Skip to main content
Log in

A Robot that Distributes Flyers to Pedestrians in a Shopping Mall

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports our research on developing a robot that distributes flyers to pedestrians. The difficulty is that since the potential receivers are pedestrians who are not necessarily cooperative, the robot needs to appropriately plan its motions, making it easy and non-obstructive for the potential receivers to accept the flyers. We analyzed peoples distributing behavior in a real shopping mall and found that successful distributors approach pedestrians from the front and only extend their arms near the target pedestrian. We also found that pedestrians tend to accept flyers if previous pedestrians took them. Based on these analyses, we developed a behavior model of the robots behavior, implemented it in a humanoid robot, and confirmed its effectiveness in a field experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi C, Shiomi M, Smith C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H (2013) A model of distributional handing interaction for a mobile robot. In: Robotics: science and systems conference (RSS2013)

  2. Gross H-M et al (2008) Shopbot: progress in developing an interactive mobile shopping assistant for everyday use. In: IEEE International conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC2008), pp 3471–3478

  3. Burgard W et al (1998) The interactive museum tour-guide robot. In: National conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI1998), pp 11–18

  4. Thrun S et al (1999) Minerva: a second-generation museum tour-guide robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA1999), pp 1999–2005

  5. Kuno Y et al (2007) Museum guide robot based on sociological interaction analysis. In: ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI2007), pp 1191–1194

  6. Ferri G et al (2011) Dustcart, an autonomous robot for door-to-door garbage collection: from Dustbot project to the experimentation in the small town of Peccioli. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA2011), pp 655–660

  7. Weiss A et al (2010) Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2010), pp 23–30

  8. Kirby R, Forlizzi J, Simmons R (2010) Affective social robots. Robot Auton Syst 58:322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mutlu B, Forlizzi J (2008) Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2008), pp 287–294

  10. Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, Roy N, Thrun S (2003) Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: challenges and results. Robot Auton Syst 42:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2011), pp 37–44

  12. Kanda T, Shiomi M, Miyashita Z, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2010) A communication robot in a shopping mall. IEEE Trans Robot 26:897–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemp CC, Edsinger A, Torres-Jara E (2007) Challenges for robot manipulation in human environments. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorokin A, Berenson D, Srinivasa SS, Hebert M (2010) People helping robots helping people: Crowdsourcing for grasping novel objects. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS2010), pp 2117–2122

  15. Ralph M, Moussa MA (2010) An integrated system for user-adaptive robotic grasping. IEEE Trans Robot 26(4):698–709

  16. Kajikawa S, Okino T, Ohba K, Inooka H (1995) Motion planning for hand-over between human and robot. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS1999), pp 193–199

  17. Shibata S, Tanaka K, Shimizu A (1995) Experimental analysis of handing over. In: IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN1995), pp 53–58

  18. Agah A, Tanie K (1997) Human interaction with a service robot: mobile-manipulator handing over an object to a human. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA1997), pp 575–580

  19. Huber M, Rickert M, Knoll A, Brandt T, Glasauer S (2008) Human–robot interaction in handing-over tasks. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN2008), pp 107–112

  20. Cakmak M, Srinivasa SS, Lee MK, Kiesler S, Forlizzi J (2011) Using spatial and temporal contrast for fluent robot–human hand-overs. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI 2011), pp 489–496

  21. Cakmak M, Srinivasa SS, Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2011) Human preferences for robot–human hand-over configurations. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS2011), pp 1986–1993

  22. Sisbot EA, Marin-Urias LF, Alami R, Simeon T (2007) A human aware mobile robot motion planner. IEEE Trans Robot 23:874–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sisbot EA, Clodic A, Alami R, Ransan M (2008) Supervision and motion planning for a mobile manipulator interacting with humans. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2008), pp 327–334

  24. Sisbot EA, Ros R, Alami R (2011) Situation assessment for human–robot interactive object manipulation. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN2011), pp 15–20

  25. Michalowski MP, Sabanovic S, Simmons R (2006) A spatial model of engagement for a social robot. In: 9th IEEE international workshop on advanced motion control, pp 762–767

  26. Bergstrom N, Kanda T, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) Modeling of natural human–robot encounters. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS2008), pp 2623–2629

  27. Dautenhahn K, et al. (2006) How may i serve you? A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2006), pp 172–179

  28. Zlotowski J, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2012) Navigating in public space: participants evaluation of a robots approach behavior. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2012), pp 283–284

  29. Satake S et al (2009) How to approach humans?: strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2009), pp 109–116

  30. Shi C, Shimada M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Spatial formation model for initiating conversation. In: Robotics: science and systems conference (RSS2011)

  31. Torta E, Cuijpers RH, Juola JF, Van Der Pol D (2012) Modeling and testing proxemic behavior for humanoid robots. Int J Humanoid Robot 9(4):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Z, Yang C, Su C-Y, Zhang W (2015) Vision-based model predictive control for steering of a nonholonomic mobile robot. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 24(2):553–564

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ye W, Li Z, Yang C, Sun J, Su C-Y, Lu R (2015) Vision-based human tracking control of a wheeled inverted pendulum robot. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(11):2423–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brscic D, Kanda T, Ikeda T, Miyashita T (2013) Person tracking in large public spaces using 3d range sensors. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 43:522–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brscic D, Kanda T (2015) Changes in usage of an indoor public space: analysis of one year of person tracking. IEEE Trans Human Mach Syst 45(2):228–237

  36. Kooijmans T, Kanda T, Bartneck C, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Accelerating robot development through integral analysis of human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23:1001–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Imai M, Ono T (2004) Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots. Proc IEEE 92:1839–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by JST CREST.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This work was supported by JST, CREST and was in part presented at a conference [1] at which we only reported our basic model. In this journal paper that is built upon our early work, we further analyzed peoples interactions, identified the importance of continuous handing, and fully implemented our system so that the robot continuously performed handing tasks. We also added a complete field study in a real shopping mall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, C., Satake, S., Kanda, T. et al. A Robot that Distributes Flyers to Pedestrians in a Shopping Mall. Int J of Soc Robotics 10, 421–437 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0442-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0442-7

Keywords

Navigation