Skip to main content
Log in

GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

GIS and Remote Sensing have proved to be an indispensible tool in morphometric analysis. The identification of morphometric properties based on a geographic information system (GIS) was carried out in two watersheds in the Thrissur district of Kerala, India. These watersheds are parts of Western Ghats, which is an ecologically sensitive area. Quantitative geomorphometric analysis was carried out for the Chimmini and Mupily watersheds independently by estimating their (a) linear aspects like stream number, stream order, stream length, mean stream length, stream length ratio, bifurcation ratio, length of overland flow, drainage pattern (b) aerial aspects like circulatory ratio, elongation ratio, drainage density and (c) relief aspects like basin relief, relief ratio, relative relief and ruggedness number. The drainage areas of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds are 140 and 122 km2 respectively and show patterns of dendritic to sub-dendritic drainage. The Chimmini watershed was classified as a sixth order drainage basin, whereas Mupily watershed was classified as a fifth order basin. The stream order of the basin was predominantly controlled by physiographic and structural conditions. The increase in the stream length ratio from lower to higher order suggests that the study area has reached a mature geomorphic stage. The development of stream segments is affected by rainfall and local lithology of the watersheds. The slope of both watersheds varied from 0° to 50° and 0° to 42° respectively and the slope variation is chiefly controlled by the local geology and erosion cycles. Moreover, these studies are useful for planning rain water harvesting and watershed management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JI (1996) Morphometry from maps. Essays in geomorphology. Elsevier Publ. Co., New York, pp 235–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley RF, Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River Basin. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1531-B, pp 198

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; Hydrophysical approach to quantative morphology. Bull Geo Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2010) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0860-4

  • Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumam, Argentina). J Environ Geol 50(8):1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Tech Rept 3 Columbia University Department of Geology, ONR Geography Branch New York

  • Morisawa M (1985) Geomorphology texts books: rivers, forms and process, Chapter 5, “Structural and lithological control”

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in bad lands at Perth Amboy. New Jersey, Bull Geol Sac Am 67:597–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the great plains. Geol Soc Am Bull 74:1089–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Shakeel A (2005) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. J Environ Geol 47(3):412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Hand book of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Magesh.

Additional information

Communicated by: Hassan A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magesh, N.S., Jitheshlal, K.V., Chandrasekar, N. et al. GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India. Earth Sci Inform 5, 111–121 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-012-0101-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-012-0101-3

Keywords

Navigation