Abstract
An investigation is presented in this paper to predict Groundwater Level (GWL) by Inclusive Multiple Modelling (IMM) practices, introduced recently by the authors, as a strategy by organising multiple models at three hierarchical levels: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Sugeno Fuzzy Logic (SFL), Neuro-Fuzzy (NF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). The IMM novelty of the study is to investigate a modelling strategy at three hierarchical levels, such that any base models at Level 1 are not reused as the combiner model at Levels 2 and Level 3 and this leads to a number of strategies. The results provide some evidence that (i) combining base models at Levels 2 and 3 enhance the performances compared with those of individual base models at Level 1; and (ii) the results at Level 3 become defensible and thereby suitable for the development of management scenarios. The decline in GWLs is investigated through management scenarios, which show that water use has higher impacts on groundwater level variations in the study area than those by climatic variabilities and this underpins the evidence for the necessity of management plans and strategies for the study area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport (vol 4). Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, p 381
Asadi S, Hassan M, Nadiri A, Dylla H (2014) Artificial intelligence modeling to evaluate field performance of photocatalytic asphalt pavement for ambient air purification. J Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(14):8847–8857
Ayyub BM, McCuen RH (1995) Numerical methods for engineers. Prentice Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, p 362
Behzad M, Asghari K, Coppola EA (2010) Comparative study of SVMs and ANNs in aquifer water level prediction. J Comput Civ Eng 24(5):408–413. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000043
Chang F-J, Chang Y-T (2006) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of water level in reservoir. Adv Water Resour 29:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.04.015
Chitsazan N, Nadiri AA, Tsai FTC (2015) Prediction and structural uncertainty analyses of artificial neural networks using hierarchical Bayesian model averaging. J Hydrol 528:52–62
Chiu SL (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2(3):267–278. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-1994-2306
Clemen RT (1989) Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. Int J Forecast 5:559–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(89)90012-5
Daliakopoulos IN, Coulibaly P, Tsanis IK (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309(1–4):229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.001
Darvishzadeh A (1991) Geology of Iran. Neda Publication, Tehran, p 901
East Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority (2001) Annual report of water balance of Tasuj plain (in Persian)
East Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority. (2016) Annual report of water balance of Tasuj plain (in Persian)
Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13:arXiv:cs/0102027
Gorzalczany MB (2001) Computational intelligence systemsand applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, p 362
Grondman I, Busoniu L, Lopes GAD, Babuška R (2012) A survey of actor-critic reinforcement learning: standard and natural policy gradients. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 42:1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2218595
Haykin SS (1998) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 842
Jalalkamali A, Sedghi H, Manshouri M (2010) Monthly groundwater level prediction using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models: a case study on Kerman plain, Iran. J Hydroinf 13(4):867–876. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2010.034
Jang J-SR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive network-based fuzzyinference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
KadkhodaieIlkhchi A, Amini A (2009) A fuzzy logic approach to estimating hydraulic flow units from well log data: a case study from the Ahwaz oilfield, South Iran. J Pet Geol 32(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2009.00435.x
Kasiviswanathan KS, Saravanan S, Balamurugan M, Saravanan K (2016) Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantification. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0083-0
Khatibi R, Nadiri AA (2021) Inclusive multiple models (IMM) for predicting groundwater levels and treating heterogeneity. Geosci Front 12(2):713–724
Khatibi R, Ghorbani M, Naghshara S, Aydin H, Karimi V (2020) A framework for ‘inclusive multiple modelling’with critical views on modelling practices–applications to modelling water levels of Caspian Sea and Lakes Urmia and Van. J Hydrol 587:124923
Khodabandeh A A and Amini-Fazl A (1993) Geological map of Tasuj sheet (1:100,000); geological survey of Iran
Lallahem S, Mania J, Hani A, Najjar Y (2005) On the use of neural networks to evaluate groundwater levels in fractured media. J Hydrol 307(1):92–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.005
Legates DR, McCabe CJ (1999) Evaluation the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydro climate model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018
Lin GF, Chen GR (2006) An improved neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. J Hydrol 316(1–4):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.023
Moazamnia M, Hassanzadeh Y, Nadiri AA, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S (2019) Formulating a strategy to combine artificial intelligence models using Bayesian model averaging to study a distressed aquifer with sparse data availability. J Hydrol 571:765–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.011
Nadiri A, Hassan MM, Asadi S (2015) Supervised intelligence committee machine to evaluate field performance of photocatalytic asphalt pavement for ambient air purification. Transp Res Rec 2528(1):96–105
Nadiri A (2015) Application of artificial intelligence methods in geosciences and hydrology. OMICS Publication, Hyderabad, p 124
Nadiri AA, Asghari MAA, Tsai FTC, Fijani E (2013a) Hydrogeochemical analysis for Tasuj plain aquifer, Iran. J Earth Syst Sci 122(4):1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0329-4
Nadiri AA, Chitsazan N, Tsai FT-C, Moghaddam AA (2014) Bayesian artificial intelligence model averaging for hydraulic conductivity estimation. J Hydrol Eng 19(3):520–532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000824
Nadiri AA, Fijani E, Tsai FT-C, Asghari Moghaddam A (2013b) Supervised committee machine with artificial intelligence for prediction of fluoride concentration. J Hydroinf 15(4):1474–1490
Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R (2018a) Mapping aquifer vulnerability indices using artificial intelligence-running multiple frameworks (AIMF) with supervised and unsupervised learning. Water Resour Manag 32(9):3023–3040
Nadiri AA, Naderi K, Khatibi R, Gharekhani M (2019) Modelling groundwater level variations by learning from multiple models using fuzzy logic. Hydrol Sci J 64(2):210–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1554940
Nadiri AA, Sedghi Z, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S (2018b) Mapping specific vulnerability of multiple confined and unconfined aquifers by using artificial intelligence to learn from multiple DRASTIC frameworks. J Environ Manag 227:415–428
Nadiri AA, Shokri S, Tsai FT-C, Moghaddam AA (2018c) Prediction of effluent quality parameters of a wastewater treatment plant using a supervised committee fuzzy logic model. J Clean Prod 180:539–549
Nourani V, Moghaddam AA, Nadiri AO (2008a) An ANNbased model for spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting. Hydrol Proc 22(26):5054–5066. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7129
Nourani V, Nadiri AO, Moghaddam AA, Singh VP (2008b) Forecasting spatiotemproal water levels of Tabriz aquifer. Academic Journals Inc Available electronically from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/164642
Raghavendra S, Chandra DP (2014) Support vector machine applications in the field of hydrology: a review. Elsevier Appl Soft Comput 19:372–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.02.002
Sahoo M, Das T, Kumari K, Dhar A (2017) Space–time forecasting of groundwater level using a hybrid soft computing model. Hydrol Sci J 62(4):561–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1252986
Shiri J, Kisi O (2011) Comparison of genetic programming with neuro-fuzzy systems for predicting short-term water table depth fluctuations. Comput Geosci 37(10):1692–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.11.010
Shiri J, Kisi O, Yoon H, Lee K-K, Nazemi AH (2013) Predicting groundwater level fluctuations with meteorological effect implications—a comparative study among soft computing techniques. Comput Geosci 56:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.01.007
Suykens JAK (2000) Least squares support vectormachines for classification and nonlinear modelling. Neural Netw World 10(1–2):29–48 Special issue on PASE 2000
Tayfur G, Nadiri AA, Moghaddam AA (2014) Supervised intelligent committee machine method for hydraulic conductivity estimation. Water Resour Manag 28(4):1173–1184
Theodoridou PG, Varouchakis EA, Karatzas GP (2017) Spatial analysis of groundwater levels using fuzzy logic and geostatistical tools. J Hydrol 555:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.027
Yoon H, Hyun Y, Ha K, Lee K-K, Kim G-B (2016) A method to improve the stability and accuracy of ANN and SVM-based time series models for long-term groundwater level predictions. Comput Geosci 90:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.03.002
Acknowledgements
This research is financially supported by the University of Tabriz through a Grant scheme and it is one of the outputs of the Artificial Intelligence Multiple Models research group team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: H. Babaie
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nadiri, A.A., Razzagh, S., Khatibi, R. et al. Predictive groundwater levels modelling by Inclusive Multiple Modelling (IMM) at multiple levels. Earth Sci Inform 14, 749–763 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00572-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00572-y