Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of robust estimation in GPS networks using the Artificial Bee Colony algorithm

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geodesy utilizes state of the art data collection techniques such as GPS (Global Positioning System) to acquire locations of points. Traditionally, the coordinates of these points are estimated using the Least Squares (LS) method. Nevertheless, Robust Estimation (RE) yields more accurate results than LS method in the presence of blunders (gross errors) among the data set. For example, the Least Trimmed Squares (LTS) method and the Least Median Squares (LMS) method can be used for this purpose. The first method aims to minimize the sum of the squared residuals by trimming away observations with large residuals. On the other hand, the second method involves the minimization of the median of the squared residuals. Both methods can be implemented using an optimization method, i.e., Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm. The ABC algorithm is a swarm intelligence (a branch of artificial intelligence) technique that can be used for the solution of minimization or maximization problems. In this paper, using the LTS and LMS methods for GPS data by employing the ABC, a new approach is put forward. Firstly, some discussions about the theoretical principals of RE and ABC are given. Then, a numerical example is used to demonstrate the validity of the proposed approach. Numerical results show that application of the robust estimation to GPS data can easily be carried out by ABC and this approach helps to enhance the reliability of geospatial data for any application of geodesy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baselga S (2007) Global optimization solution of robust estimation. J Surv Eng 133(3):123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga S, Garcia-Asenjo L (2008a) GNSS differential positioning by robust estimation. J Surv Eng 134(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga S, Garcia-Asenjo L (2008b) Global robust estimation and its application to GPS positioning. Comput Math Appl 56(3):709–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga S, Garcia-Asenjo L (2008c) Multipath mitigation by global robust estimation. J Navig 61(3):385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Berber M, Hekimoglu S (2003) What is the reliability of conventional outlier detection and robust estimation in trilateration networks? Surv Rev 37(290):308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D (2005) Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Inform 19(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D (2007) A modified shuffled frog-leaping optimization algorithm: applications to project management. Struct Infrastruct Eng 3(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghilani CD, Wolf PR (2006) Adjustment computations: spatial data analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1964) Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann Math Stat 35(2):73–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report-TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department

  • Karaboga D, Akay B (2009) A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Appl Math Comput 214:108–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39(3):459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaboga D, Basturk B (2008) On the performance of Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw PJ (1984) Least median of squares regression. J Am Stat Assoc 79(388):871–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P (2005) Sign-constrained robust least squares, subjective breakdown point and the effects of weights of observations on robustness. J Geodesy Berlin 79(1–3):146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetkin M (2013) Metaheuristic optimisation approach for designing reliable and robust geodetic networks. Surv Rev 45(329):136–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetkin M, Berber M (2013) Application of the sign-constrained robust least squares method to surveying networks. J Surv Eng 139(1):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetkin M, Inal C (2011) L1 norm minimization in GPS networks. Surv Rev 43(323):523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetkin M, Inal C, Yigit C (2009) Use of the particle swarm optimization for second order design of leveling networks. J Appl Geodesy 3:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Mei C (2011) Local least absolute deviation estimation of spatially varying coefficient models: robust geographically weighted regression approaches. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(9):1467–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mevlut Yetkin.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yetkin, M., Berber, M. Implementation of robust estimation in GPS networks using the Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Earth Sci Inform 7, 39–46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-013-0131-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-013-0131-5

Keywords

Navigation