Abstract
The species–area relationship (SAR) is known to overestimate species extinction but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear to a great extent. Here, I show that when total species number in an area is unknown, the SAR model exaggerates the estimation of species extinction. It is proposed that to accurately estimate species extinction caused by habitat destruction, one of the principal prerequisites is to accurately total the species numbers presented in the whole study area. One can better evaluate and compare alternative theoretical SAR models on the accurate estimation of species loss only when the exact total species number for the whole area is clear. This presents an opportunity for ecologists to simulate more research on accurately estimating Whittaker’s gamma diversity for the purpose of better predicting species loss.
References
Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9:95–99
Chen Y (2013a) Species–area relationship is overestimated using distributional range maps. Theor Biol Forum 106:17–21
Chen Y (2013b) The biases of utilizing species’ range maps to identify priority areas for conservation. Econ J 4:21–30
Fattorini S, Borges P (2012) Species–area relationships underestimate extinction rates. Acta Oecol 40:27–30
Grilli J, Azaele S, Banavar J, Maritan A (2012) Spatial aggregation and the species–area relationship across scales. J Theor Biol 313:87–97
He F, Hubbell S (2011) Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature 473:368–371
He F, Hubbell S (2012) Geometry and scale in species–area relationships; extinction and climate change: a reply. Nature 482:E5–E6
He F, Hubbell S (2013) Estimating extinction from species–area relationships: why the numbers do not add up? Ecology 94:1905–1912
Liu H, Lin Z, Teng W, Liang R (2007) The mechanism of species extinction under habitat destruction at different rates. Acta Ecol Sin 27:2410–2418
May R, Lawton J, Stork N (1995) Assessing extinction rates. In: Lawton J, May R (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–24
Plotkin JB, Potts MD, Leslie N, Manokaran N, Lafrankie J, Ashton PS (2000) Species–area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. J Theor Biol 207:81–99
Rosenzweig M (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Triantis K, Mylonas M, Whittaker R (2008) Evolutionary species–area curves as revealed by single-island endemics: insights for the interprovincial species–area relationship. Ecography 31:401–407
Triantis K, Borges PAV, Ladle R, Hortal J, Cardoso P, Gaspar C, Dinis F, Mendonca E, Silveira L, Gabriel R, Melo C, Santos A (2010) Extinction debt on oceanic islands. Ecography 33:285–294
Whittaker R (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251
Wurtz P, Annila A (2008) Roots of diversity relations. J Biophys 2008:654672
Wurtz P, Annila A (2010) Ecological succession as an energy dispersal process. BioSystems 100:70–78
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful to Profs. Jürgen Jost, Arto Annila and another anonymous reviewer for their comments, which helped to improve the quality of earlier versions of the manuscript. I am very appreciative to Kimberly Low and Dr. Rana Sarfraz for their helps with polishing the language. This work was done with the support of the University of British Columbia and China Scholarship Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y. Estimation of species extinction: what are the consequences when total species number is unknown?. Theory Biosci. 133, 175–178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-014-0202-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-014-0202-2