Abstract
This paper considers a game-theoretic model of external control influence on opinion dynamics and reached consensus in a social network. The network participants are linked through an arbitrary communication graph. The goal of control is to keep the opinions of all network participants in the neighborhood of a given value. If there are several players, these target values may differ. The dynamic game under consideration belongs to the class of linear-quadratic games in discrete time. Optimal control and equilibrium are calculated using the Bellman equation. In the symmetric case, the solution is constructed analytically. Some numerical simulations illustrate the influence of the communication structure of a social network on the opinion dynamics and reached consensus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou-Kandil H, Freiling G, Ionescu V, Jank G (2003) Matrix Riccati equations in control and systems theory. Birkhäuser, Basel
Basar T, Olsder GJ (1998) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Barabanov IN, Korgin NA, Novikov DA, Chkhartishvili AG (2010) Dynamic models of informational control in social networks. Autom Remote Control 71(11):2417–2426
Bauso D, Tembine H, Basar T (2016) Opinion dynamics in social networks through mean field games. SIAM J Control Optim 54(6):3225–3257
Bindel D, Kleinberg J, Oren S (2014) How bad is forming your own opinion? Games Econ Behav 92:248–265
Bure VM, Parilina EM, Sedakov AA (2017) Consensus in a social network with two principals. Autom Remote Control 78(8):1489–1499
Caponigro M, Piccoli B, Rossi F, Trelat E (2016) Sparse feedback stabilization of multi-agent dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 55th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 4278–4283
Chkhartishvili AG, Gubanov DA, Novikov DA (2019) Social network: models of information influence, control and confrontation. Springer, Berlin
De Groot M (1974) Reaching a consensus. Am Stat Assoc 69:119–121
Dockner EJ, Jorgensen S, Long NV, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Etesami SR, Basar T (2015) Game-theoretic analysis of the Hegselmann-Krause model for opinion dynamics in finite dimensions. IEEE Trans Autom Control 60(7):1886–1897
Etesami SR, Bolouki S, Nedic A, Basar T, Poor HV (2018) Influence of conformist and manipulative behaviors on public opinion. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 6(1):202–214
Friedkin NE, Johnson EC (1990) Social influence and opinions. J Math Sociol 15(1–2):193–206
Ghaderi J, Srikant R (2014) Opinion dynamics in social networks with stubborn agents: equilibrium and convergence rate. Automatica 50(12):3209–3215
Hegselmann R, Krause U (2005) Opinion dynamics driven by various ways of averaging. Comput Econ 25:381–405
Mazalov V, Parilina E (2019) Game of competition for opinion with two centers of influence. In: 18th international conference on mathematical optimization theory and operations research—MOTOR 2019. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 11548, pp 673–684
Mazalov VV, Parilina EM (2020) The Euler-equation approach in average-oriented opinion dynamics. Mathematics 8(3):1–16
Mazalov VV, Dorofeeva YuA, Parilina EM (2020) Opinion control in a team with complete and incomplete information. Contrib Game Theory Manag 13:324–334
Niazi M U B, Ozguller A B, Yildiz A (2016) Consensus as a Nash equilibrium of a dynamic game. In: 12 International conference on signal-image technology and internet-based systems (SITIS), pp 365–372
Rogov MA, Sedakov AA (2020) Coordinated influence on the opinions of social network members. Autom Remote Control 81(3):528–547
Sedakov AA, Zhen M (2019) Opinion dynamics game in a social network with two influence nodes. Vestn St Petersb Univ Appl Math Comput Sci 15:118–125
Varma VS, Lasaulce S, Mounthanyvong J, Morrescu IC (2019) Allocation marketing resources over social networks: a long-term analysis. IEEE Control Syst Lett 3(4):1002–1007
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Shandong Province “Double-Hundred Talent Plan” (No. WST2017009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection “Multi-agent Dynamic Decision Making and Learning” edited by Konstantin Avrachenkov, Vivek S. Borkar, and U. Jayakrishnan Nair.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, H., Mazalov, V.V., Gao, H. et al. Opinion Dynamics Control in a Social Network with a Communication Structure. Dyn Games Appl 13, 412–434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-021-00406-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-021-00406-y