Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying the First Principles of Instruction in a short-term, high volume, rapid production of online professional development modules

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a case study conducted to examine the application of Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction (Educ Technol Res Dev 50(3):43–59, 2002, First principles of instruction, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, 2012) to determine how they were implemented during a fast-paced project that required the creation of a large number of online modules. Design and development research (Richey and Klein in Design and development research, Routledge/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 2007) was employed to investigate the conditions and factors that impacted the decisions made by a design team including project leads, team leads, and instructional designers. Findings revealed that project requirements, personnel, physical setting, time, designer experience, training and team meetings influenced the use of the First Principles of Instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collins, B., & Margaryan, A. (2005). Design criteria for work-based learning: Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction expanded. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 725–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. P. (1984). Paradigms for research in instructional systems. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(4), 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. L. (2010). Applying Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction: Practical methods based on a review of the literature. Educational Technology, 50(2), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. L. (2011a). How Award-winning professors in higher education use Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(5), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. L. (2011b). Testing the efficacy of Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction in improving student performance in introductory biology courses. (Utah State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/862644295?accountid=4840

  • Gardner, J. L., & Jeon, T. (2009). Creating task-centered instruction for web-based instruction: Obstacles and solution. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? TechTrends, 47(5), 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse of Information & Technology, Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Mendenhall, A., & Johnson, T. E. (2010). A design framework for an online English writing course. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & Kinshuk (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 345–360). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Richey, R. C. (2015). Design and development research. In J. M. Spector, T. Johnson, D. Ifenthaler, W. Savenye, & M. Wang (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 183–184). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, A., Buhanan, C., Suhaka, M., Mills, G., Gibson, G., & Merrill, M. D. (2006). A task-centered approach to entrepreneurship. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 50(4), 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First Principles of Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2009a). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology, 46(4), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2009b). Finding e3 (effective, efficient and engaging) Instruction. Educational Technology, 49(3), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2012). First Principles of Instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauchfuss, G. H. (2010). How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles. Capella University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/741708813?accountid=4840

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633–651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating Instructional Design and Development Models. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack, & D. Wiley (Eds.), Innovation in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 171–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Research on design and development. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 748–757). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers’ decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, Florida State University, 1114 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4453, USA

    James D. Klein

  2. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 290 North 500 West, Suite 201, Bountiful, UT, 84010, USA

    Anne Mendenhall

Authors
  1. James D. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Mendenhall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Klein.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research study was not funded and there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, J.D., Mendenhall, A. Applying the First Principles of Instruction in a short-term, high volume, rapid production of online professional development modules. J Comput High Educ 30, 93–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9166-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9166-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation