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity. Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 20, 411–429.
Schneble, C., & Shaw, D. (2021). Driver’s views on driverless vehicles: Public perspectives on defining and using autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 11, 100446.
Shaw, D., Favrat, B., & Elger, B. (2020). Automated vehicles, big data and public health. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy., 23(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09903-9
Sudore, R. L., Lum, H. D., You, J. J., et al. (2017). Defining advance care planning for adults: A consensus definition from a multidisciplinary delphi panel. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 53(5), 821-832.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331
Soltanzadeh, S., Galliott, J., & Jevglevskaja, N. (2020). Customizable ethics settings for building resilience and narrowing the responsibility gap: Case studies in the socio-ethical engineering of autonomous systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2693–2708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00221-5
Funding
This paper was funded by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation as part of the Spark programme for the ARC (Autonomous Responsible Cars) project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, D.M., Schneble, C.O. Advance Car-Crash Planning: Shared Decision Making between Humans and Autonomous Vehicles. Sci Eng Ethics 27, 75 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00358-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00358-x