Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Attachment Framework for Human-Robot Interaction

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attachment theory is a research area in psychology that has enjoyed decades of successful study, and has subsequently become explored in realms beyond that of the original infant-caregiver bonds. Now, attachment is studied in relation to pets, symbols (such as deities), objects, technologies, and notably for our purposes, robots. When we discuss attachment in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), is “attachment” to a robot the same as being attached to a pet? Or does it more closely resemble attachment to a technology device such as a smartphone? Through untangling the concept of attachment in HRI, we summarize a breadth of the existing attachment literature in a unified spectrum. We present a notion of weak attachment, and strong attachment before setting both as distinct ends of a spectrum of attachment. We motivate this spectrum by teasing out the underlying theoretical basis for strong attachment, and how capabilities of the attachment figure could lead to stronger or weaker attachment. This more nuanced, multi-dimensional representation of attachment allows us to present a clarified categorization of where various human-robot bonds explored in HRI studies fit on the spectrum, where robots in general could place, and how a clearer definition of human-robot attachment can benefit future HRI studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ainsworth Mary DS, Mary B, Sally W, et al (1978) Patterns of attachment, Everett Waters

  2. Ainsworth Mary S (1989) Attachments beyond infancy. Am Psychol 44(4):709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali S, Moroso T, Breazeal C (2019) Can children learn creativity from a social robot? In: Proceedings of the 2019 on creativity and cognition, pp 359–368

  4. Alves-Oliveira P, Arriaga P, Cronin Matthew A, Paiva A(2020) Creativity encounters between children and robots. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 379–388

  5. Alves-Oliveira P, Gomes S, Chandak A, Arriaga P, Hoffman G, Paiva A (2020) Software architecture for yolo, a creativity-stimulating robot. SoftwareX 11:100461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anon. In Review

  7. Arnold T, Scheutz M (2018) Hri ethics and type-token ambiguity: what kind of robotic identity is most responsible? Ethics Inf Technol, pp 1–10

  8. Bachelard G (2014) The poetics of space. Penguin Classics

  9. Barrett LF (2017) How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  10. Belpaeme T, Kennedy J, Ramachandran A, Scassellati B, Tanaka F (2018) Social robots for education: A Review. Sci Robot 3(21)

  11. Bhattacharjee T, Gordon EK, Scalise R, Cabrera ME, Caspi A, Cakmak M, Srinivasa SS (2020) Is more autonomy always better? exploring preferences of users with mobility impairments in robot-assisted feeding. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 181–190

  12. Bock N, Hoffmann L, Rosenthal-vd PA (2018) Your touch leaves me cold, robot. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 71–72. ACM

  13. Bowlby J (1960) Separation anxiety. Int J Psycho-Anal 41:89–113

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowlby J (1982) Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry 52(4):664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Breazeal C (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(1–2):119–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretherton I (1985) Attachment theory: retrospect and prospect. Monographs of the society for research in child development, pp 3–35

  17. Bretherton I (1992) The origins of attachment theory: John bowlby and mary ainsworth. Dev Psychol 28(5):759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooks HL, Rushton K, Lovell K, Bee P, Walker L, Grant L, Rogers A (2018) The power of support from companion animals for people living with mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence. BMC Psychiatr 18(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CaÑAmero L, Blanchard AJ, Nadel J (2006) Attachment bonds for human-like robots. Int J Humanoid Rob 3(03):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michael C (2015) Mobile phones and the good life: Examining the relationships among mobile use, social capital and subjective well-being. New Media Soc 17(1):96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Che X, Cash R, Ng SK, Fitzgerald P, Fitzgibbon BM (2018) A systematic review of the processes underlying the main and the buffering effect of social support on the experience of pain. Clinical J Pain 34(11):1061–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen H, Park HW, Breazeal C (2020) Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Comput Edu 150:103836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen L, Zhou M, Su W, Wu M, She J, Hirota K (2018) Softmax regression based deep sparse autoencoder network for facial emotion recognition in human-robot interaction. Inf Sci 428:49–61

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Chita-Tegmark M, Scheutz M (2020) Assistive robots for the social management of health: A framework for robot design and human–robot interaction research. Int J Soc Robot, pp 1–21

  25. Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins EC, Millings A, Prescott TJ (2013) Attachment to assistive technology: A new conceptualisation. In: Proceedings of the 12th European AAATE conference (Association for the advancement of assistive technology in Europe), vol 6, page 74

  27. Cruz C, Enrique SL, Morales EF (2008) Real-time face recognition for human-robot interaction. In: 2008 8th IEEE international conference on automatic face & gesture recognition, pp 1–6. IEEE

  28. Cruz-Sandoval D, Morales-Tellez A, Sandoval EB, Favela J (2020) A social robot as therapy facilitator in interventions to deal with dementia-related behavioral symptoms. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 161–169

  29. Davison DP, Wijnen FM, Charisi V, van der Meij J, Evers V, Reidsma D (2020) Working with a social robot in school: a long-term real-world unsupervised deployment. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 63–72

  30. de Graaf Maartje MA, Allouch SB, van Dijk JAGM (2018) A phased framework for long-term user acceptance of interactive technology in domestic environments. New Media Soc 20(7):2582–2603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. DiSalvo CF, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2002) All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp 321–326

  32. Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Erceau D, Guéguen N (2007) Tactile contact and evaluation of the toucher. J Soc Psychol 147(4):441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Feingold PR, Levy TS (2020) Social robot for rehabilitation: Expert clinicians and post-stroke patients’ evaluation following a long-term intervention. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 151–160

  35. Fitter NT, Rush L, Cha E, Groechel T, Matarić MJ, Takayama L (2020) Closeness is key over long distances: Effects of interpersonal closeness on telepresence experience. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 499–507

  36. Forlizzi J, Carl D (2006) Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, pp 258–265

  37. Gallenberger D, Bhattacharjee T, Kim Y, Srinivasa SS (2019) Transfer depends on acquisition: Analyzing manipulation strategies for robotic feeding. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 267–276. IEEE

  38. Garreau J (2007) Bots on the ground. Washington Post 6

  39. Fatma G, Önder T (2019) Design and implementation of a facial character analysis algorithm for humanoid robots. Robotica 37(11):1850–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gordon G (2015) Cynthia Breazeal, and Susan Engel. Can children catch curiosity from a social robot? In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 91–98

  41. Gordon G, Spaulding S, Westlund JK, Lee JJ, Plummer L, Martinez M, Das M, Breazeal C (2016) Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children’s second language skills. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 30

  42. Pehr G, Mario M, Shaver Phillip R (2010) Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 14(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gross H-M, Mueller S, Schroeter C, Volkhardt M, Scheidig A, Debes K, Richter K, Doering N (2015) Robot companion for domestic health assistance: Implementation, test and case study under everyday conditions in private apartments. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 5992–5999. IEEE

  44. Hazan C, Zeifman D (1994) Sex and the psychological tether. w: K. bartholomew, d. perlman (red.), attachment processes in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships (s. 151-178)

  45. Hazan C, Zeifman D (1999) Pair bonds as attachments: Evaluating the evidence, handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications

  46. Hazan C, Shaver P (1987) Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(3):511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Helliwell JF, Putnam RD (2004) The social context of well-being. Philos Trans Royal Soc London Ser B: Biol Sci 359(1449):1435–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Herath DC, Kroos C, Stevens C, Burnham D (2013) Adopt-a-robot: a story of attachment (or the lack thereof). In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 135–136. IEEE

  49. Hiolle A, Canamero L, Davila-Ross M, Bard KA (2012) Eliciting caregiving behavior in dyadic human-robot attachment-like interactions. ACM Trans Inter Intell Syst (TiiS) 2(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang L, Varnado T, Gillan D (2013) An exploration of robot builders’ attachment to their lego robots. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 57, pp 1825–1829. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA

  51. Huber A, Weiss A, Rauhala M (2016) The ethical risk of attachment how to identify, investigate and predict potential ethical risks in the development of social companion robots. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 367–374. IEEE

  52. Ivanov SH, Webster C, Berezina K (2017) Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies. Revista Turismo Desenvolvimento 27(28):1501–1517

    Google Scholar 

  53. Janevic MR, Varick S, Connell CM, Piette JD, Jenna G, Julie F (2020) The role of pets in supporting cognitive-behavioral chronic pain self-management: Perspectives of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 39(10):1088–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Julius H, Beetz A, Kotrschal K, Turner D, Uvnäs-Moberg K (2012) Attachment to pets: An integrative view of human-animal relationships with implications for therapeutic practice. Hogrefe Publishing, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kahn PH, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Gill BT, Shen S, Ruckert JH, Gary HE (2016) Human creativity can be facilitated through interacting with a social robot. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 173–180. IEEE

  56. Kahn PH Jr, Hiroshi I, Freier NG, Severson RL, Gill BT, Ruckert JH, Solace S (2012) “robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Dev Psychol 48(2):303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Keefer LA, Landau MJ, Rothschild ZK, Daniel S (2012) Attachment to objects as compensation for close others’ perceived unreliability. J Exp Soc Psychol 48(4):912–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Keefer LA, Landau MJ, Daniel S (2014) Non-human support: Broadening the scope of attachment theory. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 8(9):524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Keefer LA (2014) The use of material objects as a secure base. PhD thesis, University of Kansas

  60. Kidd CD, Taggart W, Turkle S (2006) A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006. ICRA 2006., pp 3972–3976. IEEE

  61. Kirkpatrick LA (1992) An attachment-theory approach psychology of religion. Int J Psychol Religion 2(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Konok V, Korcsok B, Miklósi A, Gácsi M (2018) Should we love robots?-the most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Comput Hum Behav 80:132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kwan VSY, Gosling SD, John OP (2008) Anthropomorphism as a special case of social perception: A cross-species social relations model analysis of humans and dogs. Soc Cogn 26(2):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kwon M, Biyik E, Talati A, Bhasin K, Losey DP, Sadigh D (2020) When humans aren’t optimal: Robots that collaborate with risk-aware humans. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 43–52

  65. Lee KM, Park N, Song H (2005) Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? effects of a robot’s long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people’s social responses toward it. Human Commun Res 31(4):538–563

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S, Rybski P, Antanitis J, Savetsila S (2012) Personalization in hri: A longitudinal field experiment. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 319–326. IEEE

  67. Leyzberg D, Ramachandran A, Scassellati B (2018) The effect of personalization in longer-term robot tutoring. ACM Trans Human-Robot Inter (THRI) 7(3):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Logan DE, Cynthia B, Goodwin MS, Sooyeon J, Brianna OC, Duncan S-F, James H, Peter W (2019) Social robots for hospitalized children. Pediatrics 144(1):e20181511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Maalouf N, Sidaoui A, Elhajj IH, Asmar D (2018) Robotics in nursing: a scoping review. J Nurs Scholarsh 50(6):590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Mackenzie C, Rogers W (2014) and Susan Dodds. New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford University Press, Vulnerability

  71. McGlynn SA, Geiskkovitch D, Mitzner TL, Rogers WA (2016) Paro’s stress-reduction potential for older adults. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 60, pp 1799–1803. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA

  72. Melson GF, Kahn PH Jr, Batya F (2009) Robotic pets in human lives: Implications for the human-animal bond and for human relationships with personified technologies. J Soc Iss 65(3):545–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Moharana S, Panduro AE, Lee HR, Riek LD (2019) Robots for joy, robots for sorrow: community based robot design for dementia caregivers. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 458–467. IEEE

  74. Nakagawa K, Shiomi M, Shinozawa K, Matsumura R, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Effect of robot’s active touch on people’s motivation. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp 465–472. ACM

  75. Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books

  76. Paetzel M, Perugia G, Castellano G (2020) The persistence of first impressions: The effect of repeated interactions on the perception of a social robot. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 73–82

  77. Parenteau SC, Hurd KW, Haibo FC (2019) Attachment to god and psychological adjustment: God’s responses and our coping strategies. J Relig Health 58(4):1286–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Park E, Lee J (2014) I am a warm robot: the effects of temperature in physical human-robot interaction. Robotica 32(1):133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Park HW, Rosenberg-Kima R, Rosenberg M, Gordon G, Breazeal C (2017) Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 137–145

  80. Ramachandran A, Huang C-M, Gartland E, Scassellati B (2018) Thinking aloud with a tutoring robot to enhance learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 59–68

  81. Ritschel H, Aslan I, Mertes S, Seiderer A, André E (2019) Personalized synthesis of intentional and emotional non-verbal sounds for social robots. In: 2019 8th international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), pp 1–7. IEEE

  82. Russo A, D’Onofrio G, Gangemi A, Giuliani F, Mongiovi M, Ricciardi F, Greco F, Cavallo F, Dario P, Sancarlo D et al (2019) Dialogue systems and conversational agents for patients with dementia: The human-robot interaction. Rejuve Res 22(2):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Sharkey N, Sharkey A (2010) The crying shame of robot nannies: an ethical appraisal. Inter Stud 11(2):161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Shibata T, Wada K (2011) Robot therapy: a new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly-a mini-review. Gerontology 57(4):378–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Shiomi M, Nakagawa K, Shinozawa K, Matsumura R, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2017) Does a robot’s touch encourage human effort? Int J Social Robot 9(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Shiomi M, Nakata A, Kanbara M, Hagita N (2017) A hug from a robot encourages prosocial behavior. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 418–423. IEEE

  88. Sung J-Y, Guo L, Grinter RE, Christensen HI (2007) “my roomba is rambo”: intimate home appliances. In: International conference on ubiquitous computing, pp 145–162. Springer

  89. Taskiran M, Kahraman N, Erdem CE (2020) Face recognition: Past, present and future (a review). Digital Signal Processing, page 102809

  90. Tung VWS, Au N (2018) Exploring customer experiences with robotics in hospitality. Int J Contemp Hospital Manag

  91. Turkle S (2006) A nascent robotics culture: New complicities for companionship. In: American association for artificial intelligence technical report series AAAI

  92. Utami D, Bickmore T (2019) Collaborative user responses in multiparty interaction with a couples counselor robot. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 294–303. IEEE

  93. von Mohr M, Kirsch LP, Fotopoulou A (2017) The soothing function of touch: affective touch reduces feelings of social exclusion. Sci Rep 7(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  94. Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Living with seal robots-its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Trans Rob 23(5):972–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Weiss A, Wurhofer D, Tscheligi M (2009) “i love this dog”-children’s emotional attachment to the robotic dog aibo. Int J Social Robot 1(3):243–248

  96. Willemse CJAM, van Erp JBF (2019) Social touch in human-robot interaction: Robot-initiated touches can induce positive responses without extensive prior bonding. Int J Social Robot 11(2):285–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Winnicott W (1953) D. Transitional objects and transitional phenomena-a study of the first not-me possession. Int J Psycho-Anal 34:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wood L, Christian H (2011) Dog walking as a catalyst for strengthening the social fabric of the community. The Health Benefits of Dog Walking for Pets and People, pp 51–74

  99. Zilcha-Mano S, Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2011) An attachment perspective on human-pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. J Res Pers 45(4):345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HRI Lab, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA

    Nicholas Rabb, Theresa Law, Meia Chita-Tegmark & Matthias Scheutz

Authors
  1. Nicholas Rabb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theresa Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meia Chita-Tegmark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthias Scheutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Rabb.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabb, N., Law, T., Chita-Tegmark, M. et al. An Attachment Framework for Human-Robot Interaction. Int J of Soc Robotics 14, 539–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00802-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00802-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation