Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tri-Partition State Alphabet-Based Sequential Pattern for Multivariate Time Series

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the advancement of cognitive computing and three-way decisions has enabled in-depth sequential pattern understanding through temporal association analysis. The main challenge is to obtain concise patterns that express richer semantics for multivariate time series (MTS) analysis. In this paper, we propose a tri-partition state alphabet-based sequential pattern (Tri-SASP) for MTSs. First, a tri-wildcard gap inserted between each pair of adjacent states enhances the flexibility of the method. Second, a given set of states is partitioned into positive (POS), negative (NEG) and boundary (BND) regions. The states in POS can only be used to construct a Tri-SASP, the states in NEG can only be matched by a tri-wildcard gap, and the states in BND can be used in both ways. Finally, horizontal and vertical algorithms are proposed to obtain frequent Tri-SASPs in a breadth-first manner. The experimental results on four real-world datasets show that (1) the discovered Tri-SASPs and temporal rules can enrich human cognition; (2) the two tri-partition strategies can bring us very meaningful and varied Tri-SASPs; and (3) the two algorithms are effective and scalable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Air+Quality

  2. http://www.tipdm.org/bdrace/index.html

  3. http://www.cnooc.com.cn/en/

References

  1. Yang B, Li JH. Complex network analysis of three-way decision researches. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2020:973–87.

  2. Yao YY. Three-way decision: An interpretation of rules in rough set theory. In: International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. 2009:642–49.

  3. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci. 1982;11(5):341–56.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Campagner A, Cabitza F, Ciucci D. Three-way decision for handling uncertainty in machine learning: a narrative review. In: International Joint Conference on Rough Sets. Springer. 2020:137–52.

  5. Yao YY. Three-way decisions and cognitive computing. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(4):543–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao YY. The geometry of three-way decision. Appl Intell. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02142-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li JH, Huang CC, Qi JJ, Qian YH, Liu WQ. Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity. Inf Sci. 2017;378:244–63.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mao H, Zhao SF, Yang LZ. Relationships between three-way concepts and classical concepts. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2018;35(1):1063–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng XF, Yao YY. Decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets. Inf Sci. 2014;279:702–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Yao YY. Interval sets and three-way concept analysis in incomplete contexts. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2017;8(1):3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang Y, Min F. Cost-sensitive approximate attribute reduction with three-way decisions. Int J Approx Reason. 2019;104:148–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Min F, Liu FL, Wen LY, Zhang ZH. Tri-partition cost-sensitive active learning through knn. Soft Comput. 2019;23(5):1557–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ye X, Liu D. An interpretable sequential three-way recommendation based on collaborative topic regression. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;168:114454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang HR, Min F, Shi B. Regression-based three-way recommendation. Inf Sci. 2017;378:444–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Min F, Zhang SM, Ciucci D, Wang M. Three-way active learning through clustering selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2020;11(5):1033–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yue XD, Chen YF, Miao DQ, Qian J. Tri-partition neighborhood covering reduction for robust classification. Int J Approx Reason. 2016;83:371–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu H, Wang XC, Wang GY, Zeng XH. An active three-way clustering method via low-rank matrices for multi-view data. Inf Sci. 2020;507:823–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Min F, Zhang ZH, Zhai WJ, Shen RP. Frequent pattern discovery with tri-partition alphabets. Inf Sci. 2020;507(1):715–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Li HX, Zhang LB, Huang B, Zhou XZ. Sequential three-way decision and granulation for cost-sensitive face recognition. Knowl-Based Syst. 2016;91(C):241–51.

  20. Ren RS, Wei L. The attribute reductions of three-way concept lattices. Knowl-Based Syst. 2016;99:92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou B, Yao YY, Luo JG. Cost-sensitive three-way email spam filtering. J Intell Inf Syst. 2014;42(1):19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saira Q, Hasan M, Hammad M, Omer BM. Relationship identification between conversational agents using emotion analysis. Cogn Comput. 2021:1–15.

  23. Wang GY, Yu H. Multi-granularity cognitive computing-a new model for big data intelligent computing. Frontiers of Data and Domputing. 2020;1(2):75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Agrawal R, Srikant R. Mining sequential patterns. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering. 1995;95:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gan WS, Lin JCW, Fournier-Viger P, Chao HC, Yu PS. A survey of parallel sequential pattern mining. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data. 2019;13(3):1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakai H, Nakata M. Rough set-based rule generation and apriori-based rule generation from table data sets: a survey and a combination. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology. 2019;4(4):203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fournier-Viger P, Lin JCW, Kiran RU, Koh YS, Thomas R. A survey of sequential pattern mining. Data Science and Pattern Recognition. 2017;1(1):54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Srikant R, Agrawal R. Mining sequential patterns: Generalizations and performance improvements. In: International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Springer. 1996:1–17.

  29. Agrawal R, Srikant R. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th Very Large Data Bases Conference. 1994:487–99.

  30. Zaki MJ. Spade: An efficient algorithm for mining frequent sequences. Mach Learn. 2001;42(1):31–60.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayres J, Flannick J, Gehrke J, Yiu T. Sequential pattern mining using a bitmap representation. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2002:429–35.

  32. Yang ZL, Kitsuregawa M. Lapin-spam: An improved algorithm for mining sequential pattern. In: 21st International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops. 2005:1222–25.

  33. Pei J, Han JW, Mortazavi-Asl B, Wang JY, Pinto H, Chen QM, Dayal U, Hsu MC. Mining sequential patterns by pattern-growth: the prefixspan approach. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2004;16(11):1424–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zaki MJ. Scalable algorithms for association mining. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2000;12(3):372–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang JY, Han JW, Li C. Frequent closed sequence mining without candidate maintenance. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2007;19(8):1042–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luo CN, Chung SM. Efficient mining of maximal sequential patterns using multiple samples. In: SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. 2005:415–26.

  37. Lo D, Khoo SC, Li JY. Mining and ranking generators of sequential patterns. In: SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. 2008:553–64.

  38. Chang JH. Mining weighted sequential patterns in a sequence database with a time-interval weight. Knowl-Based Syst. 2011;24(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lan GC, Hong TP, Tseng VS, Wang SL. Applying the maximum utility measure in high utility sequential pattern mining. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41(11):5071–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Muzammal M, Raman R. Mining sequential patterns from probabilistic databases. Knowl Inf Syst. 2015;44(2):325–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fiot C, Laurent A, Teisseire M. From crispness to fuzziness: Three algorithms for soft sequential pattern mining. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2007;15(6):1263–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhuang DEH, Li GCL, Wong AK. Discovery of temporal associations in multivariate time series. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2014;26(12):2969–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tatavarty G, Bhatnagar R, Young B. Discovery of temporal dependencies between frequent patterns in multivariate time series. In: Computational Intelligence and Data Mining. IEEE Symposium on. 2007:688–96.

  44. Zhang ZH, Min F. Frequent state transition patterns of multivariate time series. IEEE Access. 2019;7:142934–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Segura-Delgado A, Gacto MJ, Alcalá R, Alcalá-Fdez J. Temporal association rule mining: An overview considering the time variable as an integral or implied component. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2020;10(4):e1367.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wu YX, Tong Y, Zhu XQ, Wu XD. Nosep: Nonoverlapping sequence pattern mining with gap constraints. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2017;48(10):2809–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu XD, Zhu XQ, He Y, Arslan AN. Pmbc: Pattern mining from biological sequences with wildcard constraints. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43(5):481–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Min F, Wu YX, Wu XD. The apriori property of sequence pattern mining with wildcard gaps. International Journal of Functional Informatics and Personalised Medicine. 2012;4(1):15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yao YY, Wong SK. A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1992;37(6):793–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ziarko W. Variable precision rough set model. J Comput Syst Sci. 1993;46(1):39–59.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Sang BB, Guo YT, Shi DR, Xu WH. Decision-theoretic rough set model of multi-source decision systems. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2017:1–14.

  52. Hu BQ. Three-way decisions space and three-way decisions. Inf Sci. 2014;281(281):21–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Li XN, Yi HJ, She YH, Sun BZ. Generalized three-way decision models based on subset evaluation. Int J Approx Reason. 2017;83(C):142–59.

  54. Liu D, Liang DC, Wang CC. A novel three-way decision model based on incomplete information system. Knowl-Based Syst. 2016;91:32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu WH, Li MM, Wang XZ. Information fusion based on information entropy in fuzzy multi-source incomplete information system. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2017;19(4):1200–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang M, Min F, Zhang ZH, Wu YX. Active learning through density clustering. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;85:305–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun L, Zhang XY, Qian YH, Xu JC, Zhang SG, Tian Y. Joint neighborhood entropy-based gene selection method with fisher score for tumor classification. Appl Intell. 2019;49(4):1245–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang CZ, Huang Y, Shao MW, Hu QH, Chen DG. Feature selection based on neighborhood self-information. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2019;50(9):4031–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tan CD, Min F, Wang M, Zhang HR, Zhang ZH. Discovering patterns with weak-wildcard gaps. IEEE Access. 2016;4:4922–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 41604114, 62006200); the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (grant numbers 2019YFG0216, 2020YFG0307); the Scientific Research and Innovation Team of Sichuan Tourism University (grant number 18SCTUTD06); and the Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Tourism University (grant number 2020SCTU14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fan Min.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, ZH., Min, F., Chen, GS. et al. Tri-Partition State Alphabet-Based Sequential Pattern for Multivariate Time Series. Cogn Comput 14, 1881–1899 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09871-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09871-4

Keywords

Navigation