Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of metaphors on information visualization

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metaphor is the underlying mechanism of information communication. Although metaphors are ubiquitous in information visualization designs, different connotations influence users’ information processing differently. Visual metaphors, however, may imply interfering attributes possibly caused by the source concepts, and lead to backfire effects on users’ inferences. Understanding the pros and cons of metaphoric transfer effect in information visualization would help optimize visualization designs, and improve efficiency and accuracy of information processing. This paper empirically examines how metaphors influence different activities of information processing, including comprehension, inference and judgment in information visualization. Metaphors illustrating clear semantic meanings in the source domain can improve both the user’s conceptual fluency in information comprehension, and the rate of correct information search.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams FM, Osgood CE (1973) A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. J Cross Cult Psychol 4(2):135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 13(3):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr P, Khaled R, Noble J, Biddle R (2005) A taxonomic analysis of user-interface metaphors in the Microsoft office project gallery, Australasian User Interface Conference, (Newcastle, Australia, 2005, January/February), pp 109–117

  • Barthers R (1977) Image music text. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Belke B, Leder H, Strobach T (2010) Cognitive fluency: high-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 4(4):214–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgo RK, Chung DHS, Maguire E, Laramee RS, Hauer H, Ward M, Chen M (2013) Glyph-based visualization: foundations, design guidelines, techniques and applications. In: The 34th Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Graphics, Girona, Spain, 6–10 May 2013 doi:  10.2312/conf/EG2013/stars/039-063

  • Cai Z, Li YN, Zheng XS, Zhang K (2015) Applying feature integration theory to glyph-based information visualization. In: The 8th IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium 2015, Hangzhou, China, 15–17 April 2015

  • Cantor N, Mischel W (1979) Prototypes in Person Perception. Advances experimental soc psychol 12:3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card S, Mack R, Kellog W (1988) Interface metaphors and user interface design. In: Hellander M (ed) Handbook of human computer interaction. Elsevier Science Publisher, North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayli M, Cobanoglu MC, Balcisoy S (2013) GlyphLink: an interactive visualization approach for semantic graphs. J Vis Lang Comput 24:463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cybulski JL, Keller S, Saundage D (2014) Metaphors in interactive visual analytics. In: Proceedings of The 2014 Visual Information Communication International Symposium , (Sydney, Australia, 5–8 August, 2014), VINCI’14, ACM, pp 212–215

  • Ditto PH, Lopez DF (1992) Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:568–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich EH (1960) Art and illusion: a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Havre Susan, Hetzler Elizabeth, Whitney Paul, Nowell Lucy (2002) ThemeRiver: visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 8(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heukelman D, Obono SE (2009) Exploring the African Village Metaphor for computer user interface icons. In: proceedings of the 2009 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists, Vaal River, South Africa, October 13-14, SAICSIT ‘09, ACM, New York, pp 132–140. doi:10.1145/1632149.1632167

  • Howell M, Love S, Turner M (2005) Spatial metaphors for a speech-based mobile city guide service. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 9(1):32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff D (1954) How to lie with statistics. WW Norton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya B (2007) Rationality and reasoning with metaphors. New Ideas Psychol 25:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M (1987) The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley CM, Lindsay DS (1993) Remembering mistaken for knowing: ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. J Mem Lang 32:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A (1993) How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychol Rev 100:609–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (1992) The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: Ortony Andrew (ed) Metaphor and though, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnsen M (2003) Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landau MJ, Meier BP, Keefer LA (2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychol Bull 136(6):1045–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei ST, Zhang K (2011) Visual signatures for financial time series. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Visual Information Communication International Symposium. Article 16, (Hong Kong, China, 4–5 Aug, 2011), VINCI’11, ACM

  • Li Y-N, Li D-J, Zhang K (2015) Metaphoric transfer effect in information visualization using glyph. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction, VINCI15, 24–26 August, Tokyo, Japan, ACM, pp 121–130

  • Lin S, Fortuna J, Kulkarni C, Stone M, Heer J (2013) Selecting semantically-resonant colors for data visualization, In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Graphics. Girona, Spain, May 6–10, Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis), vol. 32, No. 3

  • Mamassian P (2008) Ambiguities and conventions in the perception of visual art. Vision Res 48(20):2143–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli GN, Scopelliti I, Donato C (2014) Breaking through complexity: visual and conceptual dimensions in logo evaluation across exposures. Psychol Mark 31(10):886–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MW, Sheldon OJ, Ames DR, Young MJ (2007) Metaphors and the market: consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 102:174–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen QV, Zhang K, Simoff S (2015) Unlocking the complexity of port data with visualization. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 45(2):272–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey AV, Manivannan A, Nov O, Satterthwaite ML, Bertini E (2013) The Persuasive Power of Data Visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346419

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raja F, Hawkey K, Hsu S, Wang KLC, Beznosov K (2011) A Brick Wall, a Locked Door, and a Bandit: a Physical Security Metaphor for Firewall Warnings, Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (Pittsburgh, PA. July 20-22, 2011). SOUPS ‘11, ACM 

  • Reber R, Schwarz N (1999) Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Conscious Cogn 8:338–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropinski T, Oeltze S, Preim B (2011) Survey of glyph-based visualization techniques for spatial multivariate medical data. Comput Graphics 35:392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Sanna LJ, Skurnik I, Yoon C (2007) Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 39:127–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Schwarz N (2010) If it’s easy to read, it’s easy to do, pretty, good, and true. The Psychologist 23(2):108–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman P, Schwarz N, Fazendeiro T, Reber R (2003) The Hedonic Marking of Processing Fluency: Implications for Evaluative Judgment. In: Musch J, Klauer KC (eds) The psychology of evaluation: affective processes in cognition and emotion. Erlbaum Inc, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemkiewicz C, Kosara R (2008) The shaping of information by visual metaphors. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 14(6):1269–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (61572348), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M561178, 2014M551017) and International postdoctoral exchange fellowship (No. 20150046). The authors would like to thank Zhuang Cai for his generation of visualization images used in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, People’s Republic of China

    Yi-Na Li & Dong-Jin Li

  2. Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080-3021, USA

    Kang Zhang

Authors
  1. Yi-Na Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dong-Jin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Jin Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, YN., Li, DJ. & Zhang, K. The impact of metaphors on information visualization. J Vis 20, 487–504 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0371-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0371-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation