Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for improvement of production plant performance using production assurance programs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of a production assurance program (PAP) for a production plant is to ensure that the planned production capacity is achieved. The assurance programs describe the activities necessary to fulfil the objectives, how they will be carried out, by whom, and when. These activities also provide input to decisions-making regarding design, manufacturing, construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of plants. It is a challenge to manage and improve production assurance. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss a methodology for improvement of production assurance performance through PAP, organized into four steps, namely data collection and information management, modeling and data analysis, generation of improvement alternatives and evaluation and decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aven T (1986) On the computation of certain measures of importance of system components. Microelectron Reliab 26:279–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aven T, Vinnem JE, Rød W (2006) On the use of goals, quantitative criteria and requirements in safety management. Risk Manage 8:118–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barabady J, Terje A (2007) Implementation of production availability programmes in engineering projects, Proceedings, European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), Stavanger, Norway, pp 487–494

  4. Barabady J, Kumar U (2007) Availability allocation through importance measures. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 24(6): 643–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barabady J, Kumar U (2007) Reliability characteristics based maintenance scheduling: A case study of a crushing plant. Int J Performab Eng 3(3):319–328

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchard BS, Verma D, Peterson EL (1995) Maintainability: a key to effective serviceability and maintenance management, New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gao X, Markeset T (2007) A review of Production Assurance in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 20–26th August, Beijing, China

  8. Ghodrati B, Kumar U (2005) Operating environment based spare parts forecasting and logistics: a case study. Int J Logistics: Res Appl 8:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hjorteland A, Aven T (2003) Reliability analysis and observables. Proceedings of the 14th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2003) Vol. 1, ISBN 90 5809 551 7, Maastricht

  10. IEC 60300-3-10 (2001) International Standard IEC 60300-3-10: Dependability management — Part 3–10: Application guide — Maintainability, IEC, Geneva

  11. IEC 60706-3 (2006) International Standard IEC 60706-3: Maintainability of equipment — Part 3: Verification and collection, analysis and presentation of data, 2nd edn., IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. IEV 191 (2007) International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) Online, Chapter 191: Dependability and quality of service. http://std.iec.ch/iec60050 (accessed April 2007)

  13. International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Reliability Assurance Programme Guidebook for Advanced Light Water Reactors, Vienna: IAEA

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO 20815 (2008) Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Production assurance and reliability management http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39744, accessed August 14th, 2008

  15. ISO/DIS 14224 (2004) Petroleum, petrochemical, and natural gas industries—Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment

  16. Kawauchi Y, Rausand M (2002) A new approach to production regularity/availability assessment in the oil and chemical industries. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 75:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar U, Barabady J (2007) Production assurance performance concept, Swedish Production Symposium, Gothenburg, 28–30 August, Sweden

  18. Markeset T (2003) Dimensioning of Product Support: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities, Doctoral Thesis No. 6, University of Stavanger, ISBN 82-7644-197-1, ISSN 1502-3877

  19. Markeset T, Kumar U (2003) Design and development of product support & maintenance concepts for industrial systems. J Qual Mainten Eng 9(4)

  20. Nakajima S (1998) Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press Cambridge

  21. NORSOK Z-016, (Norwegian Technology Standard Institution) (2003) Regularity Management and Reliability Technology

  22. Tsai YT, Wang KS, Teng HY (2001) Optimizing preventive maintenance for mechanical components using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 74:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uday Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barabady, J., Markeset, T. & Kumar, U. A framework for improvement of production plant performance using production assurance programs. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1, 59–65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-010-0001-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-010-0001-1

Keywords

Navigation