Skip to main content
Log in

Quadratic factorization heuristics for copositive programming

  • Full Length Paper
  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Copositive optimization problems are particular conic programs: optimize linear forms over the copositive cone subject to linear constraints. Every quadratic program with linear constraints can be formulated as a copositive program, even if some of the variables are binary. So this is an NP-hard problem class. While most methods try to approximate the copositive cone from within, we propose a method which approximates this cone from outside. This is achieved by passing to the dual problem, where the feasible set is an affine subspace intersected with the cone of completely positive matrices, and this cone is approximated from within. We consider feasible descent directions in the completely positive cone, and regularized strictly convex subproblems. In essence, we replace the intractable completely positive cone with a nonnegative cone, at the cost of a series of nonconvex quadratic subproblems. Proper adjustment of the regularization parameter results in short steps for the nonconvex quadratic programs. This suggests to approximate their solution by standard linearization techniques. Preliminary numerical results on three different classes of test problems are quite promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berman A., Shaked-Monderer N.: Completely positive matrices. World Scientific, Singapore (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bomze I.M., Dür M., de Klerk E., Quist A., Roos C., Terlaky T.: On copositive programming and standard quadratic optimization problems. J. Glob. Optim. 18, 301–320 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bomze, I.M., Eichfelder, G.: Copositivity detection by difference-of-convex decomposition and omega-subdivision. Available at http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2010/01/2523.html (2010)

  4. Bomze I.M., Frommlet F., Locatelli M.: Gap, cosum, and product properties of the θ′ bound on the clique number. Optimization 59, 1041–1051 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bomze I.M., Jarre F.: A note on Burer’s copositive representation of mixed-binary QPs. Optim. Lett. 4, 465–472 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bundfuss S., Dür M.: Algorithmic Copositivity Detection by Simplicial Partition. Linear Algebra Appl. 428, 1511–1523 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bundfuss S., Dür M.: An Adaptive Linear Approximation Algorithm for Copositive Programs. SIAM J. Optim. 20, 30–53 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Burer S.: On the copositive representation of binary and continuous nonconvex quadratic programs. Math. Program. 120, 479–495 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. de Klerk E., Pasechnik D.V.: Approximation of the stability number of a graph via copositive programming. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 875–892 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickinson P.J.C.: An improved characterization of the interior of the completely positive cone. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 20, 723–729 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. DIMACS implementation challenges. Available at ftp://dimacs.rutgers.edu/pub/challenge/graph

  12. Dür M., Still G.: Interior points of the completely positive cone. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 17, 48–53 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dukanovic I., Rendl F.: Copositive programming motivated bounds on the stability and chromatic numbers. Math. Program. 121, 249–268 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson C.R., Reams R.: Constructing copositive matrices from interior matrices. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 17, 9–20 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Knuth D.E.: The sandwich theorem. Electron. J. Comb. 22, 1–48 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lovász L.: On the Shannon capacity of a graph. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT–25, 1–7 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McEliece R.J., Rodemich E.R., Rumsey H.C.: The Lovász’ bound and some generalizations. J. Comb. Inf. Syst. Sci. 3, 134–152 (1978)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nesterov Y., Nemirovski A.: Interior point polynomial algorithms in convex programming. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Parrilo, P.: Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, USA (2000)

  20. Povh J., Rendl F.: Copositive and semidefinite relaxations of the quadratic assignment problem. Discret. Optim. 6, 231–241 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Schrijver A.: A comparison of the Delsarte and Lovasz bounds. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT–25, 425–429 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Vandenbussche D., Nemhauser G.: A branch-and-cut algorithm for nonconvex quadratic programs with box constraints. Math. Program. 102, 559–575 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz Rendl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bomze, I.M., Jarre, F. & Rendl, F. Quadratic factorization heuristics for copositive programming. Math. Prog. Comp. 3, 37–57 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-011-0022-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-011-0022-z

Keywords

Navigation