Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FINDER: A D2D based critical communications framework for disaster management in 5G

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public Safety Network communications technologies are at crossroads with next-generation networks to render better solutions and applications that can manage disaster efficiently. The fifth generation (5G) network is poised to have a guaranteed network connection, even in the case of partial dysfunction of cellular infrastructure due to disaster. In this paper, we have designed a framework named FINDER (Finding Isolated Nodes using D2D for Emergency Response) to locate-and-reconnect the isolated Mobile Nodes (MNs) in the disaster zone, so that the damage to assets and loss of life can be minimized. If the cellular link is non-existent over a disaster, the MNs under the impaired Base Station (BS) switch to the Device-to-Device (D2D) communications mode, and a critical D2D network is formed. The MNs in the disaster zone can reach an active network through a neighboring BS or a Wi-Fi access point. A multi-hop D2D communications based on hybrid Ant Colony Optimization is adopted to increase the energy efficiency of individual nodes and the overall network lifetime. Further, dynamic clustering curtails the numbers of active participating nodes, and data aggregation shrinks the number of packets in the network. Assistance from the Software-Defined Networking (SDN) controller at the BS benefits to have an intelligent and reliable connectivity to the MNs in the disaster zone. Our proposal FINDER is implemented using MATLAB, and the simulation results show that our framework extends the network lifetime with improved message delivery probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumbhar A, Koohifar F, Guvenc I, Mueller B (2017) A survey on legacy and emerging technologies for public safety communications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 19(1):97–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 3GPP TS 23.203 (2015) Policy and charging control architecture, v13.4.0

  3. Fodor G, Parkvall S, Sorrentino S, Wallentin P, Lu Q, Brahmi N (2014) Device-to-Device communications for national security and public safety. IEEE Access 2:1510–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asadi A, Wang Q, Mancuso V (2014) A survey on device-to-device communication in cellular networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 16(4):1801–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mumtaz S, Rodriguez J (2014) Smart device to smart device communication. Springer International Publishing, Cham. ISBN: 9783319049632

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Gandotra P, Jha RK (2016) Device-to-Device communication in cellular networks: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 71:99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eriksson M, Olsson E-K (2016) Facebook and twitter in crisis communication: a comparative study of crisis communication professionals and citizens. J Conting Crisis Manag 24(4):198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishiyama H, Ito M, Kato N (2014) Relay-by-smartphone: realizing multihop Device-to-Device communications. IEEE Commun Mag 52(4):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunukumbure M, Moulsley T, Oyawoye A, Vadgama S, Wilson M (2013) D2D for energy efficient communications in disaster and emergency situations. In: 21st international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks - (SoftCOM 2013), pp 1–5

  10. Ahmad H, Agiwal M, Saxena N, Roy A (2017) D2D-based survival on sharing for critical communications. Wirel Netw 24(6):2283–2295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Hourani A, Kandeepan S, Jamalipour A (2016) Stochastic geometry study on Device-to-Device communication as a disaster relief solution. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(5):3005–3017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paulson A, Schwengler T (2013) A review of public safety communications, from LMR to voice over LTE (voLT E). In: 2013 IEEE 24th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communications, (PIMRC), pp 3513–3517

  13. Sakano T, Kotabe S, Komukai T, Kumagai T, Shimizu Y, Takahara A, Ngo T, Fadlullah ZM, Nishiyama H, Kato N (2016) Bringing movable and deployable networks to disaster areas: development and field test of MDRU. IEEE Netw 30(1):86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vergne A, Decreusefond L, Martins P (2015) Simplicial homology for future cellular networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 14(8):1712–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Altay C, Bozdemir NZ, Camcioglu E (2016) Standalone eNode-B design with integrated virtual EPC in public safety networks. In: NOMS 2016 - IEEE/IFIP network operations and management symposium, pp 731–734

  16. Xiao L, Fuja T, Costello DJ (2010) Mobile relaying: coverage extension and throughput enhancement. IEEE Trans Commun 58(9):2709–2717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrews JG, Baccelli F, Ganti RK (2011) A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks. IEEE Trans Commun 59(11):3122–3134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhillon HS, Ganti RK, Baccelli F, Andrews JG (2012) Modeling and analysis of K-Tier downlink heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 30(3):550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cacciapuoti AS, Calabrese F, Caleffi M, Lorenzo GD, Paura L (2012) Human-mobility enabled networks in urban environments: is there any (mobile wireless) small world out there? Ad Hoc Netw 10(8):1520–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cacciapuoti AS, Calabrese F, Caleffi M, Lorenzo GD, Paura L (2013) Human-mobility enabled wireless networks for emergency communications during special events. Pervasive Mob Comput 9(4):472–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Rimawi A, Dardari D (2015) Analytical modeling of D2D communications over cellular networks. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 2117–2122

  22. Babun L, Yurekli AI, Guvenc I (2015) Multi-hop and D2D communications for extending coverage in public safety scenarios. In: 2015 IEEE 40th local computer networks conference workshops (LCN Workshops), pp 912–919

  23. Ali K, Nguyen HX, Shah P, Vien Q-T, Ever E (2017) D2D multi-hop relaying services towards disaster communication system. In: 2017 24th international conference on telecommunications (ICT), pp 1–5

  24. Jingyi Z, Xi L, Quansheng X (2015) Multi-hop routing for energy-efficiency enhancement in relay-assisted Device-to-Device communication. J China Univ Posts Telecommun 22(2):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaikh FS, Wismuller R (2018) Routing in multi-hop cellular Device-to-Device (D2D) networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2848108

  26. Tehrani MN, Uysal M, Yanikomeroglu H (2014) Device-to-Device communication in 5G cellular networks: challenges, solutions, and future directions. IEEE Commun Mag 52(5):86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yau KLA, Ramli N, Hashim W, Mohamad H (2014) Clustering algorithms for cognitive radio networks: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 45:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Usman M, Gebremariam AA, Raza U, Granelli F (2015) A software-defined device-to-device communication architecture for public safety applications in 5G networks. IEEE Access 3:1649–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anbalagan S, Kumar D, Ghosal D, Raja G, Muthuvalliammai V (2017) SDN-assisted learning approach for data offloading in 5G HetNets. Mobile Netw Appl 22(4):771–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Feng D, Yu G, Xiong C, Yuan-Wu Y, Li GY, Feng G, Li S (2015) Mode switching for energy-efficient Device-to-Device communications in cellular networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 14(12):6993–7003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Asadi A, Mancuso V (2017) Network-assisted outband D2D-clustering in 5G cellular networks: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 16(8):2246–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohajerani A, Gharavian D (2015) An ant colony optimization based routing algorithm for extending network lifetime in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 22(8):2637–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang H, Wang X, Memarmoshrefi P, Hogrefe D (2017) A survey of ant colony optimization based routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Access 5:24139–24161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bista BB (2016) Improving energy consumption of epidemic routing in delay tolerant networks. In: 10th international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing (IMIS), pp 278–283

Download references

Acknowledgements

Anil Thomas and Gunasekaran Raja would like to thank NGNLab, Department of Computer Technology, Anna University, Chennai, for the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Thomas.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, A., Raja, G. FINDER: A D2D based critical communications framework for disaster management in 5G. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 12, 912–923 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0689-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0689-2

Keywords

Navigation