Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An energy-aware multi-sensor geo-fog paradigm for mission critical applications

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sensor cloud is an integral component for smart computing infrastructure. Cloud servers are largely used to store and process sensor data. For mission critical applications use of only wireless sensor network results in provisioning of service in a small area and the use of a long distant remote cloud servers increase delay that degrades the Quality of Service. Further, geospatial information differs over regions. Thus storing and processing the data of all regions inside the cloud data centres may not be efficient with respect to response time (latency), energy consumption etc., which are crucial factors for mission critical applications. To overcome these limitations, we propose multi-sensor geo-fog paradigm. We consider defense sector in our work as mission critical application. For energy optimized services with minimal delay fog computing has been used, where the intermediate devices process the data. The proposed paradigm will offer fast and energy-efficient processing of defense related sensor and geospatial data. A mathematical model of the paradigm is developed. The sensor and geospatial data processing and analysis take place inside the fog device. If abnormality is detected in the data or emergency situation occurs, then shortest path to the victim region is determined using intelligent K* heuristic search algorithm. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed fog based network scenario reduces energy consumption, average jitter and average delay by 12–15%, 10–14% and 9–11% respectively than the cloud based network. The simulation results demonstrate that saving about 20% of resources increases the performance for priority user whereas the resource availability for the normal users is not compromised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Amin MB, Hussain S et al (2016) Health Fog: a novel framework for health and wellness applications. J Supercomput 72(10):3677–3695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljazzar H, Leue S (2011) K*: a heuristic search algorithm for finding the k shortest paths. Artif Intell 175(18):2129–2154

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alowolodu OD, Alese BK, Adetunmbi AO et al (2013) Elliptic curve cryptography for securing cloud computing applications. Int J Comput Appl 66(23):10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H, Manguoglu M (2018) A parallel bio-inspired shortest path algorithm. Computing 101:969–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barik RK, Dubey H, Mankodiya K, Sasane SA, Misra C (2019) GeoFog4Health: a fog-based SDI framework for geospatial health big data analysis. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10(2):551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmaoglu S, Saritas O, Yalcin H (2019) Defense 4.0: Internet of Things in military. In: Emerging technologies for economic development. Springer, Cham, pp 303–320

  • Chi Y, Moon HJ, Hacigümüş H et al (2011) SLA-tree: a framework for efficiently supporting SLA-based decisions in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on extending database technology. ACM, pp 129–140

  • Chiang M, Zhang T (2016) Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J 3(6):854–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das J, Dasgupta A, Ghosh SK et al (2019) A learning technique for VM allocation to resolve geospatial queries. In: Recent findings in intelligent computing techniques. Springer, Singapore, pp 577–584

  • Dastjerdi AV, Buyya R (2016) Fog computing: helping the Internet of Things realize its potential. Computer 49(8):112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Paola A, Ferraro P, Re GL, Morana M, Ortolani M (2019) A fog-based hybrid intelligent system for energy saving in smart buildings. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01375-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan M, Subramaniyaswamy V, Vijayakumar V, Ravi L (2019) Fog-assisted personalized healthcare-support system for remote patients with diabetes. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01291-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gai K, Qiu M, Zhao H et al (2016) Dynamic energy-aware cloudlet-based mobile cloud computing model for green computing. J Netw Comput Appl 59:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero C, Lera I, Juiz C (2019) A lightweight decentralized service placement policy for performance optimization in fog computing. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10(6):2435–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Dastjerdi AV, Ghosh SK et al (2017) iFogSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the Internet of Things, Edge and Fog computing environments. Softw Pract Exp 47(9):1275–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Li G, Wu J et al (2016) Software-defined QoS provisioning for fog computing advanced wireless sensor networks. In: SENSORS, 2016 IEEE. IEEE, pp 1–3

  • Kertesz A, Pflanzner T, Gyimothy T (2018) A mobile IoT device simulator for IoT-Fog-Cloud systems. J Grid Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-018-9468-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari A, Tanwar S, Tyagi S et al (2018) Fog computing for Healthcare 4.0 environment: opportunities and challenges. Comput Electr Eng 72:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limkar SV, Jha RK (2018) A novel method for parallel indexing of real time geospatial big data generated By IoT devices. Future Gener Comput Syst 97:433–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin K, Xia F, Li C et al (2019) Emotion-aware system design for the battlefield environment. Inf Fusion 47:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan TH, Gao L, Li Z et al (2015) Fog computing: Focusing on mobile users at the edge. arXiv:1502.01815

  • MacEachren AM, Robinson A, Hopper S et al (2005) Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: what we know and what we need to know. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 32(3):139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madria S, Kumar V, Dalvi R (2014) Sensor cloud: a cloud of virtual sensors. IEEE Softw 31(2):70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer U, Sanders P (2003) Δ-stepping: a parallelizable shortest path algorithm. J Algorithms 49(1):114–152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Michail HE, Kakarountas AP, Milidonis A et al (2004) Efficient implementation of the keyed-hash message authentication code (HMAC) using the SHA-1 hash function. In: Proceedings of the 2004 11th IEEE international conference on electronics, circuits and systems, 2004. ICECS 2004. IEEE, pp 567–570

  • Misra S, Singh A, Chatterjee S et al (2016) Mils-cloud: a sensor-cloud-based architecture for the integration of military tri-services operations and decision making. IEEE Syst J 10(2):628–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra S, Chatterjee S, Obaidat MS (2017) On theoretical modeling of sensor cloud: a paradigm shift from wireless sensor network. IEEE Syst J 11(2):1084–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mnassri B, Ananou B, Ouladsine M (2009) Fault detection and diagnosis based on PCA and a new contribution plot. IFAC Proc Vol 42:834–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, De D, Roy DG (2016) A power and latency aware cloudlet selection strategy for multi-cloudlet environment. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 7(1):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Deb P, De D et al (2018) C2OF2N: a low power cooperative code offloading method for femtolet-based fog network. J Supercomput 74(6):2412–2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutlag AA, Ghani MKA, Arunkumar N et al (2019) Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Future Gener Comput Syst 90:62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naito Y, Wang L (2016) Replacing SHA-2 with SHA-3 enhances generic security of HMAC. In: Cryptographers’ track at the RSA conference. Springer, Cham, pp 397–412

  • Rahmani AM, Gia TN, Negash B et al (2018) Exploiting smart e-Health gateways at the edge of healthcare Internet-of-Things: a fog computing approach. Future Gener Comput Syst 78:641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy M (2019) Design and implementation of cognitive radio sensor network for emergency communication using discrete wavelet packet transform technique. In: International conference on distributed computing and internet technology. Springer, Cham, pp 270–278

  • Ravilla D, Putta CSR (2015) Implementation of HMAC-SHA256 algorithm for hybrid routing protocols in MANETs. In: 2015 International conference on electronic design, computer networks and automated verification (EDCAV). IEEE, pp 154-159

  • Satyanarayanan M, Bahl V, Caceres R, Davies N (2009) The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 8(4):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalable Network Technologies (2018) QualNet - Network Simulation. https://www.scalable-networks.com/qualnet-network-simulation. Accessed Feb 2019

  • Sen A, Madria S (2017) Risk assessment in a sensor cloud framework using attack graphs. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 10(6):942–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark E, Hamburg M, Boneh D (2009) Symmetric cryptography in javascript. In: Computer security applications conference, pp 373–381

  • Venticinque S, Amato A (2019) A methodology for deployment of IoT application in fog. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10(5):1955–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SL, Chen YL, Kuo AMH et al (2016) Design and evaluation of a cloud-based Mobile Health Information Recommendation system on wireless sensor networks. Comput Electr Eng 49:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y, Balasubramanian B, Wang M et al (2013) Self-adaptive, deadline-aware resource control in cloud computing. In: 2013 IEEE 7th international conference on self-adaptation and self-organizing systems workshops (SASOW). IEEE, pp 41–46

  • Xie YX, Chen X G, Zhao J (2011) Data fault detection for wireless sensor networks using multi-scale PCA method. In: 2011 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence, management science and electronic commerce (AIMSEC). IEEE, pp 7035–7038

  • Yan L, Rong C, Zhao G (2009) Strengthen cloud computing security with federal identity management using hierarchical identity-based cryptography. In: IEEE international conference on cloud computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–177

  • Yaqoob S, Ullah A, Akbar M, Imran M, Shoaib M (2019) Congestion avoidance through fog computing in internet of vehicles. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01253-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Cheng L, Boutaba R (2010) Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges. J Internet Serv Appl 1(1):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Zhou M, Fortino G (2018) Security and trust issues in Fog computing: a survey. Future Gener Comput Syst 88:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Leung VC, Wang K et al (2017) Multi-method data delivery for green sensor-cloud. IEEE Commun Mag 55(5):176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is partially supported by TEQIP-III, MAKAUT, West Bengal and Department of Science and Technology, Government of India through research project under Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, and Melbourne-Chindia Cloud Computing (MC3) Research Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Mobile Cloud Computing, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, West Bengal, B.F.-142, Salt Lake, Sector-1, Kolkata, 700064, India

    Moumita Mishra, Sayan Kumar Roy & Debashis De

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India

    Anwesha Mukherjee & Soumya K. Ghosh

  3. Department of Physics, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Debashis De

  4. Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems (CLOUDS) Laboratory, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Rajkumar Buyya

Authors
  1. Moumita Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sayan Kumar Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anwesha Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Debashis De
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Soumya K. Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rajkumar Buyya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debashis De.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, M., Roy, S.K., Mukherjee, A. et al. An energy-aware multi-sensor geo-fog paradigm for mission critical applications. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11, 3155–3173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01481-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01481-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation