Abstract
Increasing the use of public transport is one of the most convenient strategies for alleviating the problems resulting from the excessive use of the private car in most metropolitan areas (congestion, pollution, noise, etc.). In order to improve public transport, developing appropriate tools for measuring and monitoring service quality is necessary. Among the various methods for measuring transit service quality the authors choose to adopt a method based on customer perspective because they retain that customers have the right elements for appropriately judging the used service. Specifically, a structural equation model is formulated to explore the impact of the relationship between global customer satisfaction and service quality attributes, such as safety, cleanliness, main and additional services, information about the service, and personnel, and to verify which of these attributes are key factors of service quality. Services offered by rail operators in Northern Italy are analysed (32 regional lines, 9 suburban lines, 2 express lines). Data collected by a survey addressed to a sample of more than 16,000 passengers are used for calibrating the model. The proposed model can be useful both to transport agencies and planners to analyze the correlation between service quality attributes and identify the most convenient attributes for improving the supplied service. The main findings are that information, cleanliness, and service characteristics like punctuality and frequency of runs have the highest positive effect on service quality. In addition, the authors experimented with the introduction of indicators explaining the endogenous latent variable different from the traditionally used indicators, such as an index based on both satisfaction and importance rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbuckle JL, Wothke W (1995) AMOS 4.0 User’s Guide. SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago
Bagozzi RP (1994) Structural equations models in marketing: basic principles. In: Bagozzi RP (ed) Principles of marketing research. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 317–385
Bamberg S, Schmidt P (1998) Changing travel-mode choice as rational choice: results from a longitudinal intervention study. Ration Soc 10:223–252
Bass P, Donoso P, Munizaga M (2011) A model to assess public transport demand stability. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 45:755–764
Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York
Cavana RY, Corbett LM, Lo YL (2007) Developing zones of tolerance for managing passenger rail service quality. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 24:7–31
Cirillo C, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2011) On the asymmetric user perception of transit service quality. Int J Sustain Transport 5:216–232
de Abreu e Silva J, Goulias KG (2009) A structural equations model of land use patterns, location choice, and travel behavior in Seattle and comparison with Lisbon. In: Proceedings of the 88th annual transportation research board meeting. January 2009: pp 11–15, Washington, DC
de Abreu e Silva J, Morency C, Goulias KG (2012) Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal. Transport Res Part A 46:1252–1264
de Ona J, de Ona R, Calvo FJ (2012) A classification tree approach to identify key factors of transit service quality. Expert Syst Appl 39:11164–11171
de Ona J, de Ona R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2013) Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transport Pol 29:219–226
dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecín P (2010) Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transport Pol 17:388–397
dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecín P (2011) The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Pol 18:217–227
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of Public Transportation 10:21–34
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2008a) A stated preference experiment for measuring service quality in public transport. Transport Plan Techn 31:509–523
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2008b) Willingness-to-pay of public transport users for improvement in service quality. European Transport 38:107–118
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2009) A new customer satisfaction index for evaluating transit service quality. Journal of Public Transportation 12:21–37
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2010) How to capture the passengers’ point of view on a transit service through rating and choice options. Transport Rev 30:435–450
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2011) A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Pol 18:172–181
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2012) Structural equation modelling for analysing passengers’ perceptions about railway services. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 54:96–106
Eboli L, Forciniti C, Mazzulla G (2012) Exploring land use and transport interaction through structural equation modelling. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 54:107–116
Fillone AM, Montalbo CM, Tiglao NC (2005) Assessing urban travel: a structural equations modeling (SEM) approach. Proc East Asia Soc Transp Stud 5:1050–1064
Golob TF (2003) Structural equation modeling. In: Goulias KG (ed) Transportation systems planning. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–23
Hensher DA, Prioni P (2002) A service quality index for area-wide contract performance assessment. J Transp Econ Policy 36:9–113
Hensher DA, Stopher P, Bullock P (2003) Service quality-developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transport Res A 37:499–517
Hill N, Brierley G, MacDougall R (2003) How to measure customer satisfaction. Gower Publishing, Hampshire
Imaz A, Habib KMN, Shalaby A, Idris A (2014) Investigating the factors affecting transit users’ loyalty. Public Transport. doi:10.1007/s12469-014-0088-x
Irfan Syed M, Mui Hung Kee D, Saman S (2011) Service quality in rail transport of Pakistan: A Passenger Perspective. In: Proceedings of 3rd SAICON: International Conference on Management, Business Ethics and Economics (ICMBEE) December 28–29, 2011. Lahore, Pakistan
Jen W, Tu R, Lu T (2011) Managing passenger behavioral intention: an integrated framework for service quality, satisfaction, perceived value, and switching barriers. Transport 38:321–342
Joewono TB, Kubota H (2007) User perception of private paratransit operation in Indonesia. J Public Transp 10:99–118
Joreskog KG (1973) Analysis of covariance structures. Multivariate Analysis-III ed. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed). Academic Press, New York, p 263–285
Lai W-T, Chen C-F (2011) Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers—the roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transp Policy 18:318–325
Ngatia GJ, Okamura T, Nakamura F (2010) The structure of users’ satisfaction on urban public transport service in a developing country: the case of Nairobi. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 8:1288–1300
Nurul-Habib KM, Kattan L, Islaam T (2011) Model of personal attitudes towards transit service quality. J Adv Transport 45:271–285
Pakdil F, Aydin Ö (2007) Expectations and perceptions in airline services: an analysis using weighted SERVQUAL scores. J Air Transport Manag 13:229–237
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64:12–40
Tam ML, Tam ML, Lam WHK (2005) Analysis of airport access mode choice: a case study in Hong Kong. J East Asia Soc Transport Stud 6:708–723
TRB (Transportation Research Board) (1999) A handbook for measuring customer satisfaction and service quality. Transit Cooperative Research Program, Report 47, National Academy Press. Washington, DC
TRB (Transportation Research Board) (2004). Transit capacity and quality of service manual, second edn. Transit cooperative research program, Report 100, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Trépanier M, Habib KMN, Morency C (2012) Are transit users loyal? Revelations from a hazard model based on smart card data. Can J Civ Eng 39:610–618
Tschopp M, Axhausen KW (2007) Transport infrastructure and spatial development in Switzerland between 1950 and 2000. In: Proceedings of 86th annual meeting of the transportation research board, January 2007. Washington, DC
Van Acker V, Witlox F, Van Wee B (2007) The effects of the land use system on travel behavior: a structural equation modeling approach. Transport Plan Techn 30:331–353
Washington SP, Karlaftis MG, Mannering FL (2003) Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Florida
Webb V (2010) Customer loyalty in the public transportation context. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Weinstein A (2000) Customer satisfaction among transit riders. How customer rank the relative importance of various service attributes. Transp Res Rec 1735:123–132
Wen C-H, Lan L, Cheng H-L (2005) Structural equation modeling to determine passenger loyalty toward intercity bus services. Transp Res Rec 1927:249–255
Wiley DE (1973) The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables. In: Goldberger AS, Ducan OD (eds) Structural equation models in the social science. Seminar Press, New York, pp 69–83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G. Relationships between rail passengers’ satisfaction and service quality: a framework for identifying key service factors. Public Transp 7, 185–201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0096-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0096-x