Skip to main content
Log in

Structural Heterogeneity and Evolutionary Dynamics on Complex Networks

  • Published:
Dynamic Games and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of evolutionary games on networks has revealed the impact of population structure on evolutionary dynamics. Unlike the case in well-mixed population where defection is favored by natural selection, certain types of networks have shown to favor cooperation. However, most previous research work has been focusing on frequency-based analysis, and emphasized on the update strategy adopted by each player, and thus generally considered the group of players with the same strategy as a whole. While it is powerful in deriving analytic results using this approach, the heterogeneity of players within such groups is effectively overlooked. In this paper, we attempt to emphasize more on the heterogeneity of players that comes from the network structure in evolutionary dynamics. Particularly, the prestige of a player is represented by its centrality, and it is reflected in an adapted payoff function. We provide several viable centrality measures that can be calculated using the adjacency matrix of the network. The relation between different centrality measures of the invader and the fixation of cooperation is analyzed via computational simulations. Results show that in the proposed model, compared to other three centrality measures, invaders with maximum betweenness centrality have significant advantage in terms of the fixation probability of cooperation, in both scale-free and small-world networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramson G, Kuperman M (2001) Social games in a social network. Phys Rev E Statist Phys Plasmas Fluids Related Interdiscip Top 63(3):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen B, Lippner G, Chen YT, Fotouhi B, Momeni N, Yau ST, Nowak MA (2017) Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure. Nature 544(7649):227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amaral MA, Javarone MA (2018) Heterogeneous update mechanisms in evolutionary games: mixing innovative and imitative dynamics. Phys Rev E 97(4):16–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Assenza S, Gómez-Gardeñes J, Latora V (2008) Enhancement of cooperation in highly clustered scale-free networks. Phys Rev E Statist Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 78(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Axelord R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonacich P (2012) Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 92(5):1170–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barabasi A, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Benzi M, Klymko C (2015) On the limiting behavior of parameter-dependent network centrality measures. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 36(2):686–706

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw 27(1):55–71

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen YT, McAvoy A, Nowak MA (2016) Fixation Probabilities for Any Configuration of Two Strategies on Regular Graphs. Scientific Reports, 6

  11. Cimini G (2017) Evolutionary network games: equilibria from imitation and best response dynamics. Complexity 2017:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Grinstead CM, Snell JL (1997) Introduction to probability. American Mathematical Society, Providence

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hauert C, Nowak MA, Lieberman E (2005) Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 433(7023):312–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Konno T (2011) A condition for cooperation in a game on complex networks. J Theor Biol 269(1):224–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Li C, Zhang B, Cressman R, Tao Y (2013) Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous graph: fixation probabilities under weak selection. PLoS ONE 8(6):2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lien JW, Charness G, Zhang B, Li C, Yang C-L (2018) Endogenous rewards promote cooperation. Proc National Acad Sci 115(40):9968–9973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nanda M, Durrett R (2017) Spatial evolutionary games with weak selection. Proc National Acad Sci 114(23):6046–6051

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Negre CFA, Morzan UN, Hendrickson HP, Pal R, Lisi GP, Loria JP, Rivalta I, Ho J, Batista VS (2018) Eigenvector centrality for characterization of protein allosteric pathways. Proc National Acad Sci 115(52):E12201 LP–E12208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805):1560–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nowak MA, Fu F, Tarnita CE, Antal T, Ohtsuki H (2009) Strategy selection in structured populations. J Theor Biol 259(3):570–581

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Nowak MA, May RM (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359(6398):826–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak MA (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441(7092):502–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohtsuki H, Nowak MA (2006) The replicator equation on graphs. J Theor Biol 243(1):86–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Santos FC, Pacheco JM, Lenaerts T (2006) Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc National Acad Sci 103(9):3490–3494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Santos FC, Rodrigues JF, Pacheco JM (2005) Epidemic spreading and cooperation dynamics on homogeneous small-world networks. Phys Rev E Statist Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 72(5):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith JM (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith JM, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Szabó G, Fáth G (2007) Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys Rep 446(4–6):97–216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor PD, Day T, Wild G (2007) Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph. Nature 447(7143):469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomassini M, Luthi L, Giacobini M (2006) Hawks and Doves on small-world networks. Phys Rev E Statist Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 73(1):016132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Trivers RLBY (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Rev Biol 46(1):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(June):440–442

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilhite A (2014) Network structure, games, and agent dynamics. J Econ Dyn Control 47:225–238

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu J-J, Li C, Zhang B-Y, Cressman R, Tao Y (2014) The role of institutional incentives and the exemplar in promoting cooperation. Sci Rep 4:6421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianjia Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71871171, 71871173, and 71701076).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Wang, X., Gu, C. et al. Structural Heterogeneity and Evolutionary Dynamics on Complex Networks. Dyn Games Appl 11, 612–629 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-020-00365-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-020-00365-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation