Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of neuro-fuzzy based expert system in water quality assessment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research a framework is developed to predict the drinking water quality through the neural network models. A fuzzy rule-based system and similarity measure algorithm yield a water quality index for different sampling locations in a water distribution network (WDN), and a neural network is trained using the quality indices. Different sources of uncertainty exist in this model, including deficient, missing, and noisy data, conflicting water quality parameters and subjective information. Hourly and monthly data from Quebec City WDN are used to illustrate the performance of the proposed neuro-fuzzy model. Also, historical data from 52 sampling locations of Quebec City network is utilized to develop the rule-based model in order to train the neural network. Water quality is evaluated by categorizing quality parameters in two groups including microbial and physicochemical. Two sets of rules are defined using expert knowledge to assign water quality grades to each sampling location in the WDN. The fuzzy inference system outputs are deffuzzified using a similarity measure algorithm in this approach. The fuzzy inference system acts as a decision making agent. A utility function provides microbial and physicochemical water quality indices. Final results are used to train the neural network. In the proposed framework, microbial and physicochemical quality of water are predicted individually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghaarabi E, Aminravan F, Sadiq R, Hoorfar M, Najjaran H (2014) Comparative study of fuzzy evidential reasoning and fuzzy rule-based approaches. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:655–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminravan F, Sadiq R, Hoorfar M, Rodriguez MJ, Francisque A, Najjaran H (2011) Evidential reasoning using extended fuzzy Dempster-Shafer theory for handling various facets of information deficiency. Int J Intell Syst 26:731–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazartseren B, Hildebrandt G, Holz K-P (2003) Short-term water level prediction using neural networks and neuro-fuzzy approach. Neurocomputing 55(3–4):439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH (1999) Similarity of generalized fuzzy number with graded mean integration representation. Eights Int Fuzzy Syst Assoc World Congr 2:899–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Chen SM (2003) Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ALP, Chiu J, Tseng F (1996) Evaluating aggregate operations over imprecise data. Knowl Data Eng, IEEE Trans 8(2):273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Sadiq R, Jiang W, Tesfamariam S (2011) Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: a fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):15438–15446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisque A, Rodriguez MJ, Sadiq R, Miranda L, Proulx F (2009) Prioritizing monitoring locations in a water distribution network: a fuzzy risk approach. J Water Supply 58(7):488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner M, Dorling S (1998) Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ 32(14–15):2627–2636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharibi H et al (2012) Development of a dairy cattle drinking water quality index (DCWQI) based on fuzzy inference systems. Ecol Indic 20:228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HS (2002) Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 132(3):303–315

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Melek W, Sadeghian A, Najjaran H, Hoorfar M (2005) A neurofuzzy-based expert system for disease diagnosis. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern 4(1):3736–3741

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ (2005) Interpreting drinking water quality in the distribution system using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Chemosphere 59(2):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Xu D (2002) On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. Syst Man Cybern Part A 32(3):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim Y, Bayramoglu M (2006) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy based modelling for prediction of air pollution daily levels in city of Zonguldak. Chemosphere 63(9):1575–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong D, Wenkang S, Feng D, Qi L (2004) A new similarity measure of generalized fuzzy numbers and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn Lett 25(8):875–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Okanagan School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    E. Aghaarabi, F. Aminravan, R. Sadiq, M. Hoorfar & H. Najjaran

  2. École supérieure d’aménagement du territoire et développement régional, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada

    M. J. Rodriguez

Authors
  1. E. Aghaarabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Aminravan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Sadiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Hoorfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. J. Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Najjaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Najjaran.

Appendix 1: Microbial and physicochemical quality indices

Appendix 1: Microbial and physicochemical quality indices

Tables 4 and 5 present microbial and physicochemical quality indices and similarity degree of activated clusters from fuzzy rule based system in Quebec City water distribution network proposed in this study.

Table 4 Microbial quality index and similarity degree of activated clusters from fuzzy rule based system
Full size table
Table 5 Physicochemical quality index and similarity degree of activated clusters from fuzzy rule based system
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aghaarabi, E., Aminravan, F., Sadiq, R. et al. Application of neuro-fuzzy based expert system in water quality assessment. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8 (Suppl 4), 2137–2145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0315-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation