Skip to main content
Log in

The duplicate extension for the equal allocation of nonseparable costs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different from the multi-choice extension of the equal allocation of nonseparable costs (EANSC) due to Liao (Econ Bull 3:1–8, 2008), this paper proposes an alternative extension of the EANSC on multi-choice transferable-utility (TU) games. It turns out that the EANSC of a multi-choice TU game coincides with the EANSC of a corresponding “replicated” TU game. Further, we introduce an extended reduced game to characterize this extended EANSC by means of related consistency. Based on the reduced games, a dynamic process is also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A multi-choice TU game, introduced by Hsiao and Raghavan (1992, 1993), is a generalization of a standard TU game.

  2. Formally, the definition of a payoff vector should be as follows. Denote \(M=\{(i,j) | i\in N,j \in M_i \}\). A payoff vector of (Nv) is a function \({x:M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}},\) where, for all \(i\in N\) and \(j\in M_i \backslash \{0\}, x_{ij}\) denotes the increase in payoff to player i corresponding to a change of activity from level j − 1 to level j by this player and x i0 = 0 for all \(i\in N\).

  3. Without loss of generality, we can assume that S(m) = N.

  4. The technique of the proof can be found in Hart and Mas-Colell (1989), p. 599.

  5. λ is a fixed positive number, which reflects the assumption that player i does not ask for full correction (when λ = 1) but only (usually) a fraction of it.

  6. See Moulin (1985).

References

  • Calvo E, Santos JC (2000) A value for multichoice games. Math Soc Sci 40:341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen TSH, Funaki Y (1991) Coincidence of and collinearity between game theoretic solutions. OR Spektrum 13:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1959) A bargaining model for the cooperative n-person game. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contributions to the Theory of Games IV (Annals of Mathematics Studies 40), Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 325–355

  • Hart S, Mas-Colell A (1989) Potential, value and consistency. Econometrica 57:589–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao CR, Raghavan TES (1992) Monotonicity and dummy free property for multi-choice cooperative games. Int J Game Theory 21:301–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao CR, Raghavan TES (1993) Shapley value for multi-choice cooperative game (I). Games Econ Behav 5:240–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang YA, Liao YH (2008) Potentializability and consistency for multi-choice solutions. Span Econ Rev 10:289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang YA, Liao YH (2009) Consistency and dynamic approach of indexes. Soc Choice Welf 34:679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju Y, Wettstein D (2009) Implementing cooperative solution concepts: a generalized bidding approach. Econ Theory 39:307–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao YH (2008) The maximal equal allocation of nonseparable costs on multi-choice games. Econ Bull 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschler M, Owen G (1989) The consistent Shapley value for hyperplane games. Int J Game Theory 18:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1985) The separability axiom and equal-sharing methods. J Econ Theory 36:120–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1995) On additive methods to share joint costs. Jpn Econ Rev 46:303–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransmeier JS (1942) The Tennessee valley authority. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink R, Funaki Y (2009) Axiomatizations of a class of equal surplus sharing solutions for TU-games. Theory Decis 67:303–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Nouweland A, Potters J, Tijs S, Zarzuelo JM (1995) Core and related solution concepts for multi-choice games. ZOR Math Methods Oper Res 41:289–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the editor, the associate editor and the anonymous referees for very helpful suggestions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hsien Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liao, YH. The duplicate extension for the equal allocation of nonseparable costs. Oper Res Int J 13, 385–397 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-012-0127-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-012-0127-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation