Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatio-temporal changes in rate of soil loss and erosion vulnerability of selected region in the tropical forests of Borneo during last three decades

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt has been made to analyze the spatial-temporal characteristics of soil erosion vulnerability and soil loss from the forested region in the north-eastern Borneo, Sarawak, Malaysia during the last three decades (1991–2015) using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) and geographical information systems (GIS). The components of RUSLE such as rainfall erosivity (R), soil erodibility (K), slope-length and steepness (LS), cover management (C) and conservation practice (P) factors were grouped into two categories by keeping one set as temporally changing and others as static. Among them the R and C factors are calculated for the years 1991, 2001 and 2015 whereas the K and LS factors are considered for the single time frame. Because of the forested nature of the study area, the P factor is kept constant for the whole analysis. The R factor and C factor is shown changes in values and its distribution over the years, which reflected in the final soil loss and erosion vulnerability map as a change in the rate of erosion and spatial domain. The analysis of three time slices has shown that the maximum value of the soil loss per unit area i.e. at erosion hotspots, is relatively similar throughout at around 1636 to 1744 t/ha/y. This is the result of maximum values of R factor and C factor i.e. high rainfall erosivity combined with lack of vegetation cover in those hotspots, which are generally steeply sloping terrain. The reclassification of annual soil loss map into erosion vulnerability zones indicated a major increase in the spatial spread of erosion vulnerability from the year 1991 to 2015 with a significant increase in the high and critical erosion areas from 2.3% (1991) to 31.5% (2015). In 1991, over 84% of the study area was under low erosion vulnerability class but by the year 2015 only 12% was under low erosion vulnerability class. Moreover, a dynamic nature in the erosion pattern was found from the year 1991 to 2015 with more linear areas of land associated with higher rate of soil loss and enhanced erosion vulnerability. The linearity in the spatial pattern is correlated with the development of logging roads and logging activities which has been confirmed by the extraction of exposed areas from satellite images of different years of analysis. The findings of the present study has quantified the changes in vegetation cover from dense, thick tropical forest to open mixed type landscapes which provide less protection against erosion and soil loss during the severe rainfall events which are characteristic of this tropical region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angima SD, Stott DE, O’neill MK, Ong CK, Weesies GA (2003) Soil erosion prediction using RUSLE for central Kenyan highland conditions. Agr Ecosyst Environ 97(1):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnoldous HMJ (1980) An approximation of the rainfall factor in the USLE in assessment of Erosion. Wiley Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LC, Foster GR (1987) Storm erosivity using idealized intensity distributions. T. ASAE 30:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas I (1996) The impact of land-use changes, especially logging, shifting cultivation, mining and urbanization on sediment yields in humid tropical Southeast Asia: a review with special reference to Borneo. IAHS publications-series of proceedings and reports-intern Assoc hydrological sciences no 236, pp 463–472

  • Forest Research Institute Malaysia (1999) A guide for estimating surface soil loss using the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) on Forest Land. FRIM Technical Information Handbook No. 25

  • Foster GR, McCool DK, Renard KG, Moldenhauer WC (1981) Conservation of the universal soil loss equation to SI units. J Soil Water Conserv 36:355–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen B, Aalbæk J, Lauridsen PE, Kaas M, Lopdrup U, Veihe A, van der Keur P (2003) Land use and soil erosion in Tikolod, Sabah, Malaysia. ASEAN review of biodiversity and environmental conservation (ARBEC), pp 1–11

  • Hartanto H, Prabhu R, Widayat ASE, Asdak C (2003) Factors affecting runoff and soil erosion: plot-level soil loss monitoring for assessing sustainability of forest management. For Ecol Manag 180:361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaludin H, Lihan T, Ali Rahman Z, Mustapha MA, Idris WMR, Rahim SA (2013) Integration of remote sensing, RUSLE and GIS to model potential soil loss and sediment yield (SY). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 10(4):4567–4596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karydas CG, Sekuloska T, Silleos GN (2009) Quantification and site-specification of the support practice factor when mapping soil erosion risk associated with olive plantations in the Mediterranean island of Crete. Environ Monit Assess 149:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Li G, Valladares GS, Batistella M (2004) Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia, Brazilian Amazonia: using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Land Degrad Dev 15(5):499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmer A (1996) Hydrological effects and nutrient losses of forest plantation establishment on tropical rainforest land in Sabah, Malaysia. J Hydrol 174(1–2):129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojaddadi Rizeei H, Saharkhiz MA, Pradhan B, Ahmad N (2016) Soil erosion prediction based on land cover dynamics at the Semenyih watershed in Malaysia using LTM and USLE models. Geocarto Inter 31(10):1158–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1120354

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986a) Physical basis of the length slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Amer 50(5):1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986b) Modeling erosion and deposition. Topographic effects. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 29(6):1624–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Styczen ME (1998) The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process landf 23(6):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (1974) Estimating regional variations in soil erosion hazard in peninsular Malaysia. Mal Nat J 28:94–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation, Third edn. Blackwell Science Ltd., Hoboken

  • Norsahida BS (2008) Determination of soil erosion parameters for malaysian conditions using remote sensing and geographic information system approach. Unpublished master’s thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, p 179

  • Panagos P, Borrelli P, Meusburger K, Alewell C, Lugato E, Montanarella L (2015) Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale. Land Use Policy 48:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramli R, Bahri ISS (2011) Determination of soil erodiblity, K factor for Sungai Kurau soil series. ESTEEM Academic Journal 7(1):55–65

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE: revised universal soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Freimund JR (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol 157:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Mc Cool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) USDA agricultural handbook no 703, p 404

  • Roose EJ (1977) Application of the universal soil loss equation of Wischmeier and smith in West Africa. In: Greenland DJ, Lal R (eds) Soil conservation and Management in the Humid Tropics. Wiley, London, pp 177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo A (2015) Applying the revised universal soil loss equation model to land use planning for erosion risk in Brunei Darussalam. Australian Planner 52(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle RC, Sasaki S, Otsuki M, Noguchi S, Abdul Rahim N (2004) Sediment pathways in a tropical forest: effects of logging roads and skid trails. Hydrol Process 18:703–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle RC, Ziegler AD, Negishi JN, Nik AR, Siew R, Turkelboom F (2006) Erosion processes in steep terrain—truths, myths, and uncertainties related to forest management in Southeast Asia. For Eco Manag 224(1):199–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Rambabu, Subhash C (1981) Soil loss prediction research in India. Bull. No. T-12/D-9, CSWCR & TI, Dehradun

  • Stadtmueller T (1990) Soil erosion in east Kalimantan, Indonesia. In proceedings of the Fiji symposium. IAHS-AISH Publ 192:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Teh SH (2011) Soil erosion modelling using RUSLE and GIS on Cameron highlands, Malaysia for hydropower development. Unpublished Masters Thesis. University of Iceland, p 74

  • Van der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2000) Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. European Commission, European Soil Bureau

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (1999) Soil erosion risk assessment in Italy. European Commission, Directorate General, Joint Research Centre, Space Applications Institute European Soil Bureau

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH (1971) A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Water Conserv 26:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W, Smith D (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses- a guide to consrvation planning. U.S. Department of Agriculture handbook no. 537

  • Yu B, Rosewell CJ (1996) An assessment of a daily rainfall erosivity model for new South Wales. Australia J Soil Res 34:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof MF, Abdullah R, Azamathulla HM, Zakaria NA, Ghani AAb (2011) Modified soil erodibility factor, K for Peninsular Malaysia soil series. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on managing rivers in the 21st century: sustainable solutions for global crisis of flooding, pollution and water scarcity. Penang, Malaysia, pp 799–808

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Sarawak Energy Berhad for funding this research under the Project “Mapping of Soil Erosion Risk”. They also thank Curtin University Sarawak for facilities and other assistance and the Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID), Malaysia for providing rainfall data. The authors are also thankful to the anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments and suggestions, which improved the quality of manuscript significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Vijith.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vijith, H., Dodge-Wan, D. Spatio-temporal changes in rate of soil loss and erosion vulnerability of selected region in the tropical forests of Borneo during last three decades. Earth Sci Inform 11, 171–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0321-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0321-7

Keywords

Navigation