Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of boundary shape using a hybrid approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a hybrid approach combining quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) and conjugate gradient method is proposed to identify boundary shape of the geometry under steady state conditions. No prior information about the shape is available, so the inverse problem is classified as function estimation. Least square method is used to model the inverse problem, which intends to minimize the difference between measured and calculated data. Considering ill-posedness of the inverse problem, Tikhonov regularization method is used to stabilize the solution. The numerical results show that the proposed hybrid method is able to recover the boundary shape, and can sharply reduce the required computation time. While considering the oscillations at the both boundaries of the estimated results, the parallel QPSO is used in order to both obtain better estimation and reduce computation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banks HT, Kojima F (1989) Boundary shape identification problems in two-dimensional domains related to thermal testing of materials. Quart J Appl Math 47:273–293

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Pironneau O (1984) Optimal shape design for elliptic systems, New York

  3. Sunahara Y, Kojima F (1986) Boundary identification for a two dimensional diffusion system under noisy observations. In: Proc. 4th IFAC symp. control of distributed parameter systems, UCLA, California, Pergamon Press, New York

  4. Rondi L (1999) Optimal stability estimates for determination of defects by electrostatic measurements. Inverse Prob 15(5):1193–1212

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Aparicio ND, Pidcock MK (1996) The boundary inverse problem for the Laplace equation in two dimensions. Inverse Prob 12(5):565–577

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Beretta E, Vessella S (1998) Stable determination of boundaries from Cauchy data. SIAM J Math Anal 30(1):220–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hon YC, Wu Z (2000) A numerical computation for inverse boundary determination problem. Eng Anal Bound Elem 24(7):599–606

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nachaoui A (2003) An improved implementation of an iterative method in boundary identification problems. Numer Algorithms 33(1–4):381–398

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Mera NS, Elliott L, Ingham DB (2004) Numerical solution of a boundary detection problem using genetic algorithm. Eng Anal Bound Elem 28(4):405–411

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dashti-Ardakani M, Khodadad M (2009) Identification of thermal conductivity and the shape of an inclusion using the boundary elements method and the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Inv Prob Sci Eng 17(7):855–870

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Khodadad M, Dashi-Ardakani M (2008) Inclusion identification by inverse application of boundary element method, genetic algorithm and conjugate gradient method. Am J Appl Sci 5(9):1158–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morozov VA (1966) On the solution of functional equations by the method of regularization [J]. Soviet Math Dokl 7:414–417

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen PC (2001) The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems, computational inverse problem in electrocardiology. WIT Press, Holland, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sun J, Feng B, Xu WB (2004) Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behaviour. Congress Evolutionary Computing, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun J, Xu WB, Feng B (2004) A global search strategy of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization, IEEE Conference on cybernetics and intelligent systems, Singapore

  16. Sun J, Xu WB, Feng B (2005) Adaptive parameter control for quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization on individual level, IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Hawaii

  17. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization, IEEE international conference neural networks, Perth, Australia

  18. Ang KC (2008) Introducing the boundary element method with MATLAB. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 39(4):505–519

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunter P, Pullan A (2001) FEM/BEM notes. The University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kythe PK (1995) An introduction to boundary element methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Eberhart RC, Shi Y (1998) Comparison between genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Evolutionary programming VII. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1447. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 611–616

  22. Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm: explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Clerc M (1999) The swarm and the queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization. Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bratton D, Kennedy J (2007) Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization, IEEE swarm intelligence symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii

  25. Van den Bergh F (2001) An analysis of particle swarm optimizers. Ph.D. diss., University of Pretoria, South Africa

  26. Bourgeois L, Chaulet N, Haddar H (2012) On simultaneous identification of the shape and generalized impedance boundary condition in obstacle scattering. SIAM J Sci Comput 34(3):1824–1848

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Bin-Mohsin B, Lesnic D (2012) Determination of inner boundaries in modified Helmholtz inverse geometric problems using the method of fundamental solutions. Math Comput Simul 82:1445–1458

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Chauhan Pinkey, Pant Millie, Deep Kusum (2014) Parameter optimization of multi-pass turning using chaotic PSO. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet. doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0221-1

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tian Na, Lai Choi-Hong (2013) Parallel quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet. doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0168-2

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ma W, Wang M, Zhu X (2013) Improved particle swarm optimization based approach for bilevel programming problem-an application on supply chain model. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0167-3

  31. Wang X, He Y, Dong L, Zhao H (2011) Particle swarm optimization for determining fuzzy measures from data. Inf Sci 181(19):4230–4252

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the innovative research of Jiangnan University (Project Number: 1245210382130120, 1242050205142810), by National high technology research development plan project (Project Number: 2013AA040405).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Na Tian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, N., Zhu, L. & Lai, CH. Identification of boundary shape using a hybrid approach. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 6, 385–397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0266-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0266-9

Keywords

Navigation