Abstract
Consider the decision faced by the user of a social network site (SNS) regarding whether or not to accept a friendship request from another user. The user making such a decision is constrained by the limited amount of information available about the requester. Therefore, the decision must be based on incomplete information about the main characteristics and preferences describing the requester. We formalize this decision problem by defining the expected utility tradeoffs derived from the request and simulate the resulting acceptance and rejection incentives numerically. These incentives provide the basis on which to build inclusive and exclusive social networks determined by the different expectations and preferences of their users. Social networks are generated using a self-organizing map to cluster the decision makers (DMs) by their friendship acceptance behavior. We analyze the effects on the cluster structure of the resulting social network that follow from modifying the distribution of requesters relative to the preferences of the DMs, the disutility derived from accepting the friendship of an unwanted requester, the costs incurred when searching for potential friends to expand the network of connections, and the minimum networking capacities of the friendship requesters demanded by the DMs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell L, Brewer G (2014) Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 36:258–262
Adamic LA, Adar E (2003) Friends and neighbors on the web. Soc Netw 25:211–230
Atif Y, Mathew SS, Lakas A (2015) Building a smart campus to support ubiquitous learning. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 6:223–238
Błachnio A, Przepiórka A, Rudnicka P (2013) Psychological determinants of using Facebook: a research review. Int J Human Computer Interact 29:775–787
Błachnio A, Przepiorka A, Boruch W, Bałakier E (2016) Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people. Personal Individ Differ 94:26–31
Buzzanca M, Carchiolo V, Longheu A, Malgeri M, Mangioni G (2016) Direct trust assignment using social reputation and aging. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. doi:10.1007/s12652-016-0413-0
Choi G, Chung H (2013) Applying the technology acceptance model to social networking sites (SNS): impact of subjective norm and social capital on the acceptance of SNS. Int J Human Computer Interact 29:619–628
Giannakos MN, Chorianopoulos K, Giotopoulos K, Vlamos P (2013) Using Facebook out of habit. Behav Inf Technol 32:594–602
Guo H, Pathak P, Cheng HK (2015) Estimating social influences from social networking sites—articulated friendships versus communication interactions. Decis Sci 46:135–163
Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BCF (2013) Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inf Syst Res 24:579–595
Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kaptein MC, Markopoulos P, de Ruyter B, Aarts E (2010) Persuasion in ambient intelligence. J Ambient Intell Humaniz 1:43–56
Klein A, Ahlf H, Sharma V (2015) Social activity and structural centrality in online social networks. Telematics Inform 32:321–332
Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer series in information sciences, vol 30, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
Krasnova H, Veltri NF, Günther O (2012) Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: the role of culture. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4:127–135
Lee H, Park H, Kim J (2013) Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users’ behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. Int J Hum Comput Stud 71:862–877
Marey O, Bentahar J, Khosrowshahi-Asl E, Sultan K, Dssouli R (2015) Decision making under subjective uncertainty in argumentation-based agent negotiation. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 6:307–323
Nadkarni A, Hofmann SG (2012) Why do people use Facebook? Personal Individ Differ 52:243–249
Oldmeadow JA, Quinn S, Kowert R (2013) Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Comput Hum Behav 29:1142–1149
Qin L, Kim Y, Hsu J, Tan X (2011) The effects of social influence on user acceptance of online social networks. Int J Hum Comput Intera 27:885–899
Samiee S, Shimp TA, Sharma S (2005) Brand origin recognition accuracy: its antecedents and consumers’ cognitive limitations. J Int Bus Stud 36:379–397
Simon HA (1997) Administrative behaviour. Free Press, New York
Stefanone MA, Hurley CM, Egnoto MJ, Covert JM (2015) Information asymmetry and social exchange: exploring compliance gaining online. Inf Commun Soc 18:376–389
Sulkava M, Sepponen AM, Yli-Heikkilä M, Latukka A (2015) Clustering of the self-organizing map reveals profiles of farm profitability and upscaling weights. Neurocomputing 147:197–206
Tavana M, Di Caprio D, Santos-Arteaga FJ (2016a) Modeling sequential information acquisition behavior in rational decision making. Decis Sci 47:720–761
Tavana M, Di Caprio D, Santos-Arteaga FJ, Tierney K (2016b) Modeling signal-based decisions in online search environments: a non-recursive forward-looking approach. Inf Manag 53:207–226
Tavana M, Di Caprio D, Santos-Arteaga FJ (2016c) Loyal customer bases as innovation disincentives for duopolistic firms using strategic signaling and Bayesian analysis. Ann Oper Res 244:647–676
Tosun LP (2012) Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the Internet. Comput Hum Behav 28:1510–1517
Trepte S, Dienlin T, Reinecke L (2015) Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: a longitudinal study. Media Psychol 18:74–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Caprio, D., Santos-Arteaga, F.J. & Tavana, M. The emergence of inclusive and exclusive virtual communities determined by the preferences of their users. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 8, 315–328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0447-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0447-y