Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Neutrosophic VIKOR Method-Based Decision-Making with an Improved Distance Measure and Score Function: Case Study of Selection for Renewable Energy Alternatives

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a new score and distance function which provides more accurate results than the studies in the literature and considers the decision maker’s cognition has been proposed. In order to show the effects of the new score function coefficients on neutrosophic numbers, a new representation named “4D Plot” has been proposed. VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje which means multicriteria optimization and compromise solution in Serbian) method, which is based on the creation of a conciliatory solution within the framework of alternatives and evaluation criteria, provides highly effective results in multiple criteria decision-making problems. Neutrosophic numbers play an active role in facilitating the decision-making process in many studies. In this context, extension of the classical VIKOR method is introduced in detail in this study. The framework of the extended neutrosophic VIKOR method has been established. The proposed method has been applied to the renewable energy alternative selection problem in Turkey and compared with different methods and different scenarios. It has been shown that the proposed method gives more effective and accurate results. Furthermore, the sensitivity and accuracy of the study are enhanced by a sensitivity analysis. We have extended the classical VIKOR method for SVN numbers with a newly generalized score function and a distance measure. As a novel and newly presentation named “The 4D Plot” has been developed and applied in this paper to SVN numbers for presenting the effect of the new score function. The renewable energy alternative selection was made in Turkey with the proposed method by the opinions of the experts and the ranking of the alternatives was obtained. A sensitivity analysis has been made to show the accuracy and validity of the study. With the proposed distance measure and score function, it is shown that more accurate results can be found in multiple criteria decision-making problems. The model will provide solutions for many soft computing problems such as engineering and economy by finding more effective and accurate results in the neutrosophic number space according to the preference of decision makers. As a future work, the presented functions and framework can be adapted to different MCDM problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Didier D, Henry P. Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. New York, USA. Academic Press. 1980;144.

  2. Buckley JJ, Jowers LJ. Fuzzy sets. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput. 2008;222:9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986;20:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pouresmaeil H, Shivanian E, Khorram E, Fathabadi HS. An extended method using Topsis and Vikor for multiple attribute decision making with multiple decision makers and single valued neutrosophic numbers. Adv Appl Stat. 2017;50:261–92. Available from: http://www.pphmj.com/abstract/10640.htm.

  5. Smarandache F. Neutrosophic set - a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. 2006 IEEE Int Conf Granul Comput. 2010;38–42. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1635754/.

  6. Wang H, Smarandache F, Sunderraman R, Zhang Y-Q. Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multisp Multistruct. 2010;4:410–3.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Şahin R, Küçük A. Subsethood measure for single valued neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2015;29:525–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng JJ, Wang JQ, Wang J, Zhang HY, Chen XH. Simplified neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-criteria group decision-making problems. Int J Syst Sci. 2016;47:2342–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ye J. Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst. 2013;42:386–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandiok A, Chaturvedi DK. Machine learning techniques for cognitive decision making. 2015 IEEE Work Comput Intell Theor Appl Futur Dir. 2015;1–6. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7495529/.

  11. Zhang J, Yu J, Tao D. Local deep-feature alignment for unsupervised dimension reduction. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018;27:2420–32 Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8300630/.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu J, Zhu C, Zhang J, Huang Q, Tao D. Spatial pyramid-enhanced NetVLAD with weighted triplet loss for place recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst. 2020;31:661–74 Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8700608/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu J, Tan M, Zhang H, Tao D, Rui Y. Hierarchical deep click feature prediction for fine-grained image recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019;8828:1 Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8781933/.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hong C, Yu J, Zhang J, Jin X, Lee KH. Multimodal face-pose estimation with multitask manifold deep learning. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2019;15:3952–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu J, Tao D, Wang M, Rui Y. Learning to rank using user clicks and visual features for image retrieval. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015;45:767–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ieracitano C, Mammone N, Hussain A, Morabito FC. A novel multi-modal machine learning based approach for automatic classification of EEG recordings in dementia. Neural Netw. 2020;123:176–190. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0893608019303983.

  17. Vo NNY, He X, Liu S, Xu G. Deep learning for decision making and the optimization of socially responsible investments and portfolio. Decis Support Syst. Elsevier. 2019;124:113097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M. Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renew Energy. 2003;28:2063–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos DA, Munda G, Vreeker R. Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sour, Part B Econ Plan Policy. 2006;1:181–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaya T, Kahraman C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy. Elsevier. 2010;35:2517–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Çolak M, Kaya İ. Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: a real case application for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;80:840–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smarandache F. Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set, and logic. Rehoboth: American Research Press; 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Şahin R, Yigider M. A multi-criteria neutrosophic group decision making method based TOPSIS for supplier selection. Appl Math Inf Sci. 2016;10:1843–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aydoğdu A. On similarity and entropy of single valued neutrosophic sets. Gen Math Notes. 2015;29:67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ye J. Single-valued neutrosophic minimum spanning tree and its clustering method. J Intell Syst. 2014;23:311–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin J, Liu X, Pedrycz W. An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Syst. Elsevier B.V. 2015;86:116–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tzeng G, Huang J. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Dudley B. BP statistical review of world energy 2019. London, UK. Tech. rep., British Petroleum; 2019.

  29. Büyüközkan G, Karabulut Y, Güler M. Strategic renewable energy source selection for Turkey with hesitant fuzzy MCDM method. In: Kahraman C, Kayakutlu G, editors. Stud Syst Decis Control. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 229–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75690-5_11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Cengiz Toklu M, Taşkın H. A fuzzy hybrid decision model for renewable energy sources selection. Int J Comput Exp Sci Eng. 2018;4:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Büyüközkan G, Güleryüz S. An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. Int J Prod Econ. Elsevier. 2016;182:435–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aydın S, Aktas A, Kabak M. Neutrosophic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for safe cities evaluation criteria. Adv Intell Syst Comput. 2019;896:958–65.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu DS, Wei C, Wei GW. TODIM method for single-valued neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making. Information. 2017;8:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chi P, Liu P. An extended TOPSIS method for the multiple attribute decision making problems based on interval neutrosophic set. Neural Comput Appl. 2013;1:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ridvan Şahin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eroğlu, H., Şahin, R. A Neutrosophic VIKOR Method-Based Decision-Making with an Improved Distance Measure and Score Function: Case Study of Selection for Renewable Energy Alternatives. Cogn Comput 12, 1338–1355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09765-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09765-x

Keywords

Navigation