Abstract
The main objective of a production assurance program (PAP) for a production plant is to ensure that the planned production capacity is achieved. The assurance programs describe the activities necessary to fulfil the objectives, how they will be carried out, by whom, and when. These activities also provide input to decisions-making regarding design, manufacturing, construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of plants. It is a challenge to manage and improve production assurance. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss a methodology for improvement of production assurance performance through PAP, organized into four steps, namely data collection and information management, modeling and data analysis, generation of improvement alternatives and evaluation and decision-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aven T (1986) On the computation of certain measures of importance of system components. Microelectron Reliab 26:279–281
Aven T, Vinnem JE, Rød W (2006) On the use of goals, quantitative criteria and requirements in safety management. Risk Manage 8:118–132
Barabady J, Terje A (2007) Implementation of production availability programmes in engineering projects, Proceedings, European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), Stavanger, Norway, pp 487–494
Barabady J, Kumar U (2007) Availability allocation through importance measures. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 24(6): 643–656
Barabady J, Kumar U (2007) Reliability characteristics based maintenance scheduling: A case study of a crushing plant. Int J Performab Eng 3(3):319–328
Blanchard BS, Verma D, Peterson EL (1995) Maintainability: a key to effective serviceability and maintenance management, New York: Wiley
Gao X, Markeset T (2007) A review of Production Assurance in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 20–26th August, Beijing, China
Ghodrati B, Kumar U (2005) Operating environment based spare parts forecasting and logistics: a case study. Int J Logistics: Res Appl 8:95–105
Hjorteland A, Aven T (2003) Reliability analysis and observables. Proceedings of the 14th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2003) Vol. 1, ISBN 90 5809 551 7, Maastricht
IEC 60300-3-10 (2001) International Standard IEC 60300-3-10: Dependability management — Part 3–10: Application guide — Maintainability, IEC, Geneva
IEC 60706-3 (2006) International Standard IEC 60706-3: Maintainability of equipment — Part 3: Verification and collection, analysis and presentation of data, 2nd edn., IEC, Geneva
IEV 191 (2007) International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) Online, Chapter 191: Dependability and quality of service. http://std.iec.ch/iec60050 (accessed April 2007)
International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Reliability Assurance Programme Guidebook for Advanced Light Water Reactors, Vienna: IAEA
ISO 20815 (2008) Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Production assurance and reliability management http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39744, accessed August 14th, 2008
ISO/DIS 14224 (2004) Petroleum, petrochemical, and natural gas industries—Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment
Kawauchi Y, Rausand M (2002) A new approach to production regularity/availability assessment in the oil and chemical industries. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 75:379–388
Kumar U, Barabady J (2007) Production assurance performance concept, Swedish Production Symposium, Gothenburg, 28–30 August, Sweden
Markeset T (2003) Dimensioning of Product Support: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities, Doctoral Thesis No. 6, University of Stavanger, ISBN 82-7644-197-1, ISSN 1502-3877
Markeset T, Kumar U (2003) Design and development of product support & maintenance concepts for industrial systems. J Qual Mainten Eng 9(4)
Nakajima S (1998) Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press Cambridge
NORSOK Z-016, (Norwegian Technology Standard Institution) (2003) Regularity Management and Reliability Technology
Tsai YT, Wang KS, Teng HY (2001) Optimizing preventive maintenance for mechanical components using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 74:89–97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barabady, J., Markeset, T. & Kumar, U. A framework for improvement of production plant performance using production assurance programs. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1, 59–65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-010-0001-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-010-0001-1