Abstract
The application of online authentic language data has played an increasingly important role in language teaching. These include freely available online corpora such as the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. However, students are easily overwhelmed by the enormous amount of incomplete sentences (concordance lines) contained therein and therefore may fail to consult keywords and expressions as a resource tool. As an alternative resource a new web-based platform for English language learning, called Sketch Engine for Language Learning (SkELL), has been developed. Unlike the aforementioned corpora, SkELL generates sufficient amount of complete sentences which help students learn multiple examples of lexical and grammatical items in context. However, little research has been conducted as to how Japanese students with lower English proficiency assess the efficacy of SkELL. This study aims to examine the potential and limitation of SkELL in the language classroom for Japanese students who have almost no online experience in educational settings. The findings indicate that there is a close relationship between students’ view of the utilisation and efficacy of the resource and their attitudes toward English education. The study concludes with a discussion of pedagogical implications of the use of SkELL as a valuable educational tool for students who are accustomed to traditional English language learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Lower proficiency” describes students whose English proficiencies are somewhere between beginner and intermediate level, for example CEFR A1 or below.
References
Aspinall, R. W. (2013). International education policy in japan in an age of globalization and risk. Leiden: Global Oriental.
Baisa, V., & Suchomel, V. (2014). SkELL: Web interface for English language learning. In A. Horák, & P. Rychlý (Eds.), Proceedings of recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing (pp. 63–70).
Bao, D. (2014). Understanding silence and reticence: Ways of participating in second language acquisition. London: Bloomsbury.
Barrs, K. (2016). Using the sketch engine corpus query tool for language teaching. The Language Teaching, 40(2), 23–26.
Boulton, A. (2012). Beyond concordancing: Multiple affordances of corpora in university language degrees. Procedia: Social Behavioral Sciences, 34, 33–38.
Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2012). Issues in corpus-informed research and learning in ESP. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP. Issues and applications (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
Boulton, A., & Tyne, H. (2015). Corpus-based study of language and teacher education. In M. Bigelow & J. Ennser-Kananen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 301–312). London: Routledge.
Braun, S. (2007). Integrating corpus work into secondary education: From data-driven learning to needs-driven corpora. ReCALL, 19(3), 307–328.
Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 111–125.
Cooker, L., & Torpey, M. (2004). From the classroom to the self-access centre: A chronicle of learner-centred curriculum development. The Language Teacher, 28(6), 11–16.
Dunkel, P. A. (1986). Developing listening fluency in L2: Theoretical perspectives and pedagogical considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 70(ii), 99–106.
Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42.
Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118.
Humphries, S., & Burns, A. (2015). In reality it’s almost impossible’: CLT-oriented curriculum change. ELT Journal, 69(3), 239–248.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes. An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Johnson, K. (2008). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Kilgarriff, A., Marcowitz, F., Smith, S., & Thomas, J. (2015). Corpora and language learning with the sketch engine and SKELL. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 20(1), 61–80.
Mishan, F. (2004). Authenticating corpora for language learning: A problem and its resolution. ELT Journal, 58(3), 219–227.
Shudong, W., & Higgins, M. (2006). Limitations of mobile phone learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 3–14.
Sketch Engine for Language Learning. (2018). Lexical Computing Ltd. Retrieved October 20, 2018 from https://skell.sketchengine.co.uk/run.cgi/skell.
The Next Stage to the TOEIC Test. (2011). Tokyo: Kinseido.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirata, Y., Hirata, Y. Applying ‘Sketch Engine for Language Learning’ in the Japanese English classroom. J Comput High Educ 31, 233–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09208-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09208-z