Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intersection of “Tokku” Special Zone, Robots, and the Law: A Case Study on Legal Impacts to Humanoid Robots

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unique “Tokku” Special Zone for Robot-ics Empirical Testing and Development (RT special zone) originated in Japan. Since 2003, the world’s first RT special zone had already established in Fukuoka Prefecture, Fukuoka City and Kitakyushu City. At that time, Takanishi Laboratory, Humanoid Robotics Institute of Waseda University had conducted many empirical testing within several different spots of the special zone to evaluate the feasibility for bipedal humanoid robots on public roads from 2004 to 2007. It is also known as the world’s first public roads testing for bipedal robots. The history of RT special zone is merely 10 years long, but there are already many special zones established in Fukuoka, Osaka, Gifu, Kanagawa and Tsukuba. As the development of robotics and its submergence to the society expand, the importance of RT special zone as an interface for robots and society will be more apparent. In this paper, our main focus is to view the impacts of the “Tokku” special zone system to the human-robot co-existence society. We would like to make a systematic review for RT special zone, and further to investigate the relationship between RT special zone, robots and the law through a case study on legal impacts regarding bipedal humanoid robots in which the materials for the case study come from Waseda University’s experiment on WL-16RII and WABIAN-2R at the Fukuoka RT special zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “To-Do-Fu-Ken” is an abbreviation of four kinds of first level of administrative division in Japan, they include To (capital), Do (territory), Fu (urban prefecture), and Ken (prefecture).

  2. http://www.vrtc.co.jp/gift/tokku/tokku.html.

  3. http://www.wabot-house.waseda.ac.jp.

  4. http://www.rt-tsukuba.jp/policy.

  5. http://council.rt-tsukuba.jp/info/2011/04/08/133.

  6. http://www.robotown.eu.

  7. http://www.theroboticschallenge.org.

  8. The data come from non-disclosed documents of Fukuoka City Hall.

  9. The data come from non-disclosed documents of Robotics Industry Development Council (RIDC).

References

  1. Takanishi A (2009) Special Zone for Robot Development and Practical Testing in Japan. Workshop on Legal and Safety Issues Related to Autonomous Networked Robots Operating in Urban Environments, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Kobe, Japan

  2. The Cabinet Secretariat of Japan (2002) Outline of the law on the special zones for structural reform. Cabinet Secretariat, office for the promotion of special zones for structure reform. Available via http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/policy

  3. The Cabinet Secretariat of Japan (2003) Special zones for structure reform. Cabinet Secretariat, office for the promotion of special zones for structure reform. Available via http://www.cao.go.jp/en/minister/specialzones.html

  4. The Cabinet Secretariat of Japan (2002) Outline of the Fukuoka RT special zone for empirical testing and development. Cabinet Secretariat, office for the promotion of special zones for structure reform. Available via http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tiiki/kouzou2/kouhyou/-031222/061 (in Japanese)

  5. National Police Agency (2003) Special Regulations for The Measure for Facilitating Robots’ Experiment on Public Roads (Chou-ki-Hatsu No.63) (in Japanese)

  6. Takanishi A, Sugahara Y, Sunazuka Y, Kawase M, Hashimoto K, Ota A, Tanaka T (2005) The Fukuoka report for robots’ development and practical testing in RT special zones. Humanoid Robotics Institute, Waseda University, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Police Agency (2006) Procedures for the Road Use Permission to Robots’ Experiment on Public Roads (Chou-ki-Hatsu No.3) (in Japanese)

  8. Sugano S, et al. (2003) The WABOT-HOUSE Research Achievement Report. Wabot-House Laboratory (in Japanese) pp 7–55

  9. Kayama K (2006) The Report for Networked Robots and Their Empirical Experiment on Public Road. NiCT (National institute of Communications Technology) News, no. 358 (in Japanese)

  10. Asada M (2005) From synergistic intelligence to RoboCity CoRE. J Robot Soc Jpn 23(8):150–153 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Unsigned Editorial (2011) Tsukuba Comprehensive Special Zone for International Competitive Development. Japanese Government Internet TV. Available via http://nettv.gov-online.go.jp/eng/prg/prg3282.html

  12. The Cabinet Secretariat of Japan (2011) Introduction of comprehensive special zones. Cabinet Secretariat. Available via http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tiiki/sogotoc/siryou/gai-youeng

  13. Inoue K, Rahok SA, Ozaki K (2012) Proposal and consideration of design policy for autonomous mobile robots in real world challenge. J Robot Soc Jpn 30(3):234–244 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirukawa H, et al. (2011) Pamphlet of the Project for Practical Applications of Service Robots, NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization) (in Japanese)

  15. National Police Agency (2012) Special Regulations for The Measure for Manned Mobility Robots’ Experiment on Public Roads (Chou-ki-Hatsu No.92) (in Japanese)

  16. Unsigned Editorial (2013) Nissan’s first public road test of autonomous drive. In: Phys. Org. Available via http://phys.org/news/2013-11-nissan-road-autonomous.html

  17. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2004) Toward 2025 human-robot co-existence society: the next generation robot vision seminar report. Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Tokyo (in Japanese)

  18. Kuo T, Wang Y (2014) New Generation of Robots: Taiwan is an A-list or a C-list? Business Weekly, no. 1381, (in Chinese) pp 138

  19. Unsigned Editorial (2014) ROBOCON Magazine, Robot “Tokku”: Towards the implementation of life-supporting robots (in Japanese) pp 18–27

  20. Corkill E (2009) Will Segway sci-fi ever be everyday fact? In: The Japan Times, Available via http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2009/11/15/general/will-segway-sci-fi-ever-be-everyday-fact

  21. Miyashita T (2012) Ubiquitous Network Robots for Life Support. Seminar Report: Active and Healthy Ageing: Research and Innovation Responses from Europe and Japan, Delegation of the European Union to Japan, Available via http://www.euinjapan.jp

  22. Edwards L (2009) Supermarket robot to help the elderly, In: Phys Org. Available via http://phys.org/news180261433.html

  23. Iwamura Y, Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets? In Proceedings of 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI’11

  24. Hagita N (2011) Legal problems and challenges on network robot systems in Japan. ICAR2011 Workshop on Urban Service Robotics: Challenges and Opportunities, June 20, 2011, Tallin

  25. Weng YH, Virk G, Yang S (2014) The safety for human-robot co-existing: on new ISO 13482 safety standard for service robots. Internet law review 17. Peking University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weng YH (2014) The study of safety governance for service robots: on open-texture risk. PhD Dissertation, Peking University Law School, Beijing (in Chinese)

  27. Zax D (2010) Want Your Garbage Picked Up? Theres a Robot for That. In: The Wall Street Journal, Available via http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/08/31/want-your-garbage-picked-up-theres-a-robot-for-that

  28. Salvini P, Teti G, Spadoni E, Frediani E, Boccalatte S, Nocco L, Mazzolai B, Laschi C, Comand G, Rossi E, Carrozza P, Dario P (2010) An investigation on legal regulations for robot deployment in urban areas: a focus on Italian law. Adv Robot 24(13):1901–1917 VSP-BRILL, Leiden

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferri G, Manzi A, Salvini P, Mozzolai B (2011) DustCart, an autonomous robot for door-to-door garbage collection: from DustBot Project to the experimentation in the small town of Peccioli. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai

  30. Unsigned Editorial (2012) Nevada lawmakers approve regulations for first in nation self-driving vehicles. In: NevadaNewsBureau. Available via at: http://www.nevadanewsbureau.com/2012/02/15/nevada-lawmakers-approve-regulations-for-first-in-nation-self-driving-vehicles

  31. Murray P (2012) Google’s self-driving car passes 300,000 miles. In: Forbes. Available via http://www.forbes.com/sites/singularity/2012/08/15/goog-les-self-driving-car-passes-300000-miles/

  32. Weng YH, Hillenbrand D (2014) The intelligentization of automobiles: smart-cars, robo-cars and their safety governance. J Sci Technol Law 110(4):632–646. Available via http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/magadetailprep/KJFL2014-04.htm

  33. Jones W (2014) University of Michigan to Open Robo Car Urban Test Track in the Fall. In: IEEE Spectrum. Available via http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/university-of-michigan-to-open-robo-car-test-track-in-the-fall

  34. Robot Policy Council (2006) Robot policy council report May 2006 version. Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and industry (in Japanese)

  35. Robot Policy Council (2007) Safety guidelines for next-generation robots. Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and industry (in Japanese)

  36. The Cabinet of Japan (2014) Draft outline of the robot revolution realization council. In: Japanese Prime Minister and his Cabinet. Available via http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/robot/ (in Japanese)

  37. Miyazaki H, Mukaidono M (2007) Basic concepts for safety design - ISO/IEC Guide 51 and ISO 12100. Japanese Safety Association, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  38. Priya Ganapati (2009) Robo-ethicists want to revamp Asimov’s 3 Laws. In: Wired.com. Available via http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/robo-ethics/

  39. Levy D (2007) Love + sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Salvini P, Charavella G, Yu W, Ferri G, Manzi A, Mozzolai B, Laschi C, Oh SR, Dario P (2010) How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot. In: Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Interaction (RO-MAN), Viareggio

  41. Catsoulis J (2015) ’Vice’, a Sci-Fi Thriller That Lacks Thrills. In: The New York Times. Available via http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/16/movies/vice-a-sci-fi-thriller-that-lacks-thrills.html

  42. Weng YH, Chen CH, Sun CT (2009) Toward the human-robot co-existence society: on safety intelligence for next generation robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(4):267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin P (2014) Here’s a terrible idea: robot cars with adjustable ethics settings. In: Wired.com. Available via http://www.wired.com/2014/08/heres-a-terrible-idea-robot-cars-with-adjustable-ethics-settings/

  44. Zyga L (2009) Living safely with robots, beyond Asimov’s Laws. In: Phys Org. Available via http://phys.org/news164887377.html

  45. Arkin RC (2008) Governing lethal behavior: embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, HRI’08

  46. Kant I (1780) Our duties to animals. Infield L (trans.). Lectures on ethics. Harper and Row, New York, p 239241

  47. Ishiguro I (2012) Humans, arts, and androids the reason why I create robots. Nippyo Press, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kang H, Hashimoto K, Kondo H, Hattori K, Nishikawa K, Hama Y, Lim H, Takanishi A, Suga K, Kato K (2010) Realization of biped walking on uneven terrain by new foot mechanism capable of detecting ground surface. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, Alaska, pp 5167–5172

  49. Hashimoto K, Sugahara Y, Tanaka C, Kawase M, Sunazuka H, Ohta A, Lim H, Takanishi A (2006) A Fall Avoidance Foot Mechanism for A Biped Locomotor. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Orlando, pp 1219–1224

  50. Fujiwara K, Kanehiro F, Kajita S, Yokoi K, Saito H, Harada K, Kaneko K, Hirukawa H (2003) The first human-size humanoid that can fall over safely and stand-up again. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, pp 1920–1916

  51. Kagami S, Nishiwaki K, Kuffner J, Thompson S, Chestnutt J, Stilman M, Michel P (2007) Humanoid HRP2-DHRC for autonomous and interactive behavior. In: Thmn S, Brooks R, Durrant-Whyte H (eds) Robotics research, STAR 28. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 103–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Sugahara Y, Ohta A, Hashimoto K, Sunazuka H, Kawase M, Tanaka C, Lim H, Takanishi A (2006) Towards the Biped Walking Wheelchair. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Pisa, pp 781–786

  53. Weng YH (2011) The open-texture risk in the human-robot co-existence society: a review on Ryan Calo’s “Open Robotics”. Internet Law Review 13. Peking University Press, Beijing, pp 88–99 (in Chinese)

  54. Asaro PM (2012) Robots as Products: Responsibility and Liability. In: Robotics Business Review (RBR). Available via http://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/article/

  55. Nishizawa T, Hattori H (2007) Anecdotal report of safety design for service robots-childcare robot PaPeRo. J Robot Soc Jpn 25(8):1159–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weng YH, Chen CH, Sun CT (2007) The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL), Stanford, pp 205–209

  57. Kelley R, Schaerer E, Gomez M, Nicolessu M (2010) Liability in robotics: an international perspective on robots as animals. Adv Robot 24(13):1861–1871 VSP-BRILL, Leiden

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Weng YH (2010) Beyond robot ethics: on a legislative consortium for social robotics. Adv Robot 24(13):1919–1926 VSP-BRILL, Leiden

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ms. Diane Chiang of the Art Center College of Design for her helpful suggestions; Mr. Shoji Seri of the Robotics Industry Development Council (RIDC) and officials of the Economy, Tourism and Culture Bureau, New Industry and Investment Promotion Department, Fukuoka City Hall for surveying their non-disclosed documents to the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yueh-Hsuan Weng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weng, YH., Sugahara, Y., Hashimoto, K. et al. Intersection of “Tokku” Special Zone, Robots, and the Law: A Case Study on Legal Impacts to Humanoid Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics 7, 841–857 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0287-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0287-x

Keywords

Navigation