Abstract
A group decision-making (GDM) process is a social cognition process, which is a sub-topic of cognitive computation. The normalization of attribute values plays an important role in multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) and GDM problems. However, this research finds that the existing normalization methods are not always reasonable for GDM problems. To solve the problem of attribute normalization in GDM systems, some new normalization models are developed in this paper. An integrative study contributes to cognitive MADM and GDM systems. In existing normalization models, there are some bounds, such as \(\text {Max}(u_{j}), \text {Min}(u_{j}),\sum (u_{j}),\text {and} \sqrt {\sum (u_{j})^{2}}\). They are limited to a single attribute vector uj. The bound of new normalization method proposed in this work is related to one or more attribute vectors, in which the attribute values are graded in the same measure system. These related attribute vectors may be distributed to all decision matrices graded by this decision system. That is, the new bound in developed normalization model is an uniform bound, which is related to a decision system. For example, this uniform bound can be written as one of \(\text {Max}(.), \text {Min}(.), \sum (.),\sqrt {\sum (.)^{2}}\). Some illustrative examples are provided. A practical application to the evaluation of software reliability is introduced in order to illustrate the feasibility and practicability of methods introduced in this paper. Some experimental and computational comparisons are provided. The results show that new normalization methods are feasibility and practicability, and they are superior to the classical normalization methods. This work has provided some new normalization models. These new methods can adapt to all decision problems, including MADM and GDM problems. Some important limitations and future research are introduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghajani Bazzazi A, Osanloo M, Karimi B. Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: Application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38(3):2550–2556.
Allaoui H, Guo Y, Choudhary A, Bloemhof J. Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach. Computers & Operations Research 2018;89:369–384.
Bahraminasab M, Jahan A. Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Materials & Design 2011;32(8-9):4471–4477.
Bahraminasab M, Sahari BB, Edwards KL, Farahmand F, Hong TS, Arumugam M, Jahan A. Multi-objective design optimization of functionally graded material for the femoral component of a total knee replacement. Materials & Design 2014;53(1):159–173.
Behzadian M, Khanmohammadi Otaghsara S, Yazdani M, Ignatius J. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39(7-8):13051–13069.
Dehghan-Manshadi B, Mahmudi H, Abedian A, Mahmudi R. A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Materials & Design 2007;28(1):8–15.
Dong Y, Liu Y, Liang H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E. Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 2018;75:154–164.
Dwivedi G, Srivastava RK, Srivastava SK. A generalised fuzzy TOPSIS with improved closeness coefficient. Expert Syst Appl 2018;96:185–195.
Farhadinia B. A multiple criteria decision making model with entropy weight in an interval-transformed hesitant fuzzy environment. Cognitive Computation 2017;9(4):513–525.
García-Cascales MS, Lamata MT. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Math Comput Model 2012;56 (5-6):123–132.
Hatami-Marbini A, Kangi F. An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran Stock Exchange. Appl Soft Comput 2017;52:1084–1097.
Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer; 1981.
Ivanov V, Reznik A, Succi G, Ivanov V, Reznik A, Succi G. Comparing the reliability of software systems: a case study on mobile operating systems. Inf Sci 2017;423:398–411.
Jafarian M, Ebrahim Vahdat S. A fuzzy multi-attribute approach to select the welding process at high pressure vessel manufacturing. J Manuf Process 2012;14(3):250–256.
Jahan A, Bahraminasab M, Edwards KL. A target-based normalization technique for materials selection. Materials & Design 2012;35:647–654.
Jahan A, Edwards KL. A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: improving the materials selection process in engineering design. Materials & Design 2015;65:335–342.
Jahan A, Edwards KL, Milani AS, Bahraminasab M. Multicriteria decision analysis in material design, selection, and manufacturing. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015;2015:261–270.
Jahan A, Mustapha F, Sapuan SM, Md YI, Bahraminasab M. A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012;58(1-4):411–420.
Kumar K, Prakash A, Tripathi R. Spectrum handoff scheme with multiple attributes decision making for optimal network selection in cognitive radio networks. Digital Communications and Networks 2017;3:164–175.
Lee H. Justifying database normalization: a cost/benefit model. Information Processing & Management 1995;31 (1):59–67.
Li J, Ng ST, Skitmore M. Developing a decision aid for selecting low-carbon refurbishment solutions for multi-story residential buildings in subtropical cities. Energy and Buildings 2018;158:1724–1735.
Li X, Chen X. D-intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Cognitive Computation 2018;10(3):496–505.
Liu P, Li H. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy power Bonferroni aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Cognitive Computation 2017;9(4):494–512.
Liu P, Liu J. Some q-rung orthopai fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 2018;33(2):315–347.
Liu P, Mahmood T, Khan Q. Group decision making based on power Heronian aggregation operators under linguistic neutrosophic environment. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 2018;20(3):970–985.
Liu P, Zhang X. A novel picture fuzzy linguistic aggregation operator and its application to group decision-making. Cognitive Computation 2018;10(2):242–259.
Liu SL, Qiu WH. Studies on the basic theories for MADM. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice 1998;18 (1):38–43.
Liu Z, Wang S, Liu P. Multiple attribute group decision making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy heronian mean operators. Int J Intell Syst 2018;33(12):2341–2363.
Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas EK. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications-two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst Appl 2015;42(8):4126–4148.
Milani AS, Shanian A, Madoliat R, Nemes JA. The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2005; 29(4):312–318.
Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B. Enhancing decision-making flexibility by introducing a new last aggregation evaluating approach based on multi-criteria group decision making and pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 2017;61:527–535.
Moore DS, Mccabe GP, Craig BA. Introduction to the practice of statistics, 6th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 2009.
Nayak SC, Misra BB, Behera HS. Impact of data normalization on stock index forecasting. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications 2014;6:257–269.
Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F. MENTOR: a graphical monitoring tool of preferences evolution in large-scale group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 2014;58:66–74.
Peng H, Wang J. Outranking decision-making method with Z-Number cognitive information. Cognitive Computation 2018;10(5):752–768.
Ren J. Technology selection for ballast water treatment by multi-stakeholders: a multi-attribute decision analysis approach based on the combined weights and extension theory. Chemosphere 2018;191:747–760.
Sarraf AZ, Mohaghar A, Bazargani H. Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 2013;6(4):860.
Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Lee ES. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math Comput Model 2007;45(7):801–813.
Tao Z, Han B, Chen H. On intuitionistic fuzzy Copula aggregation operators in multiple-attribute decision making. Cognitive Computation 2018;10(4):610–624.
Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK, Peldschus F. Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Inzinerine Ekonomika Engineering Economics 2009;1(61):7–17.
Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK, Peldschus F. 2015. Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Engineering economics, 61(1).
Walczak D, Rutkowska A. Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method. Eur J Oper Res 2017;260(2):706–714.
Wang YM, Luo Y. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 2010;51(1):1–12.
Xiong G, Lan J, Zhang H, Ding T-H. The effect of attribute normalization factors in attribute distance weighted average. Autom Control Comput Sci 2017;51(2):85–96.
Yazdani M. New approach to select materials using MADM tools. International Journal of Business & Systems Research 2018;10(2):25.
Yazdani M, Jahan A, Zavadskas EK. Analysis in material selection: Influence of normalization tools on Copras-G. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research 2017;51(1):59–74.
Yazdani M, Zarate P, Coulibaly A, Zavadskas EK. A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management. Expert Syst Appl 2017;88:376–392.
Yoon K, Hwang CL. 1995. Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage Publications, Inc.
Yu X, Xu Z, Chen Q. A method based on preference degrees for handling hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38(4):3147–3154.
Yue C. A geometric approach for ranking interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers with an application to group decision-making. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2016;102 :233–245.
Yue C. Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations. Appl Soft Comput 2017;60:737–749.
Yue C. Two normalized projection modfels and application to group decision-making. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 2017;32(6):4389–4402.
Yue C. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy projection-based approach and application to evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness. Neural Computing & Applications 2019;31(11):7685–706.
Yue C. Normalized projection approach to group decision-making with hybrid decision information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2018;9(8):1365– 1375.
Yue C. A novel approach to interval comparison and application to software quality evaluation. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2018;30(5):583–602.
Yue C. A projection-based approach to software quality evaluation from the users’ perspectives. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2019;10(9):2341–53.
Yue C. Normalization of attribute values with interval information in group decision-making setting: with an application to software quality evaluation. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2019;31(3): 475–492.
Yue ZL. A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Appl Math Model 2011;35(4):1926–1936.
Yue ZL. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers. Knowl-Based Syst 2011;24(1):146–153.
Yue ZL. An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making. Appl Math Model 2013;37(1-2): 112–126.
Yue ZL. Group decision making with multi-attribute interval data. Information Fusion 2013;14(4):551–561.
Yue ZL. An intuitionistic fuzzy projection-based approach for partner selection. Appl Math Model 2013;37(23): 9538–9551.
Yue ZL. TOPSIS-Based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Inf Sci 2014;277: 141– 153.
Yue ZL, Jia YY. An application of soft computing technique in group decision making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 2013;13(5):2490–2503.
Yue ZL, Jia YY. A group decision making model with hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2015;87:202–212.
Yue ZL, Jia YY. A direct projection-based group decision-making methodology with crisp values and interval data. Soft Comput 2017;21(9):2395–2405.
Zavadskas EK, Bausys R, Juodagalviene B, Garnyte-Sapranaviciene I. Model for residential house element and material selection by neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2017;64:315–324.
Zavadskas EK, Bausys R, Kaklauskas A, Ubarte I, Kuzminske A, Gudiene N. Sustainable market valuation of buildings by the single-valued neutrosophic MAMVA method. Appl Soft Comput 2017;57:74–87.
Zhu M, Pham H. Environmental factors analysis and comparison affecting software reliability in development of multi-release software. Journal of Systems & Software 2017;132:72–84.
Zyoud SH, Fuchs-Hanusch D. A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Syst Appl 2017;78:158–181.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions that have led to this improved version of the paper.
Funding
This study was funded by the Young Creative Talents Project from Department of Education of Guangdong Province (No. 2016KQNCX064), the Project of Enhancing School with Innovation of Guangdong Ocean University (No. GDOU2017052802), the Project of Professional Core Course from College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Guangdong Ocean University (No. 571119134), and the Project of Teaching Innovation in 2019 from Guangdong Ocean University (No. 570219088).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. Some related tables in the section “Comparison with Other Normalization Methods”
Appendix. Some related tables in the section “Comparison with Other Normalization Methods”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yue, C. Attribute Normalization Approaches to Group Decision-making and Application to Software Reliability Assessment. Cogn Comput 13, 139–163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-09707-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-09707-2