Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of innovative behavioral intention: Moderating role of real name policy in online community

  • Published:
Journal of Service Science Research

Abstract

Online innovation community can be defined as a digital space where like-minded people have active and ongoing communication. The members share innovative ideas with one another, even build and maintain online or offline personal social ties, but have to comply with the community norms. A few years ago, real name policy was implemented in one country, while it was abolished in another country. The online community environment has changed.

This study attempts to find out whether the interpersonal trust, community norms, belongingness, liberalism and ownership have a positive effect on innovative behavior intention. But, for unidentified users, the factors of interpersonal trust and liberalism do not affect the intention of innovative behaviors. In addition, identified users who are more liberal are more willing to participate in the internet-based innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker JL (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34(3):347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçomak İS & ter Weel B (2009) Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe. European Economic Review 53(5):544–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antorini YM (2007) Brand community innovation-An intrinsic case study of the adult fans of Lego community. Unpublished dissertation. Department of Intercultural Communication and Management, Copenhagen Business School.

  • Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Kwan MY, Lowe D, Taman S, & Faulkner GE (2010) Social norms of alcohol, smoking, and marijuana use within a Canadian university setting. Journal of American College Health 59(3):191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher HB (1997) Presidential Elections & American Politics: Voters, Candidates, and Campaigns since 1952. Harcourt.

  • Bagozzi RP & Yi Y (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(1):8–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian S & Mahajan V (2001) The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5(3):103–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF & Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3):497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk RW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton C & Cummings S (2010) Creative Strategy: Reconnecting Business and Innovation. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Bok GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, & Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1):87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT & Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56(2):81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CS, Chang SF, & Liu CH (2012) Understanding knowledge-sharing motivation, incentive mechanisms, and satisfaction in virtual communities. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 40(4):639–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini RB & Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review Of Psychology 55:591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CM (1992) Deviant adolescent subcultures: Assessment strategies and clinical interventions. Adolescence 27(106):283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNNIC (2015) The 35th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. China Internet Network Information Center.

  • Conover PJ & Feldman S (1981) The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative selfidentifications. American Journal of Political Science 25(4):617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JM & Bates SC (2011) Referent group proximity, social norms, and context: Alcohol use in a low-use environment. Journal of American College Health 59(4):252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander L & Frederiksen L (2012) The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science 23(4):988–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danah B (2012) The politics of ‘real names’: Power, context, and control in networked publics. Communications of the ACM 55(8):29–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt KM & DeWalt BR (2010) Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. AltaMira Press.

  • Dipboye RL (1977) A critical review of Korman’s self-consistency theory of work motivation and occupational choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 18(1):108–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar H (1992) The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is to Be. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Festinger L, Pepitone A, & Newcomb T (1952) Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47(2):382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke N & Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative cctivities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32(1):157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman B, Khan PH Jr., & Howe DC (2000) Trust online. Commun. ACM 43(12):34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1991) Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20(5):499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller J, Jawecki G, & Mühlbacher H (2007) Innovation Creation by Online Basketball Communities. Journal of Business Research 60(1):60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furby L (1978) Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 6(1):49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furby L (1991) Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: A personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6(6):457–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Rose GM, Warkentin M, & Pavlou PA (2005) Cultural diversity and trust in ITadoption: A comparison of potential e-voters in the USA and South Africa. Journal of Global Information Management 13(1):54–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1998) The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Wiley.

  • Grange AL & Ming YN (2001) Social belonging, social capital and the promotion of home ownership: A case study of Hong Kong. Housing Studies 16(3):291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagel J & Armstrong A (1997) Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities. Harvard Business School Press.

  • Hagerty BM, Williams RA, Coyne JC, & Early MR (1996) Sense of belonging and indicators of social and psychological functioning. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 10(4):235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff D, Henkel J, & von Hippel E (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy 32(10):1753–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt C & von Hippel E (1992) From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a ‘low-tech’ field. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(3):213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu MH, Ju TL, Yen CH, & Chang CM (2007) Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(2):153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu MH, Chang CM, & Yen CH (2011) Exploring the antecedents of trust in virtual communities. Behaviour and Information Technology 30(5):587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KR, Kurdek L, & Larson P (1983) Relationships between pet ownership and selfesteem, social sensitivity, and interpersonal trust. Psychological Reports 52(1):110–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs S (1933) Social development in young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology 3(3):291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J (1965) Structural characteristics ofnorms. In Steiner ID & Fishbein M (eds.) Current Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O (2000) Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73(3):287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, & Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 10:169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek D, Ahern J, & Galea S (2012) Social norms, collective efficacy, and smoking cessation in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health 102(2):343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesner J, Cadinu M, Poulin F, & Bucci M (2002) Group identification in early adolescence: Its relation with peer adjustment and its moderator effect on peer influence. Child Development 73(1):196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd Ed.) Methodology in the Social Sciences series. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack S & Keefer P (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4):1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korman AK (1970) Toward a hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 54:(1)31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee VE & Burkam DT (2003) Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal 40(2):353–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeJacq Y (2012) Facebook real name policy challenged by German privacy watchdog. International Business Times 12/18/2012.http://www.ibtimes.com/facebook-real-namepolicy-challenged-german-privacy-watchdog-948768. Accessed on 2014-11-11.

  • Levett-Jones T & Lathlean J (2008) Belongingness: A prerequisite for nursing students’ clinical learning. Nurse Education in Practice 8(2):103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levett-Jones T, Lathlean J, Higgins I, & McMillan M (2009) Staff-student relationships and their impact on nursing students’ belongingness and learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(2):316–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine LE (1983) Mine: Self-definition in 2-year-old boys. Developmental Psychology 19 (4):544–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin TE & Miller WE (1979) Ideological interpretations of presidential elections. The American Political Science Review 73(3):751–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwinski L (1942) Is there an instinct of possession? British Journal of Psychology General Section 33(1):28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon DW (1962) The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist 17(7):484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacVaugh J & Schiavone F (2010) Limits to the diffusion of innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 13(2):197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1954) Motivation and Personality. Harper.

  • Mathes EW & Guest TA (1976) Anonymity and group antisocial behavior. Journal of Social Psychology 100(2):257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, & Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20(3):709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medsker GJ, Williams LJ, & Holahan PJ (1994) A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management 20(2):439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michau L (2007) Approaching old problems in new ways: Community mobilisation as a primary prevention strategy to combat violence against women. Gender and Development 15(1):95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD & Gustafson SB (1988) Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin 103(1):27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J & Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2):242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan S (2002) Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review 27(3):392–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson WA, Knott TA, & Carhart PW (1960) Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language. G and C Merriam Company.

  • Paredes A (2011) Google, Facebook now dissuage aliases on profiles: Social networks urge users to use real names. International Business Times 09/06/2011. http://www.ibtimes.com.au/google-facebook-now-dissuade-aliases-profiles-1285167.Accessed on 2014-11-10.

  • Park KJ (2005) Internet abuse and a real-name system for users. Korea Focus 13(4):47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington RH, Wilcox D, & Grover V (2003) The role of system trust in business-toconsumer transactions. Journal of Management Information System 20(3):197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JL, Kostova T, & Dirks KT (2003) The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 7(1):84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsonneault A & Heppel N (1997) Anonymity in group support systems research: New conceptualization and measure. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2:134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi I, Fang Y, Ramsey E, McCole P, Ibbotson P, & Compeau D (2009) Understanding online customer repurchasing intention and the mediating role of trust-an empirical investigation in two developed countries. European Journal of Information Systems 18 (3):205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingam P (2005) Trust in inter-organizational exchanges: A case study in business to business electronic commerce. Decision Support Systems 39(3):525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds B, Ortengren A, Richards JB, & de Wit H (2006) Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences 40(2): 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, revised edition. The MIT Press.

  • Ridings CM, Gefen D, & Arinze B (2002) Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11(3/4):271–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegelsberger J, Sasse MA, & McCarthy JD (2005) The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62(3):381–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JP, Shaver PR, & Wrightsman LS (1999) Measures of Political Attitudes. Academic Press.

  • Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.

  • Rudmin FW (1991) To Have Possessions: A Handbook on Ownership and Property. Select Press.

  • Rydzik A, Pritchard A, Morgan N, & Sedgley D (2013) The potential of arts-based transformative research. Annals of Tourism Research 40:283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar LF, Baker CK, Price AW, & Carlin K (2003) Moving beyond the individual: Examining the effects of domestic violence policies on social norms. American Journal of Community Psychology 32(3/4):253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz E (2012) Sina off; Rpt China microblogs to require real names. Forbes.com http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2012/02/07/sina-off-rpt-china-microblogs-to-requirereal- names/#2715e4857a0b70f3559e2920. Accessed on 2014-11-10.

  • Shah S (2000) Sources and patterns of innovation in a consumer products field: Innovations in sporting equipment. MIT Sloan Working Paper #4105.

  • Sheth JN (1981) Psychology of innovation resistance: The Less Developed Concept (LDC) in diffusion research. InSheth JN (Ed.) Research in Marketing. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. 273-282.

  • Shu W & Chuang YH (2011) Why people share knowledge in virtual communities. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 39(5):671–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius J & Ekehammar B (1979) Political socialization: A multivariate analysis of Swedish political attitude and preference data. European Journal of Social Psychology 9(3):265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sills DL (1968) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Macmillan.

  • Sniderman B (2012) The five personalities of innovators: Which one are you? Forbes.com http://www.forbes.com/sites/brennasniderman/2012/03/21/the-five-personalities-of-innovators-which-one-are-you/#2715e4857a0b1ca1a28855dd. MAR 21, 2012 Accessed on November 12, 2014.

  • Stone MR & Brown BB (1999) Identity claims and projections: Descriptions of self and crowds in secondary school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1999(84):7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper M (1992) The limits to globalization: Technology districts and international trade. Economic Geography 68(1):60–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits PA (1982) Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 23(2):145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usdin S, Scheepers E, Goldstein S, & Japhet G (2005) Achieving social change on genderbased violence: A report on the impact evaluation of Soul City’s fourth series. Social Science and Medicine 61(11):2434–2445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science 32(5):590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Angle HL, & Poole MS (1989) Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. Harper and Row.

  • von Hayek FA (1978) Why I Am Not a Conservative. In The Constitution of Liberty. The University of Chicago Press.

  • von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

  • von Hippel E (2007) Horizontal innovation networks-by and for users, Industrial and Corporate Change 16(2):293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilpert B (1991) Property, ownership, and participation: On the growing contradictions between legal and psychological concepts. In Russell R and Rus V (Eds.), International handbook of participation in organizations: For the study of organizational democracy, co-operation, and self-management. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2:149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, & Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review 18(2):293–321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shasha Li.

Additional information

Shasha Li was a mater student at the Department of Digital Management in Korea. She holds a Bachelor degree from.Her research interests include areas such as medical information system, e-business, online privacy, and mobile business.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S. Determinants of innovative behavioral intention: Moderating role of real name policy in online community. J Serv Sci Res 6, 225–256 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-014-0009-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-014-0009-1

Keywords

Navigation