Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamics of three-point boundary value problems with Gudermannian neural networks

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study articulates a novel heuristic computing design with artificial intelligence algorithm by manipulating the models with Feed forward (FF) Gudermannian neural networks (GNN) accomplished with global search capability of Genetic algorithms (GA) combined with rapid local convergence of Active-set method (ASM), i.e., FF-GNN-GAASM for solving the second kind of Three-point singular boundary value problems (TPS-BVPs). The proposed FF-GNN-GAASM intelligent computing solver integrated into the hidden layer structure of FF-GNN systems of differential operatives of the second kind of STP-BVPs, which are linked to form the error based Merit function (MF). The MF is optimized with the hybrid-combined heuristics of GAASM. The stimulation for presenting this research work comes from the objective to introduce a reliable framework that associates the operational features of NNs to challenge with such inspiring models. Three different measures of the second kind of TPS-BVPs is applied to assess the robustness, correctness and usefulness of the designed FF-GNN-GAASM. Statistical evaluations through the performance of FF-GNN-GAASM is validated via consistent stability, accuracy and convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma, R., 1999. Positive solutions for a nonlinear three-point boundary-value problem.

  2. Gupta CP (1992) Solvability of a three-point nonlinear boundary value problem for a second order ordinary differential equation. J Math Anal Appl 168(2):540–551

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Q, Jiang D (2008) Upper and lower solutions method and a second order three-point singular boundary value problem. Comput Math Appl 56(4):1059–1070

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Geng F (2009) Solving singular second order three-point boundary value problems using reproducing kernel Hilbert space method. Appl Math Comput 215(6):2095–2102

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal RP et al (2003) Two-point higher-order BVPs with singularities in phase variables. Comput Math Appl 46(12):1799–1826

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabir Z, Raja M (2014) Numeric treatment of nonlinear second order multi-point boundary value problems using ANN, GAs and sequential quadratic programming technique. Int J Ind Eng Comput 5(3):431–442

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arqub OA, Rashaideh H (2018) The RKHS method for numerical treatment for integrodifferential algebraic systems of temporal two-point BVPs. Neural Comput Appl 30(8):2595–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pourakbar M, Zanjirani F, Asgari N (2007) A joint economic lot-size model for an integrated supply network using genetic algorithm. Appl Math Comput 189(1):583–596

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Michalewicz Z, Janikow CZ (1991) Genetic algorithms for numerical optimization. Stat Comput 1:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rizk-Allah RM, Hassanien AE (2020) A hybrid Harris hawks-Nelder-Mead optimization for practical nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Evol Intel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00497-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chakraverty S, Mall S (2020) Single layer Chebyshev neural network model with regression-based weights for solving nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Evol Intel 13:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00383-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S Tomasiello , JE Macías-Díaz, A Khastan, Z Alijani 2019 New sinusoidal basis functions and a neural network approach to solve nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm integral equations, ,Neural Computing and Applications, 1–14

  13. Tomasiello S, Macías-Díaz JE, Khastan A et al (2019) New sinusoidal basis functions and a neural network approach to solve nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm integral equations. Neural Comput Appl 31:4865–4878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03984-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Umar M, Sabir Z, Amin F, Guirao JL, Raja MAZ (2020) Stochastic numerical technique for solving HIV infection model of CD4+ T cells. Eur Phys J Plus 135(6):403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Momani S, Abo-Hammour ZS, Alsmadi OMK (2016) Solution of inverse kinematics problem using genetic algorithms. Appl Math Infor Sci 10(1):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Umar M et al (2019) Intelligent computing for numerical treatment of nonlinear prey–predator models. Appl Soft Comput 80:506–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaff JC et al (2016) Numerical approach to spatial deterministic-stochastic models arising in cell biology. PLoS Comput Biol 12(12):e1005236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabir Z, Raja MAZ, Umar M, Shoaib M (2020) Neuro-swarm intelligent computing to solve the second-order singular functional differential model. Eur Phys J Plus 135(6):474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sabir Z, Wahab HA, Umar M, Erdoğan F (2019) Stochastic numerical approach for solving second order nonlinear singular functional differential equation. Appl Math Comput 363:124605

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Effati S, Pakdaman M (2010) Artificial neural network approach for solving fuzzy differential equations. Inf Sci 180(8):1434–1457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sabir Z et al (2018) Neuro-heuristics for nonlinear singular Thomas-Fermi systems. Appl Soft Comput 65:152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raja MAZ et al (2018) A new stochastic computing paradigm for the dynamics of nonlinear singular heat conduction model of the human head. Eur Phys J Plus 133(9):364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raja MAZ et al (2016) Stochastic numerical solver for nanofluidic problems containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Soft Comput 38:561–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmad I, Ahmad S, Awais M et al (2018) Neuro-evolutionary computing paradigm for Painlevé equation-II in nonlinear optics. Eur Phys J Plus 133(5):184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raja MAZ et al (2019) Numerical solution of doubly singular nonlinear systems using neural networks-based integrated intelligent computing. Neural Comput Appl 31(3):793–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell M, Holland JH, Forrest S (2014) Relative building-block fitness and the building block hypothesis. D. Whitley Foundations Genetic Algorithms 2:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JC, Lin WM, Liao GC, Tsao TP (2011) Quantum genetic algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects and including wind power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(2):189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anbarasi M, Anupriya E, Iyengar NCSN (2010) Enhanced prediction of heart disease with feature subset selection using genetic algorithm. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(10):5370–5376

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raja MAZ, Umar M, Sabir Z, Khan JA, Baleanu D (2018) A new stochastic computing paradigm for the dynamics of nonlinear singular heat conduction model of the human head. Eur Phys J Plus 133(9):364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoque, M.S., Mukit, M., Bikas, M. and Naser, A., 2012. An implementation of intrusion detection system using genetic algorithm. arXiv preprint

  31. Chung YG, Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Li P, Leperi KT, Deria P, Zhang H, Vermeulen NA, Stoddart JF, You F, Hupp JT, Farha OK (2016) In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO2 capture using a genetic algorithm. Sci Adv 2(10):e1600909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arabali A, Ghofrani M, Etezadi-Amoli M, Fadali MS, Baghzouz Y (2013) Genetic-algorithm-based optimization approach for energy management. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 28(1):162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Alaidarous ES, Syam MI (2017) Design of bio-inspired heuristic technique integrated with interior-point algorithm to analyze the dynamics of heartbeat model. Appl Soft Comput 52:605–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gai K, Qiu M and Zhao H, 2017 Cost-aware multimedia data allocation for heterogeneous memory using genetic algorithm in cloud computing. IEEE transactions on cloud computing.

  35. Ball MG, Qela B and Wesolkowski S 2016. A Review of the Use of Computational Intelligence in the Design of Military Surveillance Networks. In Recent Advances in Computational Intelligence in Defense and Security (pp. 663–693). Springer International Publishing.

  36. You C, Li CG, Robinson DP and Vidal R 2016 Oracle based active set algorithm for scalable elastic net subspace clustering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 3928–3937).

  37. Yang H, Yang C, Sun S (2016) Active-set reduced-space methods with nonlinear elimination for two-phase flow problems in porous media. SIAM J Sci Comput 38(4):B593–B618

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Deuerlein JW, Piller O, Elhay S, Simpson AR (2019) Content-Based Active-Set Method for the Pressure-Dependent Model of Water Distribution Systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 145(1):04018082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Klaučo M, Kalúz M, Kvasnica M (2019) Machine learning-based warm starting of active set methods in embedded model predictive control. Eng Appl Artif Intell 77:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tu S, Defourny B (2019) An active-set strategy to solve Markov decision processes with good-deal risk measure. Optimization Letters 13(6):1239–1257

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Gao Y, Song H, Wang X, Zhang K (2020) Primal-dual active set method for pricing American better-of option on two assets. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numerical Simulation 80:104976

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu H, He F, Pan Y (2020) A scalable region-based level set method using adaptive bilateral filter for noisy image segmentation. Multimedia Tools Appl 79(9):5743–5765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xiao M, Zhang J, Gao L (2020) A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 199:106935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Swathika OG, Das A, Gupta Y, Mukhopadhyay S and Hemamalini S 2017 Optimization of overcurrent relays in microgrid using interior point method and active set method. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (pp. 89–97). Springer, Singapore.

  45. Guerrero SY, Sabir Z, Günerhan H, Baskonus HM (2020) Analytical and Approximate Solutions of a Novel Nervous Stomach Mathematical Model. Discrete Dynamics Nat Soc 2020:1–9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Sanchez, Y.G., Sabir, Z. and Guirao, J.L., 2020. Design of a nonlinear SITR fractal model based on the dynamics of a novel coronavirus (COVID).

  47. Umar M, Sabir Z, Imran A, Wahab AH, Shoaib M, Raja MAZ (2020) The 3-D flow of Casson nanofluid over a stretched sheet with chemical reactions, velocity slip, thermal radiation and Brownian motion. Thermal Sci 24:2929–2939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sabir Z, Guirao JL, Saeed T and Erdoğan F Design of a novel second order prediction differential model and solved by using Adams and explicit Runge-Kutta numerical methods.

  49. Wahab HA, Zhiyu Z, Shoaib M, Raja MAZ, Imran A, Sabir Z, Umar M, Akhtar R (2019) Numerical Treatment for the Three-Dimensional Eyring-Powell Fluid Flow over a Stretching Sheet with Velocity Slip and Activation Energy. Adv Math Phys 2019:1–12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed R. Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors have worked in an equal sense to obtain these results.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabir, Z., Ali, M.R., Raja, M.A.Z. et al. Dynamics of three-point boundary value problems with Gudermannian neural networks. Evol. Intel. 16, 697–709 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00695-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00695-7

Keywords

Navigation