Skip to main content
Log in

Towards effective business process availability management

  • Published:
Journal of Service Science Research

Abstract

We present a decision-support framework for managing business process unavailability caused by the planned maintenance activities of the underlying infrastructure components such as software and hardware upgrades and patch application. The framework has two parts: the first part provides an approach for estimating the business impact of business process outages. Four business impact factors are defined, involving both quantitative and qualitative metrics. Total business impact involves combining the individual impacts on business for various countries affected by the outages within a company. We apply multi-attribute utility theory to combine the values of impact factors. In the second part, optimal schedules for process maintenance activities are computed to minimize the overall estimated business impact using a sliding-window based scheduling algorithm. Finally, the schedules and their business impact are presented to the decision maker in a visual environment that is conducive for effective decision making. A prototype of the system has been developed and is currently being evaluated for use in a large Dow Jones (Top 10) company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benatallah B, Sheng QZ, & Dumas M (2003) The Self-service environment for web services composition. IEEE Internet Computing 7(1):40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buede D, Downey E (1986) Structuring value attributes. Interfaces 16(2):52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Impact Analysis: Business Continuity Planning (BCP) and Disaster Recovery Planning (DRP) http://www.giac.org/resources/whitepaper/planning/122.php

  • Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1982) Relative risk aversion. Management Science 28(8):875–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer J, Edmunds T, Butler J, & Jia J (1998) A multi-attribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Operations Research 46(6): 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga DJ, Horak T, Lee C-Y, & Bruner C (1995) Business process management: Survey and methodology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42(2):119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiles A (2008) The Definitive Handbook of Business Continuity Management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RA (1966) Information value theory. IEEE Transactions on System Science and Cybernetics 2(1):22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber G (1974) Multi-attribute utility models: A review of field and field-like studies. Management Science 20(10):1393–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (2002) Common mistakes in making value tradeoffs. Operations Research 50(6): 935–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, McDaniels T (1999) Identifying and structuring values to guide integrated resource planning at BC Gas. Operations Research 47(5):651–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D (1994) Managing nuclear waste from power plants. Risk Analysis 14(1):107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood C (1997) Strategic Decision Making: Multi-objective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Duxbury-Press, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood C, Slaven M, & Maltz A (2005) Improving supply-chain-reconfiguration decisions at IBM. Interfaces 35(6):460–473. Likert Scale. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likert_scale, accessed 31 Mar. 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson JE, Howard RA (1968) An introduction to decision analysis In: Howard RA, Matheson JE. (Eds) The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis volume I. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell G, Conley H, Jackson J, Lehmkuhl L, & Andrew J (1998) Foundations 2025: A value model for evaluating future air and space forces. Management Science 44(10):1336–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Addison-Wesley.

  • Smith JE, von Winterfeldt D (2004) Decision analysis in ‘Management Science’ Management Science 50(5):561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zawada B, Using Facilitated Methods to Perform Business Impact Analysis. (CISA, CBCP), Product Leader, Business Continuity Management Services http://www.isauditor.net/isaca/Reference/FacilitatingBIA.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rama Akkiraju.

Additional information

Rama Akkiraju is a Distinguished Engineer at the IBM Almaden Research Center in San Jose, California. Since joining IBM Research in 1995, she has worked on agent-based decision support systems, electronic market places, business transformation analytics, business process integration technologies including semantic Web services. She is one of the drivers of W3C standard on SAWSDL (Semantic Annotations for Web Services Description Language) and is the editor of the SAWSDL User guide. Rama is currently working on researching, developing and delivering innovative solutions that transform the services engagement (sales) process for IBM’s services businesses-with an aim to improve the service solution quality and service engagement process effectiveness. Rama has co-authored 4 book chapters, and over 35 technical journal, conference and workshop papers. Rama is the recipient of multiple best paper awards including INFORMs, and Decision Sciences Journal awards. Rama holds a MS degree in computer science and an MBA from New York University, Stern School of Business. Rama graduated at the top of the MBA class in 2004 and received a gold medal of honor from the university.

Debarun Bhattacharjya is a Research Staff Member in the Decision and Risk Analytics team within the broader Business Analytics and Math Sciences division at IBM T.J. Watson Research Center. Debarun’s primary research interests lie in decision and risk analysis, and probabilistic models and decision theory in artificial intelligence. Specifically, he has pursued research on topics such as probabilistic graphical models (influence diagrams and Bayesian networks), value of information, sensitivity analysis and utility theory. His applied work has been in domains such as energy, business services, sales and demography, and he has coauthored more than ten publications in highly refereed journals and conference proceedings. Debarun holds M.S and Ph.D degrees in Management Science and Engineering from Stanford University and a B. Tech degree in Industrial and Production Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi.

Sammukh Gupta has 6 years of experience in the IT industry. He has been working with IBM since 2009 in various assignments ranging from SAP security to Java development. As part of his responsibilities, he currently leads a team working on security & compliance. Sammukh holds a Masters degree in computer application from Andhra University, India. He currently resides in Kolkata, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akkiraju, R., Bhattacharjya, D. & Gupta, S. Towards effective business process availability management. J Serv Sci Res 4, 319–351 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-012-0013-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-012-0013-2

Keywords

Navigation