Skip to main content
Log in

Hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic set and its application in multiple attribute decision making

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by the ideas of interval neutrosophic linguistic sets and hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs), this paper proposes the concept of hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic sets by combining the three concepts of the HFS, interval neutrosophic set, and linguistic set and defines the operational laws of hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic elements (HINLEs) and the score, accuracy, and certainty functions for HINLEs. Then, a hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic weighted average (HINLWA) operator and a hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic weighted geometric (HINLWG) operator are developed to aggregate the hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic information. Moreover, some desirable properties of the two operators are investigated. A decision-making method based on the HINLWA and HINLWG operators is developed to handle multiple attribute decision-making problems, in which evaluation values of each alternative with respect to attributes are expressed by the form of HINLEs, under hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic environment. Finally, an illustrative example about investment alternatives is given to demonstrate the application of the developed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broumi S, Ye J, Smarandache F (2015) An extended TOPSIS method for multiple attribute decision making based on interval neutrosophic uncertain linguistic variables. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 8:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chi PP, Liu PD (2013) An extended TOPSIS method for the multiple attribute decision making problems based on interval neutrosophic sets. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 1:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(1):73–87

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. He YD, He Z, Wang GD, Chen HY (2015) Hesitant fuzzy power Bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23:1655–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He YD, He Z, Chen HY (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Bonferroni means and its application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern 45:116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He YD, He Z (2016) Extensions of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2460750

    Google Scholar 

  8. He Y, Wang X, Huang JZ (2016) Recent advances in multiple criteria decision making techniques. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0490-y

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liang X, Wei C, Chen Z (2013) An intuitionistic fuzzy weighted OWA operator and its application. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4(6):713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu PD, Chu YC, Li YW, Chen YB (2014) Some generalized neutrosophic number Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 16(2):242–255

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu PD, Wang YM (2014) Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Comput Appl 25(7–8):2001–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: The 18th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems. Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 1378–1382

  14. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2005) Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: theory and applications in computing. Hexis, Phoenix

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52:395–407

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42(4):386–394

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye J (2014) Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multicriteria decision making problems. Appl Math Model 38:1170–1175

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ye J (2014) Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:165–172

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye J (2014) Some aggregation operators of interval neutrosophic linguistic numbers for multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:2231–2241

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye J (2015) An extended TOPSIS method for multiple attribute group decision making based on single valued neutrosophic linguistic numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28:247–255

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Ye J (2015) Multiple-attribute decision-making method under a single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy environment. J Intell Syst 24(1):23–36

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ye J (2017) Multiple attribute group decision making based on interval neutrosophic uncertain linguistic variables. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8(3):837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Part I. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang HY, Wang JQ, Chen XH (2014) Interval neutrosophic sets and their application in multicriteria decision making problems. Sci World J 2014:645953. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/645953

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 71471172).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, J. Hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic set and its application in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 10, 667–678 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0747-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0747-8

Keywords

Navigation