Abstract
Knowing the standard cost of public transit services is essential both for contracting authorities to banish and competently perform public tender and for states or regions to allocate resources for public transport between local authorities according to the actual local needs. Unfortunately, contracting authorities do not have access to robust cost estimates that take into account the characteristics of the service and the context in which it is produced, and that are, at the same time, detached from the specific characteristics of the company. Instead, most authorities use the historic cost, which is heavily influenced by the conditions of the specific market in which the companies operate, or the cost derived by the available budget of the authority. Both values can obviously differ greatly from the standard cost. This work proposes a methodology for building a synthetic model to assess a reference cost for local road transit services. This methodology is based on statistical analysis that correlates the features and the costs from contracted services in conditions that presuppose a highly efficient business. The developed model distinguishes between the characteristics of the service that are related to the operating program and the business efficiency parameters, which are not typically known outside of the company and are not the same for all companies. The proposed methodology is generally applicable, easy to use, and ensures reliable results if supported by a sufficiently large database. The model developed for suburban and intercity public road transit, although it was calibrated using a restricted database, represents the reality quite closely, as evidenced by the results of the statistical tests performed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Today, 1 Euro ≈ 1,2 CHF.
Daily driving hours are only a part of the expected service hours. In fact, a portion of this time is spent for drivers waiting at terminuses to make the next ride, usually a return trip. These “downtimes” are necessary to carry out the service as scheduled, and they are fundamentally higher for intercity rides.
The different types of analyzed road transport (urban, suburban or rural) were considered separately in their operating characteristics and cost without any consolidation.
Both the costs and the fees considered are the net of value added tax (VAT).
In the sample, we considered the following areas: Aosta Valley (subdivided into three singularly entrusted sub-areas: Low Valley, Center Valley, and High Valley), the province of Cuneo, the metropolitan area of Turin, the Molise region, the metropolitan area of Bologna, and the province of Perugia subdivided into two sub-areas.
References
Abrate G, Erbetta F, Fraquelli G, Vannoni D (2014) Cost function estimation of multi-service firms. Evidence from the passenger transport industry. Carlo Alberto Notebooks, n. 380, http://www.carloalberto.org/assets/working-papers/no.380.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2016
ANAV, La Sapienza University (2013) La determinazione del costo standard nei servizi di trasporto pubblico locale su autobus: aspetti metodologici e prime esperienze applicative. Residenza di Ripetta, Roma, http://www.ferpress.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Studio-su-Costo-Standard2.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2015
ASSTRA (2013) Un modello di calcolo del costo standard per il trasporto pubblico locale e regionale automobilistico. Audizione presso la IX Commissione trasporti, poste e telecomunicazioni della Camera dei Deputati, Roma, http://www.sindacatofast.it/sites/default/files/doc_pdf_inf/audizione%20commissione%20trasporti.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2015
Avenali A, Boitani A, Catalano G, D’Alfonso T, Matteucci G (2014) Un modello per la determinazione del costo standard nei servizi di trasporto pubblico locale su autobus in Italia. Econ Polit Ind 4:181–213
Cambini C, Filippini M (2003) Competitive tendering and optimal size in the regional bus transportation industry: an example from Italy. Ann Public Cooperative Econ 74(1):163–182
Cubukcu KM (2006) Cost of urban bus transit operations and geography of service territory. conference of regional and urban modeling, free University of Brussels, http://ecomod.net/sites/default/files/document-conference/ecomod2006-rum/1149.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016
Dalen D M, Gomez Lobo A (2002) Regulatory contracts and cost efficiency in the Norwegian Bus Industry: do high-powered contracts really work. 7th Annual Conference of the Latin American and Carribean Economic Association, Discussion Paper 6, http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/94048/1/Dalen1dp2002-06.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
Demsetz H (1968) Why regulate utilities? J Law Econ 11:55–65
Fabbri D (1998) La stima di frontiere di costo nel Trasporto Pubblico Locale: una rassegna e un’applicazione. Econ Pubblica 3:55–94
Fazioli R, Filippini M, Prioni P (1993) Cost structure and efficiency of local public transport: the case of Emilia Romagna bus companies. Int J Transp Econ 3:305–324
Fazioli R, Filippini M, Kunzle M (2003) Valutazione dell’efficienza delle compagnie di bus italiane e svizzere. Inside L’efficienza nei servizi pubblici. Banca d’Italia, Roma, pp 175–214
Filippini M, Maggi R, Prioni P (2001) Cost-based yardstick regulation in the Swiss regional public bus industry. Conference paper, 1st Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verità/Ascona, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228603705_Cost_based_Yardstick_Regulation_in_the_Swiss_Regional_Public_Bus_Industry. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
Fraquelli G, Piacenza M, Abrate G (2001) Il trasporto pubblico locale in Italia: variabili esplicative dei divari di costo tra le imprese. Economia e Politica industriale, 111, p 51–82
Italian Republic, Interministerial Decree no. 325 25/11/2011. http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/mop_all.php?p_id=16709. Accessed 20 Dec 2015
Italian Republic, Law 27/12/2013, no. 147 (stability Law 2014), paragraph 84. http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/_Documenti/VERSIONE-I/Attivit--i/Bilancio_di_previsione/Legge_di_stabilit/2014/Legge_di_Stabilitx_2014_Testo.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2015
Jørgensen F, Pedersen P, Solvoll G (1995) The cost of bus operations in Norway. J Transp Econ Policy 29(3):253–262
Levaggi R (1994) Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy. Studi Econ 49(53):67–88
Montalbo Jr. C, Ishida H (1997) Assessment of costs of bus transit operations in metro manila. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 2(5):1527–1546
Pulley LB, Braunstein YM (1992) A composite cost function for multiproduct firms with an application to economies of scope in banking. Rev Econ Stat 74:221–230
Steenberghen T, Pourbaix J, Moulin A, Bamps C, Keijers S (2013) Study on harmonized collection of European data and statistics in the field of urban transport and mobility; Final report http://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/themes/urban/studies/doc/2013-05-harmonised-collection-data-and-statistics-urban-transport.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petruccelli, U., Carleo, S. Cost models for local road transit. Public Transp 9, 527–548 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-017-0162-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-017-0162-2