Skip to main content
Log in

Using structural equation modelling for investigating the impact of e-business on ICT and non-ICT assets, processes and business performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of adopting an e-business strategy on two organizational characteristics which have gradually become highly important for organizations in the last 20 years, information and communication technology (ICT) assets and business processes, and also on a ‘traditional’ one, the non-ICT (regular) assets, and finally through them on business performance. Its theoretical foundations are the Contingency Theory of Organizations in combination with the Cobb-Douglas Production Function. Advanced quantitative techniques of structural equation modelling (SEM) have been employed, which allow the estimation of complex multi-layer models including mediator variables that are both dependent (i.e. affected by others) and independent (i.e. affecting some others) at the same time, and enable the investigation of complex networks of relationships. Firm-level data collected through a survey of 271 Greek firms have been used for estimating a SEM connecting the above variables. The results show that the adoption of e-business strategy by Greek firms leads to adaptation of their business processes, which has a positive impact on their business performance, but not to additional investment to ICT or non-ICT assets. In particular, e-business drives Greek firms’ processes adaptations aiming mainly to increase the non-hierarchical decentralized coordination within the firm, in order to cope with the higher task complexity and uncertainty that e-business gives rise to, and also to respond to the specific technical and operational requirements that this strategy poses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afuah A, Tucci CL (2001) Internet business models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Mashari M, Zairi M (2000) Revisiting BPR: a holistic review of practice and development. Bus Process Manage J 6(1):10–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Mashari M, Irani Z, Zairi M (2001) Business process reengineering: a survey of international experience. Bus Process Manage J 7(5):437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albadvi A, Keramati A, Razmi J (2007) Assessing the impact of information technology on firm performance considering the role of intervening variables: organizational infrastructures and business process reengineering. Int J Prod Res 12(15):2697–2734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Brooks L (2008) Culture and IS: national cultural dimensions within IS discipline. UKAIS08. Bournemouth University, Bournemouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Altinkemer K, Ozcelik Y, Ozdemir Z (2007) Productivity and performance effects of IT-enabled reengineering: a firm-level analysis. In: European conference of information system 2007 proceedings, St. Gallen, Switzerland

  • Amit R, Zott C (2001) Value creation in e-business. Strateg Manage J 22:493–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JS, Overton T (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(3):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis S (2005) Computerization, workplace organization, skilled labor and firm productivity: evidence for the Swiss business sector. Econ Innov New Technol 14(4):225–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis S, Loukis E (2009) Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labour productivity in greece and switzerland: a comparative study based on firm-level data. Inf Econ Policy 21:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attaran M (2004) Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Inf Manage 41:585–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Konana P, Whinston AB, Yin F (2004) An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Q 28(4):585–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertschek I, Kaiser U (2001) Productivity effects of organizational change: microeconomic evidence. ZEW Discussion Paper, No 01-32, Manheim, Germany

  • Black SE, Lynch LM (2004) What’s driving the new economy?: the benefits of workplace innovation. Econ J 114:97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brech EFL (1957) Organization: the framework of management. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan T, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies–Engines of growth. J Econ 65:83–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan T, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Q J Econ 117:339–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long S (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Manage Sci 42(4):541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1998) Beyond the productivity paradox–Computers are the catalyst for bigger changes. Commun ACM 41(8):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond Computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14(4):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling With AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon JP, Homburg C (2001) Buyer-seller relationships and customer firm costs. J Mark 65(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champy J (2002) X-Engineering the corporation: reinventing your business in the digital age. Warner Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler A (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RG (1992) Assessing non-response bias the right way: a customer satisfaction case study. In: American marketing association summer educators proceedings, pp 322–329

  • Child J (1975) Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance: part 2: a contingency analysis. J Manage Stud 12:12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q 22(1):7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T (1993) Process innovation: re-engineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T, Nohria N (1994) Case management and the integration of labor. Sloan Manage Rev 35(2):11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T, Short J (1990) The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Manage Rev 31(4):11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei JC (2007) Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. J Oper Manage 25(6):1199–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (2001) The contingency theory of organizations. Sage Publications Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) The european e-business report–the impact of ICT and e-business on firms, sectors and the economy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2008) Science, technology and innovation in europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans PB, Wruster TS (1999) Blown to bits: how the new economics of information transforms strategy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT (2002) e-Integration in the supply chain: barriers and performance. Decis Sci 33(4):537–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2002) Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance. J Oper Manage 20(6):729–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau M (2000) Structural equation modelling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4:1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresov C (1990) Effects of dependence and tasks on unit design and efficiency. Organ Stud 11:503–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover V, Teng J, Fiedler K (1993) Information Technology enabled business process redesign: an integrated planning framework. Omega Int J Manage Sci 21(4):433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover V, Teng J, Segars AH, Fiedler K (1998) The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: the IS executive’s perspective. Inf Manage 34:141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes T, Bond W (1996) Empirically assessing the impact of BPR on manufacturing firms. Int J Oper Prod Manage 16(8):5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran A, Nath B (1997) The role of information technology in business process reengineering. Int J Prod Econ 50:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1990) Re-engineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harv Bus Rev 68(4):104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Re-engineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Harper Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldal F, Sjovold E, Heldal AF (2004) Success on the Internet: optimizing relationships through the corporate site. Int J Inf Manage 24(2):115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JC, Venkatraman H (1999) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst J 38(2):472–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DF, Seaman SL (1994) High and low levels of organizational adaptation: an empirical analysis of strategy, structure and performance. Strateg Manage J 15(6):459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G, Scholes K (2006) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases, 7th edn. Financial Times, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PF, Klassen RD, Leenders MR, Awaysheh A (2007) Utilizing e-business technologies in supply chains: the impact of firm characteristics and teams. J Oper Manage 25(6):1255–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaasa A, Vadi M (2010) How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries. Econ Innov New Technol 19(7):583–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambil A, Nunes PF, Wilson D (1999) Transforming the marketplace with all-in-one markets. Int J Electron Commer 3(4):11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner D, Kayworth T (2006) Review: a review of culture in information systems research: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Q 30(2):357–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert R (1961) New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luftman J (2000) Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons MG (1995) The theory, the practice and the future of reengineering. Int J Inf Manag 15(4):253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q 28(2):283–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K (2007) The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: the role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decis Support Syst 43:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1988) Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: analysis and performance implications. Acad Manag J 31(2):280–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1979) The structuring of organizations. A Synthesis of the Research. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Motiwalla L, Khan MR, Xu S (2005) An intra- and inter-industry analysis of e-business effectiveness. Inf Manag 42:651–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson W, Snyder C (2008) Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions, 10th edn. Thomson Higher Education, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill P, Sohal AS (1999) Business process reengineering: a review of recent literature. Technovation 19:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002) Measuring the information economy. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003) ICT and economic growth—Evidence from OECD countries, industries and firms. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004) The economic impact of ICT—measurement, evidence and implications. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008) OECD information technology outlook 2008. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) OECD economic outlook 2009. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010a) The OECD innovation strategy: getting a head start on tomorrow. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010b) Innovation and the development agenda. OECD Publication Service, Paris

  • Pennings JM (1992) Structural contingency theory: a reappraisal. Res Organ Behav 14:267–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Pertusa-Ortega EM, Claver-Cortes E, Molina-Azorin JF (2008) Strategy, structure, environment and performance in Spanish firms. Euromed J Bus 3(2):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan DD (2003) E-business development for competitive advantages: a case study. Inf Manag 40:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan J, Hu Q, Hart PJ (2003) Information technology investments and firms performance-a duopoly perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 20(3):121–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee M, Mehra S (2006) Aligning operations marketing and competitive strategies to enhance performance: an empirical test in the retail banking industry. Omega Int J Manag Sci 34:505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR (2007) An empirical study of the impact of e-business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance. J Oper Manag 25(6):1332–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta P, Meroño-Cerdan AL (2006) An analysis and comparison of web development between local governments and SMEs in Spain. Int J Electron Bus 4(2):191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta P, Meroño-Cerdan A (2008) Analyzing e-Business value creation from a resource-based perspective. Int J Inf Manag 28(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta P, Meroño-Cerdan A (2009) Evaluating Internet technologies business effectiveness. Telemat Inform 26:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield C, Mahler A, Bauer J (1999) Electronic commerce and the local merchant: opportunities for synergy between physical and web presence. Electron Mark 9(2):51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolarick K (1999) IT spending and firm productivity: additional evidence from the manufacturing sector, working Paper, Center for Economic Studies, US Census Bureau, pp 99–10

  • Straub D, Boudreau M, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13:380–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki Y (1980) The strategy and structure of top 100 japanese industrial enterprises 1950–1970. Strateg Manag J 1:265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavlaki E, Loukis E (2005) Business model: a prerequisite for success in the network economy. In: 18th Bled eConference–eIntegration in Action proceedings 2005, June 6–8, Bled, Slovenia

  • Taylor FW (1947) Scientific management. Harper Publications, London and new york

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers P (1998) Business models for electronic markets. Electron Mark 8(2):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban E, Lee J, King D, McKay J, Marshall P (2008) Electronic Commerce—a managerial perspective 2008, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: towards verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):423–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan Z, Fang Y, Wade M (2007) A ten-year odyssey of the ‘IS productivity paradox’–A citation analysis (1996–2006). In: The americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) proceedings 2007, Keystone, Colorado, USA

  • Wu F, Mahajan V, Balasubamanian S (2003) An analysis of e-business adoption and its impacts on business performance. J Acad Mark Sci 31(4):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2002) E-commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inf Syst Res 13(3):275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inf Syst Res 16(1):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Euripidis Loukis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loukis, E., Soto-Acosta, P. & Pazalos, K. Using structural equation modelling for investigating the impact of e-business on ICT and non-ICT assets, processes and business performance. Oper Res Int J 13, 89–111 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-011-0110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-011-0110-x

Keywords

Navigation