Abstract
While there is a growing body of literature on transit safety, most studies on this topic tend to focus on a single type of transit system or on a single city. There is a need for a better understanding of safety issues across different transit modes and in different geographies in order to help inform city or transit agencies choosing between different transit system design options on the safety implications of their choices. We address this gap by reviewing the existing literature on transit safety for different bus and rail surface transit systems. We found that the main safety issues and common crash types depend more on the geometry of intersections and the corridor layout than on the type of technology used for transit vehicles (i.e. bus or rail) and that these issues are similar across different regions of the world. Furthermore, we found that there is a good understanding of the problems faced by transit systems, and a wide range of suggested countermeasures, but little evidence on the effectiveness of the different countermeasures in reducing target crashes. By taking an approach that cuts across different transit modes, we are also able to suggest solutions from one type of system that could be applicable to another. For example, we point out that Bus Rapid Transit agencies could learn from light rail operations about best practices in managing conflict points between transit vehicles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While we use these definitions when referring to Busway or BRT in this paper, we acknowledge that delineation between these two categories is not always clear and some studies use the terms interchangeably.
Source: Metrobus, Ciudad de Mexico, Fichas tecnicas, retrieved from http://www.metrobus.df.gob.mx/fichas.html#uno and excluding Metrobus Line 4, which does not have a median alignment.
Brazil uses the standard international definition of a traffic fatality (i.e. a death that occurs within 30 days of a crash and as a result of that crash) while in Mexico, only fatalities at the scene of the crash are reported. While WHO provides adjustment factors for the 30-day definition, these are calibrated at the country level, making their use at the city level subject to high uncertainty. Moreover, the WHO also points out that there is an under-reporting of traffic fatalities in Latin American countries, regardless of the definition used. There are studies that quantify the level of under-reporting, but again these are national level, not city level studies, making their application to city level analysis subject to uncertainty (Jacobs et al. 2000).
References
Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ (2004) Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol 34(1):215–220
Bocarejo JP, Velasquez JM, Diaz CA, Tafur LE (2012) Impact of BRT systems on road safety: lessons from Bogota. Transp Res Rec 2317:1–7
Cervero R (2006) Alternative approaches to modeling the travel-demand impacts of smart growth. J Am Plan Assoc 72:3
Chalanton I, Jadoul M (2009) Etude des accidents entre un tram et un piéton en région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Institut Belge pour la Sécurité Routière, Bruxelles
Diogenes MC, Lindau LA (2009) Evaluating pedestrian safety at midblock crossings in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transp Res Rec 2193:37–43
Duduta N, Adriazola C, Hidalgo D, Lindau LA, Jaffe R (2012) Understanding the road safety impact of high performance BRT and busway design features. Transp Res Rec 2317:8–16
Duduta N, Lindau LA, Adriazola-Steil C (2013) Using empirical Bayes to estimate the safety impacts of transit improvements in Latin America. In: Paper presented at the Road Safety and Simulation Conference, Rome
Dumbaugh E, Rae R (2009) Safe urban form: revisiting the relationship between community design and traffic safety. J Am Plan Assoc 75(3):309–329
EMBARQ (2012) Road safety inspection report of the TransOeste BRT corridor in Rio de Janeiro. EMBARQ Report, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Goh KCK, Currie G, Sarvi M, Logan D (2013) Investigating the road safety impacts of bus rapid transit priority measures. In: Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington DC
Hauer E, Harwood D, Council FM, Griffith MS (2001) Estimating safety by the empirical Bayes method: a tutorial. In: Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting, Washington DC
Jacobs G, Aeron-Thomas A, Astrop A (2000) Estimating global road fatalities. TRL Report 445. Crowthorne, Berkshire, Transport Research Laboratory
Klaver Pecheux K, Saporta H (2009) Light rail vehicle collisions with vehicles at signalized intersections. A synthesis of transit practice. TCRP synthesis 79. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 2009
Korve HW, et al (2001) Light rail service: pedestrian and vehicular safety. TCRP Report 69. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC
Ladrón de Guevara F, Washington SP, Oh J (2004) Forecasting crashes at the planning level. Simultaneous negative binomial crash model applied in Tucson, Arizona. Transportation Research Record, No. 1987, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, pp 191–199
Small K, Verhoef E (2007) The economics of urban transportation, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
Viola R, Roe M, Shin H (2010). The New York City Pedestrian Safety Study and Action Plan. New York City Department of Transportation
Vuchic V (2007) Urban transit systems and technology. Wiley, Hoboken
World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) Global status report on road safety. WHO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duduta, N., Adriazola, C., Hidalgo, D. et al. Traffic safety in surface public transport systems: a synthesis of research. Public Transp 7, 121–137 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0087-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0087-y