Skip to main content
Log in

Procurement maturity and IT-alignment models: overview and a case study

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More and more firms urge their procurement departments to optimize their processes and leverage IT in order to reduce costs, increase quality and sustainability of received products and services, and shorten delivery times. Already in the nineties of the previous century Henderson and Venkatraman (IBM Systems Journal 32(1):4–16, 1993) identified business/IT-alignment as a key to organizational performance. Many maturity and IT-alignment models have since been developed, yet, specific procurement maturity models, including business/IT-alignment principles, are scarce. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of procurement maturity models that include IT-alignment. We start with a presentation of business/IT-alignment principles, detailing dimensions (areas of concern) for alignment, specifically for the procurement domain. Subsequently, maturity principles are discussed, resulting in maturity levels for the procurement domain. Finally, an in depth study of a specialized procurement model for the construction industry is presented, in which simulation techniques for testing are successfully applied. The discussed models and application justify a business/IT-alignment approach for procurement departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batenburg, R., Helms, R., & Versendaal, J. (2006). PLM roadmap: stepwise PLM implementation based on the concepts of maturity and alignment. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 1(4), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batenburg, R., & Versendaal, J. (2004). Business alignment in the CRM domain: Predicting CRM performance. Paper presented at the 12th European conference on information systems. Turku, Finland.

  • Batenburg, R., & Versendaal, J. (2008). Maturity matters: Performance determinants of the procurement business function. Paper presented at the 16th European conference on information systems. Galway, Ireland.

  • Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Pöppelbuß, J. & Simons, A. (2010). Maturity models in IS research. Paper presented at the 18th European conference on information systems, Pretoria, South Africa.

  • Beukers, M., Versendaal, J., Batenburg, R., & Brinkkemper, S. (2006). The procurement alignment framework: construction and application. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 48(5), 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A., & Swan, J. (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1535–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2000). Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2), 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., van de Weerd, I., & Versendaal, J. (2008). Process improvement in requirements management: a method engineering approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5052, 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consulting, C. (2008). Supplier relationship management solutions: SRM research 2008–2009 solution analyses and business insights. Utrecht: Capgemini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. C. P., Law, K. H., Bjornsson, H., Jones, A., & Sriram, R. (2010). A service oriented framework for construction supply chain integration. Automation in Construction, 19(2), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E. K., Reddi, S. P., & Row, M. C. (1993). The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the ‘move to the middle’ hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007). Impact of e-procurement: experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 13, 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, L., Harink, J., & Heijboer, G. (2002). A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 8(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system—implications for productivity and innovatively. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eadie, R., Perera, S., & Heaney, G. (2010). Identification of e-procurement drivers and barriers for UK construction organizations and ranking of these from the perspective of quantity surveyors. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15.

  • Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (1998). Learning and innovation management in project-based, service-enhanced firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2(4), 431–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffee, D. T. (2005). Research tips: interview data collection. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(3), 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organization: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7–8), 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S., & Skodol-Wilson, H. (1992). Validity threats in scheduled semi structured research interviews. Nursing Research, 41(2), 117–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroese, E., Teuling, J. den., Versendaal, J., Batenburg, R. & Kamp-Slootweg, H. van de (2008). Aligning procurement: An e-procurement mapping and deployment model. Paper presented at the 17th Annual conference of the international purchasing & supply education and research association, Perth, Australia.

  • Law, A. M. (2009). How to build valid and credible simulation models. Paper presented at the 37th Conference on winter simulation, Austin, USA.

  • Lawinski, J. (2011). Business, IT alignment a top priority for CIOs. CIO insight newsletter. retrieved 2012-09-10, from http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/IT-Management/Business-IT-Alignment-a-Top-Priority-for-CIOs-547064/.

  • Leech, L. B. (2002). Techniques for semi structured interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loggen, R., Havenith, M., Spekschoor, J., Versendaal, J., & Ravesteijn, P. (2011). Business process management in The Netherlands (In Dutch). Utrecht: Capgemini Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luftman, J.N., Papp, R. & Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and Inhibitors of Business-IT Alignment. Communications of the Association for Information System, Vol 1. Article 11.

  • Maes, R., Rijsenbrij, D., Truijens, O., & Goedvolk, H. (2000). Redefining business-IT alignment through a unified framework. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, T., & Rohner, P. (2009). Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minahan, T. & Degan, G. (2001). Best practices in e-procurement. Boston: Aberdeen group. The abridged report. Retrieved 2010-03-01 from http://www.hedgehog.com/resources/e-ProcurementAbridged.pdf.

  • Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (1998). Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, M. & Batenburg, R. (2009). Procurement maturity, alignment and performance: A Dutch hospital case comparison. Paper presented at the 22nd Bled eConference, Bled, Slovenia.

  • Pollice, F. & Fleury, A. (2011). The link between purchasing and supply management maturity models and the financial performance of international firms. Retrieved 2011-11-03 from http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/cim/symposium2010/proceedings/3_pollice.pdf.

  • Pooley, R. (2007). Behavioral equivalence in simulation modeling. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, 15, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, J. H., & Luther, R. (2006). The innovation process: adoption of information and communication technology for the construction industry. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(12), 1538–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raschke, R.L. & Ingraham, L.R. (2010). Business process maturity’s effect on performance. Paper presented at the 16th Americas conference on information systems, Lima, Peru.

  • Rosemann, M. & de Bruin, T. (2005). Towards a business process management maturity model. Paper presented at the 13th European conference on information systems, Regensburg, Germany.

  • Rozemeijer, F. (2000). How to manage corporate purchasing synergy in a decentralized company? Towards design rules for managing and organizing purchasing synergy in decentralized companies. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper, W. (2002). Business IT alignment: Solution for the productivity paradox (In Dutch). Utrecht: Deloitte & Touche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H. (2007). Supply-management maturity, cost savings and purchasing absorptive capacity: testing the procurement-performance link. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(4), 274–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalenhoef, K., Goedhart, E., van de Kamp, H., & van der Heijden, G. (2007). World-class purchasing. Utrecht: Berenschot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiry, M., & Deguire, M. (2007). Recent developments in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1996). Discipline of market leaders: Choose your customer, narrow your focus, dominate your market. London: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E., McLean, E., & Wetherbe, J. (1999). Information technology for management: making connections for strategic advantage. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Versendaal, J., & Brinkkemper, S. (2003). Benefits and success factors of buyer-owned electronic trading exchanges: procurement at Komatsu America Corporation. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, 5(4), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weele, A. J. (2005). Purchasing and supply chain management: Analysis, strategy, planning and practice. London: Thomson International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weele, A. J. van, Rozemeijer, F.A. & Rietveld, G. (2000). Professional development of purchasing in organizations: Towards a purchasing development model. Global purchasing & supply chain strategies. Retrieved 2011-10-03, from http://www.touchbriefings.com/cdps/cditem.cfm?nid=977&cid=9.

  • van de Wijngaert, L., Versendaal, J., & Matla, R. (2008). Business IT alignment and technology adoption; the case of RFID in the logistics domain. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 3(1), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitmen, I. (2007). The challenge of change for innovation in construction: a North Cyprus perspective. Building and Environment, 42(3), 1319–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Versendaal.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hans-Dieter Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Versendaal, J., van den Akker, M., Xing, X. et al. Procurement maturity and IT-alignment models: overview and a case study. Electron Markets 23, 295–306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-013-0130-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-013-0130-x

Keywords

JEL

Navigation