Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the factors affecting transit user loyalty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public transit agencies are constantly looking for ways to increase their ridership. While many studies have attempted to identify the factors affecting new customer attraction, the issue of transit user loyalty has been far less researched. In addition to being a good indicator of a transit agency’s performance, customer loyalty provides several added benefits. Loyal customers are more likely to use the transit agency’s services and recommend them to potential new users. Furthermore, attracting users usually involves additional customer acquisition costs (e.g. marketing) not required in order to retain existing loyal users. This study used data provided by a mixed Stated Preference/Revealed Preference survey to identify some of the factors that affect customer loyalty in the context of public transit. Factors examined include service attributes, trip characteristics, as well as socioeconomic and psychological attributes of the individual. The findings suggest that service quality attributes play a critical role in transit user loyalty, while initiatives such as the provision of real-time information panels or making park and ride facilities available have a less determinant effect on the customers’ mode shifting decisions, irrespective of their emotional response to public transit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bansal HS, Irving PG, Taylor SF (2004) A three-component model of customer to service providers. J Acad Mark Sci 32:234–250. doi:10.1177/0092070304263332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass P, Donoso P, Munizaga M (2011) A model to assess public transport demand stability. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 45:755–764. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Morikawa T (1990) Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 24:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen JT, Chen S-L (2001) The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 13:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillo V, Ortúzar JDD (2006) Implications of thresholds in discrete choice modelling. Transp Rev 26:667–691. doi:10.1080/01441640500487275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillo V, Ortúzar JDD, Williams HCWL (2007) Modeling discrete choices in the presence of inertia and serial correlation. Transp Sci 41:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchi E, Manca F (2011) Accounting for inertia in modal choices: some new evidence using a RP/SP dataset. Transportation 38:679–695. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9338-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Oña J, de Oña R, Calvo FJ (2012) A classification tree approach to identify key factors of transit service quality. Expert Syst Appl 39:11164–11171. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2012a) Structural equation modelling for analysing passengers’ perceptions about railway services. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 54:96–106. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2012b) Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality. Eur Transp 51:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Figler Sa, Iraj PS, Welch EW, Yavuz N (2011) Customer loyalty and Chicago, Illinois, transit authority buses. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2216:148–156. doi:10.3141/2216-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote P, Stuart D, Elmore-Yalch R (2001) Exploring customer loyalty as a transit performance measure. Transp Res Rec 1753:93–101. doi:10.3141/1753-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton G (2005) How commitment both enables and undermines marketing relationships. Eur J Mark 39:1372–1388. doi:10.1108/03090560510623307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA

  • Habib KMN, Kattan L, Islam MT (2011) Model of personal attitudes towards transit service quality. J Adv Transp 45:271–285. doi:10.1002/atr.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirobata Y, Kawakami S (1990) Modeling disaggregate behavioral modal switching models based on intention data. Transp Res Part B Methodol 24B:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idris AO (2013) Modal shift forecasting models for transit service planning. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Idris AO, Nurul Habib KM, Shalaby A (2012) Modal shift forecasting model for transit service planning: survey instrument design. In: The 12th International Conference on Advanced Systems for Public Transport (CASPT), July 23rd–27th, 2012, The Ritz-Carlton Santiago, Chile

  • Idris AO, Habib KMN, Shalaby A (2014) Dissecting the role of transit service attributes in attracting commuters: lessons from a comprehensive RP-SP study on commuting mode switching behaviour in toronto. In: Paper accepted for presentation at the 93rd TRB Annual Meeting, January 12th–16th, 2014

  • Irfan SM, Kee DMH, Shahbaz S (2012) Service quality and rail transport in Pakistan: a passenger perspective. World Appl Sci J 18:361–369. doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.03.3044

    Google Scholar 

  • Joewono TB, Kubota H (2007) User perceptions of private paratransit operation in Indonesia. J Public Transp 10:99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TO, Sasser WE (1995) Why satisfied customers defect. Harv Bus Rev 15:88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Ulfarsson GF (2012) Commitment to light rail transit patronage: case study for St. Louis MetroLink. J Urban Plan Dev 138:227–234. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai W-T, Chen C-F (2011) Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers—the roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transp Policy 18:318–325. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minser J, Webb V (2010) Quantifying the benefits. Application of customer loyalty modeling in public transportation context. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2144:111–120. doi:10.3141/2144-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa T (1989) Incorporating stated preference data In: Travel demand analysis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Odin Y, Odin N, Valette-Florence P (2001) Conceptual and operational aspects of brand loyalty: an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 53:75–84. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00076-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perk V, Flynn J, Volinski J (2008) Transit ridership, reliability, and retention (NCTR-776-07). National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida, Tampa

  • Pirc M (2008) Determinants, contexts, and measurements of customer loyalty. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Thakuriah P (2011) Will psychological effects of real-time transit information systems lead to ridership gain? Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2216:67–74. doi:10.3141/2216-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transit Cooperative Research Program (2003) Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (TCRP Report 100), 2nd ed. Washington, DC

  • Transportation Research Board (1999) TCRP Report 47 A Handbook for Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality. 40

  • Trépanier M, Habib KMN, Morency C (2012) Are transit users loyal? Revelations from a hazard model based on smart card data. Can J Civ Eng 39:610–618. doi:10.1139/L2012-048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrinopoulos Y, Aifadopoulou G (2008) A complete methodology for the quality control of passenger services in the public transport business. Eur Transp 37:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuchic VR (2005) Urban transit: operations planning and economics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb V (2010) Customer loyalty in the public transportation context. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen C-H, Lan L, Cheng H-L (2005) Structural equation modeling to determine passenger loyalty toward intercity bus services. Transp Res Rec 1927:249–255. doi:10.3141/1927-28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L-W (2011) Satisfaction, inertia, and customer loyalty in the varying levels of the zone of tolerance and alternative attractiveness. J Serv Mark 25:310–322. doi:10.1108/08876041111149676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Mark 60:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zins AH (2001) Relative attitudes and commitment in customer loyalty models. Some experiences in the commercial airline industry. Int J Serv Ind Manag 12:269–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khandker M. Nurul Habib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imaz, A., Nurul Habib, K.M., Shalaby, A. et al. Investigating the factors affecting transit user loyalty. Public Transp 7, 39–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0088-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0088-x

Keywords

Navigation