Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating leaf chlorophyll contents by combining multiple spectral indices with an artificial neural network

  • Methodology Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 15 September 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Estimating leaf chlorophyll contents through leaf reflectance spectra is efficient and nondestructive, but the actual dataset always based on a single or a few kinds of specific species, has a limitation and instability for a common use. To address this problem, a combination of multiple spectral indices and a model simulated dataset are proposed in this paper. Six spectral indices are selected, including Blue Green Index (BGI), Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI_5), Triangle Vegetation Index (TVI), Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index (CARI), Carotenoid Reflectance Index (CRI) and the green peak reflectance (R525). Both stepwise linear regression (SLR) and back-propagation artificial neural network (ANN) are used to combine the six spectral indices for the estimation of chlorophyll content (Cab). In addition, to overcome the limitation of actual dataset, a “big data” is applied by a within-leaf radiation transfer model (PROSPECT) to generate a large number of simulated samples with varying biochemical and biophysical parameters. 30% of the simulated dataset (SIM30) and an experimental dataset are used for validation. Compared with linear regression method, NN yields better result with R2 = 0.96 and RMSE = 5.80ug.cm−2 for Cab if validated by SIM30, while R2 = 0.95 and RMSE = 6.39ug.cm−2 for SLR. NN also gives satisfactory result with R2 = 0.80 and RMSE = 5.93ug.cm−2 for Cab if validated by LOPEX dataset, however, the SLR only gets 0.72 of R2 and 12.20ug.cm−2 of RMSE. The results indicate that integrating multiple spectral indices can improve the Cab estimating accuracy with a better stability in different kind of species and the model simulated dataset can make up the shortfall of actual measured dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 15 September 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the “European Commission, Joint Research Centre” for providing the LOPEX public dataset.

Funding

This study was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC1201305), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 15dz1207805), and Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant No. 15GWZK0201), and the National Science Foundation of China (No.31500392).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Runhe Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. A. Babaie

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0325-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, P., Shi, R. & Gao, W. Estimating leaf chlorophyll contents by combining multiple spectral indices with an artificial neural network. Earth Sci Inform 11, 147–156 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0319-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0319-1

Keywords

Navigation