Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design-integrated financial assessment of smart services

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of data-driven services in the Internet of Things provides manufacturers of technical products the opportunity to become providers of services, which use data as primary input. The development of such smart services, however, is characterized by high complexity and uncertainty. To identify service ideas which are worth to pursue further, the potential financial impact is an important criterion. While the importance of a business case is acknowledged in service engineering, there is currently no concrete method that is integrated with the early design phases of smart services. Therefore, we propose a tool-based method for the design-integrated financial assessment of smart services. We use a design science research approach to develop a meta-model, which is implemented in a web-based tool. The experimental evaluation shows that the proposed tool provides benefits, especially in structuring the task for project teams. Therefore, it appears to be beneficial to provide interdisciplinary teams a tool-based support for the design and evaluation of smart services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrodegari, F., Alghisi, A., Ardolino, M., & Saccani, N. (2015). From ownership to service-oriented business models: A survey in capital goods companies and a PSS typology. Procedia CIRP, 30, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210443391.

  • Allmendinger, G., & Lombreglia, R. (2005). Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 131.

  • Aurich, J. C., Fuchs, C., & Wagenknecht, C. (2006). Life cycle oriented design of technical product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1480–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.019.

  • Azizyan G, Magarian MK, Kajko-Matsson M (2011) Survey of agile tool usage and needs. In: AGILE Conference. IEEE, pp 29–38.

  • Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Evans, S., Neely, A., Greenough, R., Peppard, J.,. . . Wilson, H. (2007). State-of the-art in product-service systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 221(10), 1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM858.

  • Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Benedettini, O., & Kay, J. M. (2009). The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(5), 547–567.

  • Barbosa J, Leitão P, Trentesaux D, Karnouskos S (2016) Cross Benefits from Cyber-Physical Systems and Intelligent Products for Future Smart Industries. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

  • Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2015). Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 135–154.

  • Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Knackstedt, R., & Müller, O. (2009). Model-based decision support for the customer-specific configuration of value bundles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.4.1.3.

  • Bilgeri, D., Brandt, V., Lang, M., Tesch, J., & Weinberger, M. (2015). The IoT Business Model Builder. Bosch IoT Lab White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.boschsi.com/media/bosch_si/services/iot_business_consulting/whitepaper_iot-business-model-builder.pdf

  • Böhmann, T., Leimeister, J. M., & Möslein, K. (2014). Service systems engineering. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0314-8.

  • Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J. (2001). Customer orientation. Journal of Service Research, 3(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050133005.

  • Carpanen, P., Patricío, L., & Ribeiro, B. (2016). Designing Product Service Systems in the Context of Social Internet of Things. In T. Borangiu, M. Dragoicea, & H. Nóvoa (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Vol. 247. Exploring Services Science: 7th International Conference, IESS 2016, Bucharest, Romania, May 25-27, 2016, Proceedings (Vol. 247, pp. 419–431). Cham, s.l.: Springer International Publishing.

  • Caulkins, J. P., Morrison, E. L., & Weidemann, T. (2007). Spreadsheet errors and decision making. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 19(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2007070101.

  • Cavalieri, S., & Pezzotta, G. (2012). Product–Service Systems Engineering: State of the art and research challenges. Product Service System Engineering: from Theory to Industrial Applications Product Service System Engineering: from Theory to Industrial Applications, 63(4), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.006.

  • Columbus L (2017) Internet Of Things Market To Reach $267B By 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2017/01/29/internet-of-things-market-to-reach-267b-by-2020/#c5804d609bd6. Accessed 18 September 2017.

  • Craven, M. P., Morgan, S. P., Crowe, J. A., & Lu, B. (2013). Deploying a spreadsheet tool for early economic value assessment of medical device innovations with healthcare decision makers. Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare, 2(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1179/mmh.2009.2.3.278.

  • Dewit I, Roeck D de, & Baelus C (2014) Roadmap and toolbox for the ideation stage of the development process of product Service Systems. In 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2375.1045

  • Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y.

  • Ehrenhofer C, Kreuzer E (2012) The role of business model Design in the Service Engineering Process: A comparative case study in the field of cloud computing to join service engineering with business model design. In: SRII Global Conference (SRII), 2012 Annual. [publisher not identified], [Place of publication not identified], pp 283–292.

  • Fischer, T., Gebauer, H., & Fleisch, E. (2012). Service business development: Strategies for Value Creation in Manufacturing Firms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisch, E., Weinberger, M., & Wortmann, F. (2015). Business models and the internet of things. In I. Podnar Žarko, K. Pripužić, & M. Serrano (Eds.), Interoperability and open-source solutions for the internet of things: International workshop, FP7 OpenIoT project, vol 9001 (pp. 6–10).

  • Georgakopoulos, D., & Jayaraman, P. P. (2016). Internet of things: From internet scale sensing to smart services. Computing, 98(10), 1041–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0510-0.

  • Grässle P, Smith C, Baumann H, Baumann P, Chakrabarti P (2005) UML 2.0 in action: A project based tutorial. Packt Pub, Birmingham, U.K.

  • Grossman, T. A., Mehrotra, V., & Özlük, Ö. (2007). Lessons from mission-critical spreadsheets. Communications of the Assoc. for Information Systems, 20(1), 60.

  • Herterich, M., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2015). The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial Services in Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 30, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herterich M, Eck A, Uebernickel F (2016) Exploring how Digitized Products enable Industrial Service Innovation - An Affordance Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems.

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

  • Isaksson, O., Larsson, T. C., & Johansson, P. (2011). Towards a framework for developing product/service systems. In J. Hesselbach & C. Herrmann (Eds.), Functional thinking for value creation (pp. 44–49). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, P., & Perjons, E. (2014). Define Requirements. In P. Johannesson & E. Perjons (Eds.), An introduction to design science (pp. 103–116). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Kambanou, M. L., & Lindahl, M. (2016). A literature review of life cycle costing in the product-service system context. Procedia CIRP, 47, 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kees A, Oberlaender AM, Roeglinger M, Rosemann M (2015) Understanding the Internet of Things: A Conceptualisation of Business-to-Thing (B2T) Interactions. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2015), Münster.

  • Kim T, Bae D (2012) Stakeholder Conflict Resolving Model in PSS Design. In: Cumulus Helsinki Conference.

  • Kim, S., Son, C., Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2015). Development of an innovation model based on a service-oriented product service system (PSS). Sustainability, 7(11), 14427–14449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71114427.

  • Kim, K.-J., Lim, C.-H., Heo, J.-Y., Lee, D.-H., Hong, Y.-S., & Park, K. (2016). An evaluation scheme for product–service system models: Development of evaluation criteria and case studies. Service Business, 10(3), 507–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-015-0280-3.

  • Klein, R., Herrmann, K., Scheer, A.-W., & Spath, D. (Eds.). (2004). Computer aided service engineering. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortuem, G., Kawsar, F., Fitton, D., & Sundramoorthy, V. (2010). Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2009.143.

  • Laatikainen G, Ojala A, Mazhelis O (2013) Cloud Services Pricing Models. In: Herzwurm G, Margaria T (eds) Software business: From physical products to software services and solutions : 4th International Conference, ICSOB 2013, Potsdam, Germany, June 11–14, 2013 : proceedings, vol 150. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–129.

  • Laudien, S. M., & Daxböck, B. (2016). The influence model of the industrial internet of things on business model design: A qualitative-empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(08), 1640014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616400144.

  • Laurischkat, K. (2013). Computer-aided Service Design for the Development of product-service systems – Motivation and benefits. In H. Meier (Ed.), Product-service integration for sustainable solutions: Proceedings of the 5th CIRP international conference on industrial product-service systems (pp. 547–560). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão, P., Rodrigues, N., Barbosa, J., Turrin, C., & Pagani, A. (2015). Intelligent products: The grace experience. Control Engineering Practice, 42, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C.-H., Kim, M.-J., Heo, J.-Y., & Kim, K.-J. (2015). Design of informatics-based services in manufacturing industries: Case studies using large vehicle-related databases. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 50(4), 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1123-8.

  • Lin, F.-R., & Hsieh, P.-S. (2011). A SAT view on new service development. Service Science, 3(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.3.2.141.

  • Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2016). Data collection and wireless communication in internet of things (IoT) using economic analysis and pricing models: A survey. IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, 18(4), 2546–2590. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2582841.

  • Maglio PP, Lim C-H (2016) Innovation and big data in smart service systems. Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 11–21.

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2013). A service science perspective on business model innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.007.

  • March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.

  • Marilungo, E., Coscia, E., Quaglia, A., Peruzzini, M., & Germani, M. (2016). Open innovation for ideating and designing new product service systems. Procedia CIRP, 47, 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.214.

  • Marilungo, E., Papetti, A., Germani, M., & Peruzzini, M. (2017). From PSS to CPS design: A real industrial use case toward industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 64, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, P., Cunha, P. F., Valente, F., & Leitão, A. (2013). A methodology for product-service systems development. Procedia CIRP, 7, 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, C. A. N., Mendes, G. H. S., Oliveira, M. G., & Rozenfeld, H. (2016). Comparing PSS design models based on content analysis. Procedia CIRP, 47, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, A., & Kundu, S. (2014). A representation scheme for digital product service system definitions. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 28(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2014.07.004.

  • Medina-Borja, A. (2015). Editorial column—Smart things as service providers: A call for convergence of disciplines to build a research agenda for the Service Systems of the Future. Service Science, 7(1), ii–iv. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2014.0090.

  • Mikusz, M. (2014). Towards an understanding of cyber-physical systems as industrial software-product-service systems. Procedia CIRP, 16, 385–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourtzis, D., Fotia, S., & Doukas, M. (2015). Performance indicators for the evaluation of product-service systems design: A review. In S. Umeda, M. Nakano, H. Mizuyama, H. Hibino, D. Kiritsis, & G. von Cieminski (Eds.), Innovative production management towards sustainable growth, vol 460 (pp. 592–601). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. (2008). Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing. Operations Management Research, 1(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0015-5.

  • Niemöller, C., Özcan, D., Metzger, D., & Thomas, O. (2014). Towards a Design Science-Driven Product-Service System Engineering Methodology. In D. Hutchison, T. Kanade, J. Kittler, J. M. Kleinberg, A. Kobsa, F. Mattern, J. C. Mitchell, M. Naor, O. Nierstrasz, C. Pandu Rangan, B. Steffen, D. Terzopoulos, D. Tygar, G. Weikum, M. C. Tremblay, D. VanderMeer, M. Rothenberger, A. Gupta, & V. Yoon (Eds.), Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice, vol 8463 (pp. 180–193). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Omann, I. (2003). Product service systems and their impacts on sustainable development. Frontiers, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panko, R. R., & Aurigemma, S. (2010). Revising the panko-Halverson taxonomy of spreadsheet errors. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 235–244.

  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.

  • Peruzzini M, Marilungo E, Germani M (2015) Technical-business design methodology for PSS. In: ISPE CE, pp 513–522.

  • Pezzotta, G., Pirola, F., Pinto, R., Akasaka, F., & Shimomura, Y. (2015). A service engineering framework to design and assess an integrated product-service. Mechatronics, 31, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni, M., Marques, C., Campese, C., Guzzo, D., Mendes, G., Costa, J., Rosa, M., MGd, O., Macul, V., & Rozenfeld, H. (2016). Transforming a traditional product offer into PSS: A practical application. Procedia CIRP, 47, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2014) How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard business review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/11/how-smart-connected-products-aretransforming-competition.

  • Prat N, Comyn-Wattiau I, Akoka J (2014) Artifact Evaluation in Information Systems Design Science Research ? A Holistic View. In: Proceeding of the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.

  • Püschel L, Schlott H, Röglinger M (2016) What’s in a Smart Thing? Development of a Multi-layer Taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).

  • Recker J (2013) Scientific research in Information Systems: A beginner’s guide. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  • Reschenhofer, T., & Matthes, F. (2015). An Empirical Study on Spreadsheet Shortcomings from an Information Systems Perspective. In W. Abramowicz (Ed.), 18 th International Conference on Business information systems, vol 208 (pp. 50–61). Cham: Springer.

  • Sakao, T., & Lindahl, M. (2012). A value based evaluation method for product/service system using design information. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 61(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.108.

  • Sas, D., & Lindström, J. (2014). Advancing development of product-service systems using ideas from functional product development. Procedia CIRP, 21, 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, J. O., Kloeckner, A. P., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Pezzotta, G., & Pirola, F. (2016). Product-service system (PSS) design: Using design thinking and business analytics to improve PSS design. Procedia CIRP, 47, 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholze, S., Correia, A. T., & Stokic, D. (2016). Novel tools for product-service system engineering. Procedia CIRP, 47, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw N (2014) Looking ahead: Is this the future? Canyon reveal new project bike. http://enduro-mtb.com/en/looking-ahead-is-this-the-future-canyon-presents-a-new-project-bike/. Accessed 25 November 2016.

  • Sonnenberg, C., & Vom Brocke, J. (2012). Evaluation Patterns for Design Science Research Artefacts. In M. Helfert & B. Donnellan (Eds.), Practical aspects of design science: European Design Science Symposium, EDSS 2011, Leixlip, Ireland, October 14, 2011, vol 286 (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowiak, H. (1973). Allgemeine Modelltheorie. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiller, B., Barlet-Ros, P., Cushnie, J., Domingo-Pascual, J., Hutchison, D., Lopes, R., Mauthe, A., Popa, M., Roberts, J., Solé-Pareta, J., Trcek, D., & Veciana, C. (2003). Pricing and QoS. In M. Smirnov, E. Biersack, C. Blondia, O. Bonaventure, O. Casals, G. Karlsson, G. Pavlou, B. Quoitin, J. Roberts, I. Stavrakakis, B. Stiller, P. Trimintzios, & P. van Mieghem (Eds.), Quality of future Internet services: COST Action 263 final report (pp. 263–292). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thoben, K.-D., Eschenbächer, J., & Jagdev, H. S. (2003). Emerging concepts in E-business and extended products. In J. Gasós & K.-D. Thoben (Eds.), E-business applications: Technologies for Tommorow’s solutions (pp. 17–37). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; imprint; Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414.

  • Vasantha, G. A. V., Roy, R., Lelah, A., & Brissaud, D. (2012). A review of product-service systems design methodologies. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(9), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.639712.

  • Velamuri, V. K., Bansemir, B., Neyer, A.-K., & Möslein, K. M. (2013). Product service systems as a driver for business model innovation: Lessons learned from the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1340004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613400045.

  • Visnjic I, Jovanovic M, Neely A, Engwall M (2016) What brings the value to outcome-based contract providers?: Value drivers in outcome business models. International Journal of Production Economics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.008.

  • Wallin, J. (2013). Turning internal product knowledge into external service offers: Building PSS capabilities. In Y. Shimomura & K. Kimita (Eds.), The Philosopher’s stone for sustainability: Proceedings of the 4 th CIRP International Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems, Tokyo, Japan, November 8 th - 9 th , 2012 (pp. 327–332). Berlin: Springer.

  • Weinberger M, Bilgeri D, Fleisch E (2016) IoT business models in an industrial context. at - Automatisierungstechnik 64(9). https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2016-0054.

  • Wiesner, S., & Thoben, K.-D. (2017). Cyber-physical product-service systems. In S. Biffl, A. Lüder, & D. Gerhard (Eds.), Multi-disciplinary engineering for cyber-physical production systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, S., Winkler, M., Eschenbächer, J., & Thoben, K.-D. (2013). Strategies for extended product business models in manufacturing service ecosystems. In H. Meier (Ed.), Product-service integration for sustainable solutions: Proceedings of the 5 th CIRP international conference on industrial product-service systems (pp. 239–250). Berlin: Springer.

  • Wilde T (2008) Experimentelle Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Analyse des Methodenpotenzials und Entwicklung geeigneter Experimentaldesigns. Schriftenreihe Studien zur Wirtschaftsinformatik, Bd. 27. Kovač, Hamburg.

  • Wortmann, F., & Flüchter, K. (2015). Internet of things. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(3), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0383-3.

  • Wuenderlich, N. V., Heinonen, K., Ostrom, A. L., Patricio, L., Sousa, R., Voss, C., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2015). “Futurizing” smart service: Implications for service researchers and managers. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0040.

  • Yang, X., Moore, P., Pu, J.-S., & Wong, C.-B. (2009). A practical methodology for realizing product service systems for consumer products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(1), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.05.008.

  • Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322.

  • Zolnowski, A., & Böhmann, T. (2013). Veränderungstreiber service-orientierter Geschäftsmodelle. In T. Böhmann, M. Warg, & P. Weiß (Eds.), Service-orientierte Geschäftsmodelle (pp. 31–52). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zolnowski A, Christiansen T, Gudat J (2016) Business Model Transformation Patterns of Data-Driven Innovations. In: Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule für Telekommunikation Leipzig, Gustav-Freytag-Straße 43-45, 04277, Leipzig, Germany

    Jürgen Anke

Authors
  1. Jürgen Anke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Anke.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Haluk Demirkan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anke, J. Design-integrated financial assessment of smart services. Electron Markets 29, 19–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0300-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0300-y

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation