Skip to main content
Log in

A composite contract for coordinating a supply chain with sales effort-dependent fuzzy demand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the coordination problem for a supply chain composed of one supplier and one retailer when the demand is a fuzzy variable that is dependent on sales effort. We find that neither a buyback contract nor a promotion cost-sharing contract can coordinate the supply chain in this setting. Furthermore, we design a composite contract by combining a buyback contract with a promotion cost-sharing contract to coordinate the supply chain and analyze the coordination conditions. We also draw a performance comparison of the designed composite contract and the price-only contract for the profit maximization of the supply chain and present some extensions. Finally, the main theoretical results and the effectiveness of the designed composite contract are illustrated with numerical examples. We show that the production cost and sensitivity parameter of effort cost have negative impacts on the expected profits of the supplier, the retailer and the entire supply chain, whereas basic demand and the sensitivity parameter of demand stimulation have positive impacts on their profits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://en.qianzhan.com/report/detail/ce124163a5bb40f4.html.

References

  1. Aamir R, Ashfaq R, Wang XZ, Huang JZ et al (2017) Fuzziness based semi-supervised learning approach for intrusion detection system. Inf Sci 378:484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdul-Jalbar B, Colebrook M, Dorta-Guerra R, Gutierrez JM (2016) Centralized and decentralized inventory policies for a single-vendor two-buyer system with permissible delay in payments. Comput Oper Res 74:187–195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Aljazzar SM, Jaber MY, Moussawi-Haidar L (2017) Coordination of a three-level supply chain (supplier–manufacturer–retailer) with permissible delay in payments and price discounts. Appl Math Model 48:289–302

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Aljazzar SM, Jaber MY, Moussawi-Haidar L (2016) Coordination of a three-level supply chain (supplier–manufacturer–retailer) with permissible delay in payments. Appl Math Model 40(21):9594–9614

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bai QG, Xu XH, Xu JT, Wang D (2016) Coordinating a supply chain for deteriorating items with multi-factor-dependent demand over a finite planning horizon. Appl Math Model 40(21):9342–9361

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Basiri Z, Heydari J (2017) A mathematical model for green supply chain coordination with substitutable products. J Clean Prod 145:232–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blattberg RC, Neslin SA (1990) Sales promotion: concepts, methods, and strategies. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handb Oper Res Manag Sci 11:227–339

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Manag Sci 51(1):30–44

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang S, Yeh T (2013) A two-echelon supply chain of a returnable product with fuzzy demand. Appl Math Model 37(6):4305–4315

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiu CH, Choi TM, Li X (2015) Supply chain coordination with risk sensitive retailer under target sales rebate. Automatica 47(8):1617–1625

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Donohue K (2000) Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Manag Sci 46(11):1397–1411

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehring D (2006) The Walmart model. Mortg Bank 67:114–117

    Google Scholar 

  14. Emmons H, Gilbert S (1998) Return policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Manag Sci 44(2):276–283

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Eppen G, Iyer A (1997) Backup agreements in fashion buying—the value of upstream flexibility. Manag Sci 43(11):1469–1484

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurnani H, Erkoc M, Luo Y (2007) Impact of product pricing and timing of investment decisions on supply chain coopetition. Eur J Oper Res 180(1):228–248

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hacket SC (1993) Consignment contracting. J Econ Behav Org 20:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He Y, Zhao X, Zhao LD, He J (2009) Coordinating a supply chain with effort and price dependent stochastic demand. Appl Math Model 33(6):2777–2790

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Heydari J (2013) Coordinating replenishment decisions in a two-stage supply chain by considering truckload limitation based on delay in payments. Int J Syst Sci 46(10):1–12

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Heydari J (2014) Supply chain coordination using time-based temporary price discounts. Comput Ind Eng 75:96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heydari J, Norouzinasab Y (2015) A two-level discount model for coordinating a decentralized supply chain considering stochastic price-sensitive demand. J Ind Eng Int 11(4):531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heydari J, Najafi JA (2016) Coordinating inventory decisions in a two-echelon supply chain through the target sales rebate contract. Int J Invent Res 3(1):49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu BY, Feng Y (2017) Optimization and coordination of supply chain with revenue sharing contracts and service requirement under supply and demand uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 183:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu BY, Meng C, Xu D, Son YJ (2016) Three-echelon supply chain coordination with a loss-averse retailer and revenue sharing contracts. Int J Prod Econ 179:192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jørgensen S, Sigue SP, Zaccour G (2000) Dynamic cooperative advertising in a channel. J Retail 76(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaya O (2011) Outsourcing vs. in-house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts. Omega 39:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krishnan H, Kapuscinski R, Butz DA (2004) Coordinating contracts for decentralized supply chains with manufacturer promotional effort. Manag Sci 50(1):48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lan YF, Zhao RQ, Tang WS (2014) A fuzzy supply chain contract problem with pricing and warranty. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1527–1538

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lau H, Su C, Wang Y, Hua Z (2012) Volume discounting coordinates a supply chain effectively when demand is sensitive to both price and sales effort. Comput Oper Res 39(12):3267–3280

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee C, Rhee B (2011) Trade credit for supply chain coordination. Eur J Oper Res 214(1):136–146

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu B (2004) Uncertainty theory: an introduction to its axiomatic foundations. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma P, Wang HY, Shang J (2013) Contract design for two-stage supply chain coordination: integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts. Int J Prod Econ 146:745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma P, Wang HY, Shang J (2013) Supply chain channel strategies with quality and marketing effort-dependent demand. Int J Prod Econ 144:572–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Padmanabhan V, Png IPL (1997) Manufactrrer’s return policy and retail competition. Mark Sci 16(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pasternack B (1985) Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities. Mark Sci 4(2):166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Petrovic B, Roy R, Petrovic R (1999) Supply chain modelling using fuzzy sets. Int J Prod Econ 53:443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ryu K, Yücesan E (2010) A fuzzy newsvendor approach to supply chain coordination. Eur J Oper Res 200(2):421–438

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Shen Y, Willems SP (2012) Coordinating a channel with asymmetric cost information and the manufacturer’s optimality. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Song Y, Ray S, Li S (2008) Structural properties of buyback contracts for price-setting newsvendors. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 10(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stalk G, Evans P, Shulman LE (1992) Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. Harv Bus Rev 70(2):57–69

    Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor TA (2002) Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales efforts. Manag Sci 48(8):992–1007

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsao Y, Sheen G (2012) Effects of promotion cost sharing policy with the sales learning curve on supply chain coordination. Comput Oper Res 39(8):1872–1878

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2000) Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 2(4):372–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang H, Wang W, Kobaccy K (2007) Analysis and design of returns policies from a supplier’s perspective. J Oper Res Soc 58:391–401

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang JY, Zhao RQ, Tang WS (2008) Supply chain coordination by revenue-sharing contract with fuzzy demand. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 19(6):409–420

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang JY, Zhao RQ, Tang WS (2009) Supply chain coordination by single-period and long-term contracts with fuzzy market demand. Tsinghua Sci Technol 14(2):218–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang R, Kwon S, Wang XZ, Jiang QS (2015) Segment based decision tree induction with continuous valued attributes. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(7):1262–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang XB, Wang XH (2009) Supply chain coordination based on buy back contract with fuzzy demand. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on machine learning and cybernetics. IEEE, pp 839–843

  49. Wang XZ, Aamir R, Fu AM (2015) Fuzziness based sample categorization for classifier performance improvement. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(3):1185–1196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang XZ, Xing HJ, Li Y et al (2015) A study on relationship between generalization abilities and fuzziness of base classifiers in ensemble learning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(5):1638–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wei J, Sun L, Xia J (2009) Supply chain coordination with fuzzy demand.  In: Proceedings of ICAL ’09, IEEE international conference on automation and logistics. IEEE, pp 1786–1790 

  52. Wei Y, Chen Y (2011) Joint determination of inventory replenishment and sales effort with uncertain market responses. Int J Prod Econ 134:368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Weng Z (1995) Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Manag Sci 41(9):1509–1522

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu DD (2013) Bargaining in supply chain with price and promotional effort dependent demand. Math Comput Model 58(9–10):1659–1669

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. Xing D, Liu T (2012) Sales effort free riding and coordination with price match and channel rebate. Eur J Oper Res 219(2):264–271

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Xu R, Zhai X (2010) Analysis of supply chain coordination under fuzzy demand in a two-stage supply chain. Appl Math Model 34(1):129–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Xu R, Zhai X (2010) Manufacturer’s coordination mechanism for single-period supply chain problems with fuzzy demand. Math Comput Model 51(5–6):693–699

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Yu AM, Liu LW (2012) Competing and coordination strategies for the dual-channel under stochastic demand and cooperative promotion. J Ind Eng Eng Manag 26(1):151–154

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang Q, Sang S (2010) Returns policy in supply chain with fuzzy demand.  In: Proceedings of 7th IEEE international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM). IEEE, pp 1–5

  60. Zhao J, Wei J (2014) The coordinating contracts for a fuzzy supply chain with effort and price dependent demand. Appl Math Model 38:2476–2489

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Zissis D, Ioannou G, Burnetas A (2015) Supply chain coordination under discrete information asymmetries and quantity discounts. Omega 53:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71471126, 61402260), Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation of Key Project (No. 2015CFA144) and the Special Funds of Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibing Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Liu, Z. & Chen, H. A composite contract for coordinating a supply chain with sales effort-dependent fuzzy demand. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 10, 949–965 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0774-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0774-5

Keywords

Navigation