Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic algorithm designed for solving portfolio optimization problems subjected to cardinality constraint

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a new algorithm named BEXPM-RM is proposed which require no constraint handling techniques to solve portfolio optimization problems subjected to budget, cardinality, and lower/upper bound constraints. The algorithm presented combines the BEX-PM (Thakur et al. in Appl Math Comput 235:292–317, 2014) genetic algorithm (GA) together with repair mechanism (RM) proposed by Chang et al. (Comput Oper Res 27(13):1271–1302, 2000). BEXPM GA tries to efficiently explore the search space whereas repair method suggested by Chang et al. (2000) ensures that a solution string is always feasible subject to the budget, cardinality, and lower/upper bound constraints. To analyze the performance of BEXPM-RM, six portfolio optimization problems are considered from the literature (Chang et al. 2000; Barak et al. in Eur J Oper Res 228(1):141–147, 2013). Among these one problem uses fuzzy set theory and others used probability theory to quantify attributes of a portfolio. In addition to these problems, a new portfolio model is formulated in fuzzy environment to analyze the effect of providing different sets of lower or/and upper bound to an asset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barak S, Abessi M, Modarres M (2013) Fuzzy turnover rate chance constraints portfolio model. Eur J Oper Res 228(1):141–147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-J, Meade N, Beasley JE, Sharaiha YM (2000) Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Comput Oper Res 27(13):1271–1302

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2000) An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186(2):311–338

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deep K, Singh KP, Kansal M, Mohan C (2009) A real coded genetic algorithm for solving integer and mixed integer optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 212(2):505–518

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deep K, Thakur M (2007) A new mutation operator for real coded genetic algorithms. Appl Math Comput 193(1):211–230

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deng G-F, Lin W-T, Lo C-C (2012) Markowitz-based portfolio selection with cardinality constraints using improved particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 39(4):4558–4566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Lai K K, Wang S (2008) Fuzzy portfolio optimization: theory and methods. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Inuiguchi M, Mehlawat MK, Mittal G (2013) Multiobjective credibilistic portfolio selection model with fuzzy chance-constraints. Inform Sci 229:1–17

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X (2006) Fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection. Appl Math Comput 177(2):500–507

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X (2008) Risk curve and fuzzy portfolio selection. Comput Math Appl 55(6):1102–1112

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jalota H, Thakur M (2016) Fuzzy classification using self-adaptive algorithm to generate membership function. Opt Invent Control Manag Tech, p 47

  • Jalota H (2016) Soft computing approaches for portfolio optimization: An empirical study. PhD thesis, School of Basic Sciences, Indian Institute Of Technology Mandi, Mandi, India

  • Jobst NJ, Horniman MD, Lucas CA, Mitra G et al (2001) Computational aspects of alternative portfolio selection models in the presence of discrete asset choice constraints. Quant Finance 1(5):489–501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Katagiri H, Sakawa M, Ishii H (2005) A study on fuzzy random portfolio selection problems based on possibility and necessity measures. Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae 61(2):361–370

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kresta A, Slova K Solving cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem by binary particle swarm optimization algorithm. Department of Mathematical Methods in Economics, Faculty of Economics, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Sokolská třída, vol 33, no 701, p 21

  • León T, Liern V, Vercher E (2002) Viability of infeasible portfolio selection problems: a fuzzy approach. Eur J Oper Res 139(1):178–189

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection*. J Finance 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (2014) Mean-variance approximations to expected utility. Eur J Oper Res 234(2):346–355

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H, Todd P, Xu G, Yamane Y (1993) Computation of mean-semivariance efficient sets by the critical line algorithm. Ann Oper Res 45(1):307–317

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ortí FJ, Sáez J, Terceño A (2002) On the treatment of uncertainty in portfolio selection. Fuzzy Econ Rev 7(2):59

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponsich A, Jaimes AL, Coello CAC (2013) A survey on multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for the solution of the portfolio optimization problem and other finance and economics applications. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 17(3):321–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AD (1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econ J Econ Soc 431–449

  • Thakur M, Meghwani SS, Jalota H (2014) A modified real coded genetic algorithm for constrained optimization. Appl Math Comput 235:292–317

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vercher E, Bermudez JD (2013) A possibilistic mean-downside risk-skewness model for efficient portfolio selection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21(3):585–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watada J (2001) Fuzzy portfolio model for decision making in investment. Dynamical aspects in fuzzy decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1999) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100:9–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemant Jalota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalota, H., Thakur, M. Genetic algorithm designed for solving portfolio optimization problems subjected to cardinality constraint. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9, 294–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0574-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0574-z

Keywords

Navigation