Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classifying cognitive states of brain activity via one-class neural networks with feature selection by genetic algorithms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally assumed that one-class machine learning techniques can not reach the performance level of two-class techniques. The importance of this work is that while one-class is often the appropriate classification setting for identifying cognitive brain functions, most work in the literature has focused on two-class methods. In this paper, we demonstrate how one-class recognition of cognitive brain functions across multiple subjects can be performed at the 90% level of accuracy via an appropriate choice of features which can be chosen automatically. Our work extends one-class work by Hardoon and Manevitz (fMRI analysis via one-class machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth IJCAI, pp 1604–1605, 2005), where such classification was first shown to be possible in principle albeit with an accuracy of about 60%. The results of this paper are also comparable to work of various groups around the world e.g. Cox and Savoy (NeuroImage 19:261–270, 2003), Mourao-Miranda et al. (NeuroImage, 2006) and Mitchell et al., (Mach Learn 57:145–175, 2004) which have concentrated on two-class classification. The strengthening in the feature selection was accomplished by the use of a genetic algorithm run inside the context of a wrapper approach around a compression neural network for the basic one-class identification. In addition, versions of one-class SVM due to Scholkopf et al. (Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Technical Report MSR-TR-99-87, Microsoft Research, 1999) and Manevitz and Yousef (J Mach Learn Res 2:139–154, 2001) were investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cox D, Savoy R (2003) Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fmri activity in human visual cortex. NeuroImage 19:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell TM, Hutchison R, Niculescu RS, Pereira F, Wang X, Just M, Newman S (2004) Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach Learn 57:145–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mourao-Miranda J, Reynaud E, McGlone F, Calvert G, Brammer M (2006) The impact of temporal compression and space selection on svm analysis of single-subject and multi-subject fmri data. NeuroImage. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.016

  4. Hardoon DR, Manevitz LM (2005) fMRI analysis via one-class machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth IJCAI, pp 1604–1605

  5. Carlson TA, Schrater P, He S (2004) Patterns of activity in the categorical representations of objects. J Cog Neurosci 15(5):704–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira F, Mitchell T, Botvinick M (2009) Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview. NeuroImage 45:S199–S209 (Mathematics in Brain Imaging)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Talarich J, Tournoux P (1988) Coplanar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme Medical, p 122

  8. Japkowicz N, Myers C, Gluck MA (1995) A novelty detection approach to classification. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 518–523

  9. Manevitz L, Yousef M (2001) One-class svms for document classification. J Mach Learn Res 2:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sato J, da Graca Morais Martin M, Fujita A, Mourao-Miranda J, Brammer M, Amaro E Jr (2009) An fMRI normative database for connectivity networks using one-class support vector machines. Human Brain Mapp 30:1068–1076

  11. Yang J, Zhong N, Liang P, Wang J, Yao Y, Lu S (2010) Brain activation detection by neighborhood one-class svm. Cogn Syst Res 11:16–24 (Brain Informatics)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scholkopf B, Platt J, Shawe-Taylor J, Smola A, Williamson R (1999) Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Technical Report MSR-TR-99-87, Microsoft Research

  13. Kohavi R, John GH (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence

  14. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM (1997) The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17:4302–4311

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cottrell GW, Munro P, Zipser D (1988) Image compression by back propagation: an example of extensional programming. Adv Cogn Sci 3

  16. Manevitz L, Yousef M (2007) Document classification via neural networks trained exclusively with positive examples. Neurocomputing 70:1466–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing company, Inc.

  18. Hasson U, Harel M, Levy I, Malach R (2003) Large-scale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal objects areas. Neuron 37:1027–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy I, Hasson U, Avidan G, Hendler T, Malach R (2001) Center-periphery organization of humand object areas. Nat Neurosci 4(5):533–539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry M. Manevitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boehm, O., Hardoon, D.R. & Manevitz, L.M. Classifying cognitive states of brain activity via one-class neural networks with feature selection by genetic algorithms. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 2, 125–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0030-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0030-3

Keywords

Navigation