Abstract
Benchmarking via carefully designed competitions makes it possible to provide a common framework for the rigorous comparison of intelligent and autonomous systems; competitions may play the role of scientific experiments while being appealing both to researchers and to the general public thus promoting critical analysis of systems outside the labs. This paper describes our approach to benchmarking domestic service robots through organizing recurrent competitions under the European Robotics League. It details the tools and benchmarks designed to evaluate the performance of robots at task and functionality levels. In particular, the functionality benchmarks for object perception and navigation are described and an overview of the new benchmarks to appear in the league is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
With replicable experiments we refer to experiments, and benchmarks, which are both reproducible and repeatable.
List of certified testbeds: http://www.eu-robotics.net/robotics_league/erl-consumer/certified-test-beds.
RSBB robot communication package: http://github.com/rockin-robot-challenge/at_home_rsbb_comm_ros.
Benchmark script tutorial: http://github.com/rockin-robot-challenge/rsbb/blob/master/rsbb_etc/doc/bmbox/benchmark_script_tutorial.md.
A 3D model of the positioner used at the ERL is available at https://github.com/rockin-robot-challenge/ERL-Reports-Attachements.
Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2547688.
References
Amigoni F, Bastianelli E, Berghofer J, Bonarini A, Fontana G, Hochgeschwender N, Iocchi L, Kraetzschmar GK, Lima PU, Matteucci M, Miraldo M, Nardi D, Schiaffonati V (2015) Competitions for benchmarking: task and functionality scoring complete performance assessment. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 22(3):53–61
Lima PU (2017) RoCKIn: benchmarking through robot competitions. InTechOpen, Rijeka
Dias J, Althoefer K, Lima PU (2016) Robot competitions: what did we learn? IEEE Robot Autom Mag 23(1):16–18
Anderson M, Jenkins OC, Osentoski S (2011) Recasting robotics challenges as experiments. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(2):10–11
Prassler E, Munich ME, Pirjanian P, Kosuge K (2016) Domestic robotics. Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, Cham, pp 1729–1758
Young JE, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, Igarashi T (2009) Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):95
Müller AC, Behnke S (2014) Learning depth-sensitive conditional random fields for semantic segmentation of rgb-d images. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 6232-6237
Messias J, Ventura R, Lima P, Sequeira J, Alvito P, Marques C, Carriço P (2014) A robotic platform for edutainment activities in a pediatric hospital. In: IEEE international conference on autonomous robot systems and competitions (ICARSC), pp 193-198
Muszynski S, Stückler J, Behnke S (2012) Adjustable autonomy for mobile teleoperation of personal service robots. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Ro-MAN), pp 933–940
Pineda LA, Salinas L, Meza IV, Rascon C, Fuentes G (2013) Sitlog: a programming language for service robot tasks. Int J Adv Rob Syst 10(10):358
RoCKIn: Robot competitions kick innovation in cognitive systems. http://rockinrobotchallenge.eu. Accessed Dec 2018
euRathlon: An outdoor robotics challenge for land, sea and air. https://www.eurathlon.eu. Accessed Dec 2018
European Robotics League. https://www.eu-robotics.net/robotics_league/. Accessed Dec 2018
Basiri M et al (2018) Rulebook of the European robotic league for consumer service robots. https://eu-robotics.net/robotics_league/erl-consumer
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by EU Horizon 2020 Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under Grants agreements n688441 and n780086.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basiri, M., Piazza, E., Matteucci, M. et al. Benchmarking Functionalities of Domestic Service Robots Through Scientific Competitions. Künstl Intell 33, 357–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00619-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00619-9