Abstract
Bunching is a well-known operational problem for transit agencies and it has negative impacts on service quality and users’ perception. While there has been a substantial amount of literature about understanding the factors associated with bus bunching and strategies used to mitigate the effects of this problem, there has been little research on streetcar bunching. Although bus and streetcar systems share many similarities, one major difference between the two is that streetcars cannot overtake each other. This makes bunching in streetcar networks more critical to the reliability of the system and an important topic that requires more in-depth understanding. This research aims at understanding the factors that are associated with the likelihood of streetcar bunching and to investigate in greater detail the external and internal factors that relate to the time to the initial bunching incident from terminal. To achieve the first goal, the study uses a binary logistic regression model, while it uses an accelerated failure time model to address the second goal. The study utilizes automatic vehicle location system data acquired from the Toronto Transit Commission, the transit provider for the City of Toronto. The models’ results show that headway deviations at terminals are related to both an increase in the probability of bunching and an acceleration of the time to bunching. The discrepancy in vehicle types between two successive streetcars also has the same relationship as headway deviations at terminals. This study offers a better understanding of the factors that are associated with streetcar service bunching, which is an important component of transit service reliability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An S, Zhang X, Wang J (2015) Finding causes of irregular headways integrating data mining and AHP. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 4(4):2604–2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4042604
Andres M, Nair R (2017) A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching. Transp Res Part B Methodol 104:123–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.013
Bartholdi J, Eisenstein D (2012) A self-coördinating bus route to resist bus bunching. Transp Res Part B Methodol 46(4):481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.11.001
CBC (2013) Will Montreal finally get a modern tram? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/will-montreal-finally-get-a-modern-tram-1.1929470. Retrieved 3 May 2018
Currie G, Shalaby A (2008) Active transit signal priority for streetcars: experience in Melbourne, Australia, and Toronto, Canada. Transp Res Rec 2042:41–49. https://doi.org/10.3141/2042-05
Currie G, Delbosc A, Reynolds J (2012) Modeling dwell time for streetcars in Melbourne, Australia, and Toronto, Canada. Transp Res Rec 2275:22–29. https://doi.org/10.3141/2275-03
Currie G, Delbosc A, Harrison S, Sarvi M (2013) Impact of crowding on streetcar dwell time. Transp Res Rec 2353:100–106. https://doi.org/10.3141/2353-10
Currie G, Burke M, Delbosc A (2014) Performance of Australian Light Rail and comparison with U.S. trends. Transp Res Rec 2419:11–22. https://doi.org/10.3141/2419-02
Daganzo C (2009) A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: systematic analysis and comparisons. Transp Res Part B Methodol 43(10):913–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.04.002
Daganzo C, Pilachowski J (2011) Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 45(1):267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.06.005
Diab E, El-Geneidy A (2015) The farside story: measuring the benefits of bus stop location on transit performance. Transp Res Rec 2538:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2538-01
Diab E, Shalaby A (2018) Subway service down again? Assessing the effects of subway service interruptions on local surface transit performance. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118791665
Diab E, Bertini R, El-Geneidy A (2016) Bus transit service reliability: Understanding the impacts of overlapping bus service on headway delays and determinants of bus bunching. In: Paper presented at the the 95th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Feng W, Figliozzi M (2011) Empirical findings of bus bunching distributions and attributes using archived AVL/APC bus data. In: ICCTP 2011: towards sustainable transportation systems—proceedings of the 11th international conference of Chinese transportation professionals. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp 4330–4341
Hu W, Shalaby A (2017) Use of automated vehicle location data for route- and segment-level analyses of bus route reliability and speed. Transp Res Rec 2649:9–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2649-02
Hu W, Diab E, Aboudina A, Shalaby A (2018) The impact of various streetcar types on passenger activity and running times. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118797219
Jenkins SP (2008) Survival anaylsis. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester
Kalinowski T (2014) TTC wants to put some POP in your streetcar ride, with all-doors boarding by Jan. 1. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/08/08/ttc_wants_to_put_some_pop_in_your_streetcar_ride_with_alldoors_boarding_by_jan_1.html. Retrieved 3 May 2018
KCRTA (2017) Midtown/UMKC Streetcar Extension Resources—KCRTA. http://kcrta.org/streetcar/. Retrieved 3 May 2018
Kleinbaum D, Klein M (2005) Survival analysis: a self-learning text. Springer Science and Business Media, New York
Liang S, Zhao S, Lu C, Ma M (2016) A self-adaptive method to equalize headways: numerical analysis and comparison. Transp Res Part B Methodol 87:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.02.008
Ling K, Shalaby A (2005) A reinforcement learning approach to streetcar bunching control. J Intell Transp Syst 9(2):59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450590934615
Louie J, Shalaby A, Habib K (2017) Modelling the impact of causal and non-causal factors on disruption duration for Toronto’s subway system: an exploratory investigation using hazard modelling. Accid Anal Prev 98:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.008
Mandelzys M, Hellinga B (2010) Identifying causes of performance issues in bus schedule adherence with automatic vehicle location and passenger count data. Transp Res Rec 2143:9–15. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-02
Mesbah M, Lin J, Currie G (2015) “Weather” transit is reliable? Using AVL data to explore tram performance in Melbourne, Australia. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Edition) 2(3):125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2015.03.001
Moreira-Matias L, Ferreira C, Gama J, Mendes-Moreira J, de Sousa J (2012) Bus bunching detection by mining sequences of headway deviations. Springer, Berlin
Moreira-Matias L, Cats O, Gama J, Mendes-Moreira J, de Sousa J (2016) An online learning approach to eliminate bus bunching in real-time. Appl Soft Comput 47:460–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.031
Naznin F, Currie G, Logan D (2017) Streetcar safety from tram driver perspective. In: Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th annual meeting, Washington, DC
Petit A, Ouyang Y, Lei C (2018) Dynamic bus substitution strategy for bunching intervention. Transp Res Part B Methodol 115:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.06.001
Shalaby A, Abdulhai B, Lee J (2003) Assessment of streetcar transit priority options using microsimulation modelling. Can J Civ Eng 30(6):1000–1009. https://doi.org/10.1139/l03-010
Surprenant-Legault J, El-Geneidy A (2011) Introduction of reserved bus lane: impact on bus running time and on-time performance. Transp Res Rec 2218:10–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2218-02
TTC (2016a) TTC section one. http://www.ttc.ca/About_the_TTC/Operating_Statistics/2016/section_one.jsp. Retrieved 3 May 2018
TTC (2016b) TTC Service Summary January 3, 2016 to February 13, 2016. https://swanboatsteve.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/service_summary_2016_01_03.pdf. Retrieved 3 May 2017
TTC (2017) TTC general information. http://www.ttc.ca/About_the_TTC/Projects/New_Vehicles/New_Streetcars/FAQ/FAQ_GeneralInformation.jsp. Retrieved 3 May 2018
TTC (2018) Toronto Transit Commission CEO’s Report, October 2018. Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), Toronto
Verbich D, Diab E, El-Geneidy A (2016) Have they bunched yet? An exploratory study of the impacts of bus bunching on dwell and running times. Public Transp 8(2):225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0126-y
Xuan Y, Argote J, Daganzo C (2011) Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: optimal linear control and performance analysis. Transp Res Part B Methodol 45(10):1831–1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.009
Yu H, Chen D, Wu Z, Ma X, Wang Y (2016) Headway-based bus bunching prediction using transit smart card data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 72:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.007
Yu Z, Wood J, Gayah V (2017) Using survival models to estimate bus travel times and associated uncertainties. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 74:366–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.013
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Kenny Ling and Francis Li from the TTC for providing the data used in this paper. This research was funded by the Ontario Research Fund (ORF). The ideas and findings presented in this paper represent the authors’ views in an academic exercise.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, P., Diab, E. & Shalaby, A. Understanding the factors that influence the probability and time to streetcar bunching incidents. Public Transp 11, 299–320 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00201-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00201-4