Abstract
It has been recognized that long-term effects exist in the interaction with robotic technologies. Despite this recognition, we still know little about how the temporal effects are associated with domestic robots. To bridge this gap, we undertook a long-term field study. We distributed Roomba vacuuming robots to 30 households, and observed the use over six months. During this study, which spans over 149 home visits, we identified how householders accepted robots as a part of the households via four temporal stages of pre-adoption, adoption, adaptation, and use/retention. With these findings, we took the first step toward establishing a framework, Domestic Robot Ecology (DRE). It shows a holistic view on the relationships that robots shape in the home. Further, it articulates how those relationships change over time. We suggest that DRE can become a useful tool to help design toward long-term acceptance of robotic technologies in the home.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown SA (2008) Household technology adoption, use, and impacts: past, present, and future. Inf Syst Front 10(4):397–402
Cowan RS (1976) Industrial revolution in the home. Technol Cult 17(1):1–23
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 35:982–1003
Denning T, Matuszek C, Koscher K, Smith JR, Kohno T (2009) A spotlight on security and privacy risks with future household robots: attacks and lessons. In: Proc of Ubicomp ’09. ACM, New York
Edwards WK, Grinter RE (2001) At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Proc of Ubicomp ’01. Springer, Berlin, pp 256–272
Forlizzi J (2007) How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In: Proc of HRI ’07. ACM, New York, pp 129–136
Forlizzi J (2008) The product ecology: understanding social product use and supporting design culture. http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/220/143
Forlizzi J, DiSalvo C (2006) Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In: Proc of HRI ’06. ACM, New York, pp 258–265
Gockley R, Forlizzi J, Simmons R (2006) Interactions with a moody robot. In: Proc of HRI ’06. ACM, New York, pp 186–193
Ha TS, Jung JH, Oh SY (2006) Method to analyze user behavior in home environment. Pers Ubiq Comput 10:110–121
Huh YE, Kim S-H (2008) Do early adopters upgrade early? Role of post-adoption behavior in the purchase of next-generation products. J Bus Res 61(1):40–46
Huttenrauch H, Eklundh KS (2002) Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot. In: Proc of RO-MAN ’02. IEEE, New York, pp 158–163
Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):962–971
Kiesler S, Hinds P (2004) Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1/2):1–8
Kim H, Lee H, Chung S, Kim C (2007) User-centered approach to path planning of cleaning robots: analyzing user’s cleaning behavior. In: Proc of HRI ’07. ACM, New York, pp 373–380
Lee H, Kim HJ, Kim C (2007) Autonomous behavior design for robotic appliance. In: Proc of HRI ’07. ACM, New York, pp 201–208
Marti P, Pollini A, Rullo A, Shibata T (2005) Engaging with artificial pets. In: Proc of EACE ’05. ACM, New York, pp 99–106
Mutlu B, Forlizzi J (2008) Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In: Proc of HRI ’08. ACM, New York, pp 287–294
Pacchierotti E, Christense HI, Jensfelt P (2006) Design of an office-guide robot for social interaction studies. In: Proc of IROS ’06. IEEE/RSJ, New York, pp 4965–4970
Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York
Shih C-F, Venkatesh A (2004) Beyond adoption: development and application of a use-diffusion model. J Mark 68:59–72
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Sung J-Y, Grinter RE, Christensen HI, Guo L (2008) Housewives or technophiles?: understanding domestic robot owners. In: Proc of HRI ’08. ACM, New York, pp 129–136
Sung J, Christensen HI, Grinter RE (2009) Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. In: Proc of HRI ’09. ACM, New York, pp 45–52
Sung J, Guo L, Grinter RE, Christensen HI (2007) My roomba is rambo: intimate home appliances. In: Proc of Ubicomp ’07. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–162
Tanaka F, Movellan JR, Fortenberry B, Aisaka K (2006) Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments. In: Proc of HRI ’06. ACM, New York, pp 3–9
Venkatesh A (2008) Digital home technologies and transformation of households. Inf Syst Front 10(4):391–395
Venkatesh A (2006) Introduction to the special issue on ICT in everyday life: home and personal environments. Inf Soc 22:191–194
Venkatesh A (1997) New technologies for the home-development of a theoretical model of household adoption and use. Adv Consum Res 24:522–528
Venkatesh A, Kruse E, Shih EC-F (2003) The networked home: an analysis of current developments and future trends. Cogn Technol Work 5(1):23–32
Young JE, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, Igarashi T (2009) Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):95–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sung, J., Grinter, R.E. & Christensen, H.I. Domestic Robot Ecology. Int J of Soc Robotics 2, 417–429 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0065-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0065-8