Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of GLONASS performance in differential positioning

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With GLONASS completed its full constellation and the rapid increasing number of GNSS receivers, it is worthwhile to investigate the availability of GLONASS-only in positioning. In this paper, two networks of different baseline length, located in two different regions are analyzed. For both networks, GLONASS and GPS observations are processed respectively for 175 days since GLONASS recovered FOC. The RMS and STD of the coordinates minus those from the International GNSS Service weekly solutions are analyzed. The statistics over a long period empirically demonstrate that the averaged coordinate repeatabilities of GLONASS are slightly worse than that of GPS results. The estimated ZTDs of GLONASS is about 1–2 mm worse than GPS results. For both networks, the GLONASS coordinates show some systematic effect as a function of antenna + radome type, caused by the using of GPS derived PCC models. The systematic effect varied form several mm to 1 cm for different stations with different antenna + radome types, which indicates that GLONASS-specific PCC models are mandatory in GLONASS high precision positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcay S (2012) Contribution of GLONASS Observations on Precise Point Positioning FIG Working Week 2012, Knowing to manage the territory, protect the environment, evaluate the cultural heritage Rome, Italy, 6–10 May

  • Alcay S, Inal C, Yigit CO, Yetkin M (2012) Comparing GLONASS-only with GPS-only and hybride positioning in various length of baselines. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 47(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyninx C (2007) Comparing GPS-only with GPS + GLONASS positioning in a regional permanent GNSS network. GPS Solutions 11:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Gao Y (2007) Precise point positioning using combined GPS and GLONASS observations. J Glob Positioning Syst 6(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2007) Bernese GPS software version 5.0, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern

  • Dach R, Brockmann E, Schaer S, Beutler G, Meindl M, Prange L, Bock H, Jäggi A, Ostini L (2009) GNSS processing at CODE: status report. J Geod 83:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Schmid R, Schmitz M, Thaller D, Schaer S, Lutz S, Steigenberger P, Wübbena G, Beutler G (2011) Improved antenna phase center models for GLONASS. GPS Solution 15:49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons G (2009) What Race? What Competition. GNSS WORLD. March/April. 16–17

  • Mirgorodskaya T, Revnivykh S (2011) GLONASS Status and Plans. 2nd China Conference on Satellite Navigation, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, 18–20 May

  • Oleynik E (2011) GLONASS Status and Modernization. United Nations/Latvia Workshop on the Applications of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. 14–18, May

  • Oleynik E, Revnivykh S (2011) GLONASS Status and Modernization. Civil GPS Service Interface Committee, Portland, Oregon, 19 September

  • Revnivykh S (2007) GLONASS Status, Development and Application. International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (ICG) Second Meeting, Bangalore, India, 4–7 September

  • Russian Federation (2007) Status of the glonass system and its use within GNSS. International Civil Aviation Organization WORKING PAPER

  • Stewart MP, Tsakiri M, Wang J, Monico JF (1999) The contribution of GLONASS measurements to regional and continental scale geodetic monitoring regimes. International Symposium on GPS - Applications to Earth Sciences and Interaction with Other Space Geodetic Techniques (GPS99) , Tsukuba, Japan, 19–22 Oct

  • URL1 http://www.glonass-ianc.rsa.ru/

  • URL2 http://facility.unavco.org/software/teqc/teqc.html

  • Wang J, Wang J (2007) Comparing Long Baseline Results from GPS and GPS/GLONASS. Combined Int. Symp. and Exhibition on Geoinformation and NGSS, Johor bahru, Malaysia, paper 59

  • Zinoviev AE (2005) Using GLONASS in Combined GNSS Receivers: Current Status. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2005, Long Beach, CA, 13–16 September

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 41074023 and 41004014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guigen Nie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, Y., Nie, G., Fang, R. et al. Investigation of GLONASS performance in differential positioning. Earth Sci Inform 5, 189–199 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-012-0108-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-012-0108-9

Keywords

Navigation