Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Best practices for the publication of Semantic Web data currently place an unacceptably high burden on the end-user, who is supposed to locate and embrace third-party, ontological structures prior to publishing any information. This paper argues for a different publication paradigm where end-users are encouraged to publish potentially incomplete or conflicting information according to their own local context, and where heterogeneous data is consolidated a posteriori through bottom–up, decentralized processes. This approach has two key advantages: first, it greatly simplifies the publication of semantic information by allowing users to contribute purely local data, without any consideration for global schemas or third-party structures. Second, it takes advantage of expressive, semantic links to relate both schemas and instances, creating complex webs of knowledge where cultural or social differences can flourish and be confronted one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. See for instance the SUMO http://www.ontologyportal.org/ or DOLCE http://www.loa.istc.cnr.it/DOLCE.html ontologies

  2. Such as http://www.geneontology.org/

References

  • Aberer K, Cudré-Mauroux P, Hauswirth M (2002) A framework for semantic gossiping. SIGOMD RECORD 31(4)

  • Aberer K, Cudré-Mauroux P, Hauswirth M (2003) The chatty web: emergent semantics through gossiping. In: International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), pp 197–206

  • Berners-Lee T, Fielding R, Masinter L (2005) Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): generic syntax. IETF RFC 3986, January

  • Bouquet P et al. (2004) Specification of a common framework for characterizing alignment. KnowledgeWeb Deliverable 2.2.1

  • Brickley D, Miller L (2010) FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98, August 2010. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/

  • Celic T, Mullenweg M, Meyer E (2003) Xhtml friends network relationships meta data profile 1.1, 2003. http://gmpg.org/xfn/11

  • Cudré-Mauroux P (2008) Emergent semantics: interoperability for large-scale decentralized information systems. EPFL Press and CRC, Boca Raton

  • Cudré-Mauroux P (2009a) Emergent semantics. In: Özsu TM and Liu L (eds) Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, New York

  • Cudré-Mauroux P (2009b) Peer Data Management System. In: T. M. Özsu and L. Liu, (eds), Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, New York

  • Cudré-Mauroux P, Aberer K (2004) A necessary condition for semantic interoperability in the large. In: Ontologies, DataBases, and Applications of Semantics for Large Scale Information Systems (ODBASE), Springer, New York

  • Cudré-Mauroux P, Aberer K, Feher A (2006) Probabilistic message passing in peer data management systems. In: International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)

  • Cudré-Mauroux P, Suchit Agarwal, Karl Aberer (2007) Gridvine: an infrastructure for peer information management. IEEE Internet Computing 11(5):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudré-Mauroux P, Haghani P, Jost M, Aberer K, de Meer H (2009) idMesh: graph-based disambiguation of linked data. In: International World Wide Web Conference (WWW)

  • Euzenat J, Shvaiko P (2007) Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (DE)

  • Euzenat et al. J (2004) State of the art on current alignment techniques. KnowledgeWeb Deliverable 2.2.3. http://knowledgeweb.semanticweb.org

  • Herschel S, Heese R, Bleiholder J, Czekay C (2006) An architecture for emergent semantics. J Data Semant 11:213–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Koudas N, Srivastava D (2005) Approximate joins: concepts and techniques. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB)

  • Nick Koudas, Sunita Sarawagi, Divesh Srivastava (2006) Record linkage: similarity measures and algorithms. In: ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data

  • Kschischang FR, Frey BJ, Loeliger H-A (2001) Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Transac Inf Theory 47(2):498–519

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness DL, van Harmelen F (eds) (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.

  • Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo

  • Rapaport (WJ) (1988) Syntactic semantics: foundations of computational natural-language understanding. In: Aspects of artificial intelligence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 81–131

  • Rapaport WJ (2003) What did you mean by that? Misunderstanding, negotiation, and syntactic semantics. Minds Mach 13(3):397–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steels L (2006) Semiotic dynamics for embodied agents. IEEE Intell Syst 21(3):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederhold G (1992) Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Comput 25(3):38–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Number PP00P2_128459).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Cudré-Mauroux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cudré-Mauroux, P. Loose ontological coupling and the Social Semantic Web. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 4, 349–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-012-0108-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-012-0108-0

Keywords

Navigation