Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empathy, Education and AI

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of empathy has multiple meanings. In the present paper we present an experiment in which the relationship between empathy and spatial perspective Berthoz and Jorland (L’Empathie, 2004) acquires a significant role in the process of structural coupling Maturana and Varela (The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding, 1992) and Damiano (Unità in dialogo. Un nuovo stile per la conoscenza, 2009). The concept of empathy in education is at the basis of the relation between teacher and students and between teaching and learning. Thus the concepts of co-activity Vinatier and Numa-Bocage (Revue française de pédagogie, 158:85–101, 2007) and of structural coupling have analogies with empathy and can provide operational indications. The research question is the following: is it possible to detect the presence of a structural coupling and of empathic processes in a class of students and their teachers through the mediation of a conceptual space created by an automated AI system? The present contribution analyses the use of an AI plug-in developed within the European project I-TUTOR. In the experiment the artefact plays the role of mediator between the teacher and the students and lets their different perspectives be compared. The artefact does not engage in dialogue with the student in a one-to-one relationship, but it is a vertex of the student-artefact-teacher triangle. The artefact, an automated space, fosters a comparison between the perspective of the student and that of the teacher in relation to the dominant teaching object of the course. The paper describes the findings of the experiment run with two groups of students and proposes some changes to be worked into the plug-in to foster further empathic processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berthoz A, Jorland G (eds) (2004) L’Empathie, 320. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maturana H, Varela F (1992) The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publications, Boston, p 269

  3. Damiano L (2009) Unità in dialogo. Un nuovo stile per la conoscenza. Bruno Mondadori, Milano, p 276

  4. Vinatier I, Numa-Bocage L (2007) Prise en charge d’un enfant difficulté de lecture par un maître spécialisé: gestion de l’intersubjectivité et schème de médiation didactique. Rev Fr Pedag 158:85–101

  5. Laurillard D (2012) Teaching as a design science. Building pedagogical patterns for learning and teaching. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallese V (2003) The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 36:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Accornero M (ed) (2009) Movimento, percezione ed empatia. Mimesis Edizioni, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers C (1951) Client-centered therapy. The Riverside Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jung CG (1977) Tipi psicologici. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold R (2010) The social and emotional aspects of learning: empathy. In: McGaw B, Peterson P, Baker E (eds) The international encyclopedia of education. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bellingreri A (2013) L’empatia come virtù. Il Pozzo di Giacobbe, Trapani

  12. U.S. Department of Education (2010) National Educational Technology Plan, http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-final-report.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2014

  13. Varela F, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pacherie PE (2004) L’empathie et ses degrés. In: Berthoz A, Jorland G (eds) L’Empathie. Odile Jacob, Paris, pp 149–181

  15. Altet M, Bru M, Blanchard Laville C (2012) Observer les pratiques enseignantes. Harmattan, Paris

  16. Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9:625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson AD, Golonka S (2013) Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Front Psychol 4(58):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davis B, Sumara D, Kieren T (1996) Cognition, co-emergence, curriculum. J Curric Stud 28(2):151169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Damiano E (2013) La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Franco Angeli, Milano

  20. Houssaye J (2000) Le triangle pédagogique. Peter Lang, Berne

  21. Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. Merleau-Ponty M (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge Classics, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bruner JS (1966) Toward a theory of instruction. Belkapp Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Giannandrea L, Magnoler P, Rossi PG (2013) APOL. L’Emilio non abita più qui. In: Damiano E (ed) La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 210–283

  25. Paviotti G, Rossi PG, Zarka D (eds) (2012) Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview. Pensa Multimedia, Lecce

    Google Scholar 

  26. Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  27. Willis J (2007) Foundations of qualitative research: interpretive and critical approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lyons J (1997) Semantics, vol II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  29. Levinson SC (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nunberg G (1993) Indexicality and deixis. Linguist Philos 16(1):1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Perconti P (2006) Filosofia della mente. In: Pennisi A, Perconti P (eds) Le scienze cognitive del linguaggio. Il Mulino, Bologna, pp 15–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Giuseppe Rossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossi, P.G., Fedeli, L. Empathy, Education and AI. Int J of Soc Robotics 7, 103–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0272-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0272-9

Keywords

Navigation