Abstract
Inter-firm negotiations are often non-discrete: they are not isolated exchange episodes, but part of an ongoing process of building strategic relationships between the firms. This view posits a challenge to the design and application of negotiation mechanisms in e-markets supporting business-to-business exchanges. The assessment of the mechanisms needs to include both the impacts within each discrete exchange episode and those shaping the future of the inter-firm relationships. We argue that strategies of information revelation implemented with negotiation mechanisms can influence participants’ fairness perceptions, which can further affect business relationships. The paper examines both substantive and subjective measures in an experiment involving two multi-bilateral negotiations with distinct information disclosure strategies. The results show that the revelation of the best offer affects participants’ perceived fairness which, in turn, positively influences intention to do business. The findings have implications for both the design and use of negotiation mechanisms where inter-firm relationships are concerned.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For detailed introduction about the used system, please visit http://invite.concordia.ca/imbins/
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Agndal, H., Åge, L.-J., & Eklinder-Frick, J. (2017). Two decades of business negotiation research: An overview and suggestions for future studies. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2015-0233.
Albin, C. (1993). The role of fairness in negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 9(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000696
Albin, C., & Druckman, D. (2010). The role of justice in negotiation. In: D. M. Kilgour & C. Eden (Eds.), Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation (pp. 109-119), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_7
Albin, C., & Druckman, D. (2014). Procedures matter: Justice and effectiveness in international trade negotiations. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 1014–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114523654
Alt, R. (2018). Electronic Markets on digitalization. Electronic Markets, 28(4), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0320-7.
Alt, R., & Klein, S. (2011). Twenty years of electronic markets research - looking backwards towards the future. Electronic Markets, 21(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0057-z.
Arnot, C., Boxall, P. C., & Cash, S. B. (2006). Do ethical consumers care about Price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 54(4), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2006.00066.x.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1(1), 43–55.
Bunduchi, R. (2008). Trust, power and transaction costs in B2B exchanges -a socio-economic approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(5), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.003
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009
Charki, M. H., Josserand, E., & Charki, N. B. (2011). Toward an ethical understanding of the controversial technology of online reverse auctions. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0532-z
Claro, D. P., Hagelaar, G., & Omta, O. (2003). The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships? Industrial Marketing Management, 32(8), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.06.010.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Ppplied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602.
De Ferran, F., & Grunert, K. G. (2007). French fair trade coffee buyers’ purchasing motives: An exploratory study using means-end chains analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 18(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.11.001.
Diekmann, K. A., Soderberg, A. T., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2013). Fairness and ethics in bargaining and negotiation. In M. Olekalns & W. L. Adair (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Negotiation (pp. 191–220). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7275/da8t-4g52
Druckman, D., & Wagner, L. (2017). Justice and fairness in negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9496-4
Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7.
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 65). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gao, H., & Liu, D. (2014). Relationship of trustworthiness and relational benefit in electronic catalog markets. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-013-0142-6.
Gassenheimer, J. B., Houston, F. S., & Davis, J. C. (1998). The role of economic value, social value, and perceptions of fairness in Interorganizational relationship retention decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398264005.
Gattiker, T. F., Huang, X., & Schwarz, J. L. (2007). Negotiation, email, and internet reverse auctions: How sourcing mechanisms deployed by buyers affect suppliers’ trust. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.007
Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 70–103). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Güth, W. (1995). On ultimatum bargaining experiments - a personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)00071-L.
Güth, W., & van Damme, E. (1998). Information, strategic behavior, and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42(2–3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1998.1212.
Haitao Cui, T., Raju, J. S., & Zhang, Z. J. (2007). Fairness and channel coordination. Management Science, 53(8), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0697.
Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods, an interaction approach, IMP project group (Ed.). Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London and New York: Routledge Londres.
Harland, C. M. (1996). Supply chain management: Relationships, chains and networks. British Journal of Management, 7, S63–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00148.x
Hayne, S. C., Bugbee, B., & Wang, H. (2010). Bidder behaviours on eBay: Collectibles and commodities. Electronic Markets, 20(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0036-9.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660.
Hollander-Blumoff, R., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). Procedural justice in negotiation: Procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(2), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00110.x
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc..
Huang, J. H., Chang, C. T., & Chen, C. Y. H. (2005). Perceived fairness of pricing on the internet. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.03.002
Jaffee, D. (2014). Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Oakland: University of California Press.
Kersten, G. E., Vahidov, R., & Gimon, D. (2013). Concession-making in multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations: Theory and experiments. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.02.002
Kersten, G. E., Wachowicz, T., & Kersten, M. (2016). Competition, transparency, and reciprocity: A comparative study of auctions and negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(4), 693–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9471-0
Kim, T.-Y., & Leung, K. (2007). Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004
Liu, Y., Li, Y., Shi, L. H., & Liu, T. (2017). Knowledge transfer in buyer-supplier relationships: The role of transactional and relational governance mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 78, 285–293.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.024
McGinn, K. L. (2006). Relationships and negotiations in context. In: L. L. Thompson (Ed.), Negotiation theory and research (pp. 129–144). New York: Psychology Press.
Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (1999). Business relationships and networks: Managerial challenge of network era. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00086-3.
Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2018). IMP thinking and IMM: Co-creating value for business marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.025
O’Malley, L. (2014). Relational marketing: Development, debates and directions. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(11–12), 1220–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.939592
Ocker, F. (2018). “Bid more, pay less” – Overbidding and the Bidder’s curse in teleshopping auctions. Electronic Markets, 28(4), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0295-4.
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249
Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D., & Leigh Taylor, P. (2004). Fair trade coffee: Building producer capacity via global networks. Journal of International Development, 16(8), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1136.
Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068–1095.
Sambhara, C., Rai, A., Keil, M., & Kasi, V. (2017). Risks and controls in internet-enabled reverse auctions: Perspectives from buyers and suppliers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(4), 1113–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1394071
Smith, V. (2003). Markets, institutions and experiments. In: L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 991–998). London: Nature Publishing Group.
Stevens, G. C., & Johnson, M. (2016). Integrating the supply chain… 25 years on. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2015-0175
Straub, P. G., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)00072-M
Strecker, S. (2010). Information revelation in multiattribute English auctions: A laboratory study. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.002.
Suter, T. A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2005). Maximizing earnings and price fairness perceptions in online consumer-to-consumer auctions. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.01.007
Tan, C. H., Teo, H. H., & Xu, H. (2010). Online auction: The effects of transaction probability and listing price on a seller’s decision-making behavior. Electronic Markets, 20(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0029-8.
Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Thomas, C. J., & Wilson, B. J. (2002). A comparison of auctions and multilateral negotiations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 33(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696379
Thomas, C. J., & Wilson, B. J. (2005). Verifiable offers and the relationship between auctions and multilateral negotiations. The Economic Journal, 115(506), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01030.x
Turel, O., & Yuan, Y. (2008). You can't shake hands with clenched fists: Potential effects of trust assessments the adoption of e-negotiation services. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9079-5
Van Raaij, E. M., & Caniels, M. C. (2009). Supplier perceived fairness of electronic reverse auctions. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2009.44256480
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.
Woo, K. S., & Ennew, C. T. (2004). Business-to-business relationship quality: An IMP interaction-based conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1252–1271. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410548960
Yilmaz, C., Sezen, B., & Kabadayı, E. T. (2004). Supplier fairness as a mediating factor in the supplier performance–reseller satisfaction relationship. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00485-X.
Yu, B., Kersten, G. E., & Vahidov, R. (2015). Traders’ subjective appraisals: Comparison of negotiations and auctions. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 25(3), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1058111.
Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K. K., Ramsey, E., McCole, P., & Chen, H. (2011). Repurchase intention in B2C e-commerce - a relationship quality perspective. Information & Management, 48(6), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.05.003.
Zhou, L., Wang, W., Xu, J., Liu, T., & Gu, J. (2018). Perceived information transparency in B2C e-commerce: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 55(7), 912–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.04.005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Christiane Lehrer
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 56 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, B., Kersten, G.E. & Vahidov, R. An experimental examination of credible information disclosure, perception of fairness, and intention to do business in online multi-bilateral negotiations. Electron Markets 32, 217–237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00473-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00473-4