Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drag-reducing underbody flow of a heavy vehicle with side skirts

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aerodynamic drag reduction in heavy vehicles is a very interesting research topic that is relevant for both the industries and the environment. The underbody flow induces considerable drag as it passes through the underside of heavy vehicles and interacts with rolling wheels and other underbody structures. Nonetheless, the drag caused by such an underbody flow has received less research attention, compared with those attributed to forebody and base body flows. Side skirts are one of the most effective drag-reduction devices to control the underbody flow. They consist of straight panels curtaining the space between the front and rear wheels. However, the mechanisms of underbody flow modified by side skirts have yet to be fully understood. In this study, the drag reduction underbody flow of a scaled-down 15-ton truck model attached with two different types of side skirts was quantitatively visualized through wind tunnel tests. Results show that the straight-type side skirt and the flap-type side skirt significantly change the flow structures under the vehicle model, reducing drag coefficient by 3.1 and 6.1 %, respectively. Furthermore, flow characteristics in the underbody of the vehicle model with and without side skirts are investigated using a PIV technique to understand the associated drag-reduction mechanism.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S, Ramm G, Faltin G (1984) Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE technical paper, no. 840300

  • Ahmed S, Gawthorpe R, Mackrodt PA (1985) Aerodynamics of road-and rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 14:319–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Lee J, Park H (2014) Aerodynamics of heavy vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:441–468

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper KR (2003) Truck aerodynamics reborn-lessons from the past. SAE Trans 112:132–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper KR, Leuschen J (2005) Model and full-scale wind tunnel tests of second-generation aerodynamic fuel saving devices for tractor-trailers. SAE technical paper, no. 2005-01-3512

  • Gerrard J (1966) The mechanics of the formation region of vortices behind bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 25:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han T, Sumantran V, Harris C, Kuzmanov T, Huebler M, Zak T (1996) Flow-field simulations of three simplified vehicle shapes and comparisons with experimental measurements. SAE Trans 106:820–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucho WH, Sovran G (1993) Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25:485–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Lee S, Lee EJ, Kim JJ, Kim M, You D, Lee SJ (2016) Reduction of drag in heavy vehicles with two different types of advanced side skirts. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 155:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia S, Roy S, Vallero M, Wurtzler K, Forsythe J (2004) Detached-eddy simulation over a reference Ahmed car model. In: Direct and large-eddy simulation V, pp 481–488

  • Krajnović S, Davidson L (2005) Influence of floor motions in wind tunnels on the aerodynamics of road vehicles. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93:677–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega JM, Salari K (2004) An experimental study of drag reduction devices for a trailer underbody and base. AIAA paper, no. 2004-2252

  • Storms BL, Satran DR, Heineck JT, Walker S (2004) A study of reynolds number effects and drag-reduction concepts on a generic tractor-trailer. AIAA paper, no. 2004-2251

  • Strachan R, Knowles K, Lawson N (2007) The vortex structure behind an Ahmed reference model in the presence of a moving ground plane. Exp Fluids 42:659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verzicco R, Fatica M, Iaccarino G, Moin P, Khalighi B (2002) Large eddy simulation of a road vehicle with drag-reduction devices. AIAA J. 40:2447–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vino G, Watkins S, Mousley P, Watmuff J, Prasad S (2005) Flow structures in the near-wake of the Ahmed model. J Fluids Struct 20:673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West G, Apelt C (1982) The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105. J Fluid Mech 114:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RM (2006) A discussion of a heavy truck advanced aerodynamic trailer system. In: 9th international symposium on heavy vehicle weights dimensions, University Park, PA, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as the second year research of the development of aerodynamic technologies for efficient road freight transport, supported by the KAIA in the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (NTIS 1615007940).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Joon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.J., Lee, S.J. Drag-reducing underbody flow of a heavy vehicle with side skirts. J Vis 20, 369–378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0401-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0401-7

Keywords

Navigation